Let’s be real, they’re the best band that ever was or will be.
Every thread is a bait thread now. Hiro please just delete this shit board
>>123679237Ringo ate my baby!
>>123679237>boomer girls were creaming their panties over these 4 inbred bongsI hate females so much
>>123679237>mogs your entire careerNothing personnel kid
band name?
>>123679325One Direction
>>123679324Who?
>>123679237They completely stopped live performing thoughWhat was that shit aboutYou're a band that doesn't play shows
>>123679307They've done you.
>>123679237they were when they had the Best drummer.
>>123679439their shows were awful. they had crappy sound equipment and you couldn't hear a thing over the screaming fans. many shows ended early when the fans rushed the stage and the band had to run for their lives. After '66, they decided it was pointless to play live, and they were right. Unfortunately, they stopped just when sound equipment was just getting really good for big concerts.
>>123679439Teenage Girls simply couldn’t handle their rizz. Beatles concerts at this point were more like some kind of cult worship freak show where all anyone could hear was screaming girls, ambulances had to be on standby to handle the sheer hysteria, people were trying to lay hands on them for legendary healing powers like the 12 apostles or some shit and they had to travel exclusively by armoured car. Literally could not hear themselves even play the show between the noise and the shitty 1960s technology they were using.Just took all the fun out of it really and made it weird.
this is why. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WF9BpYcpVv0
>>123679237MOGGED
>>123679439They didn't need the money
>>123679237So no one ever asked how they were able to write so many good songs despite being so average? Everyone who was asked about them in the early days said they suck, and the way they explain their songwriting in their interviews makes no sense at all
>>123679730yeah, they sucked balls and their songs are covered more than any other songs ever written. but they sucked because reasons.
list of the 50 most-covered songs ever, includes:2) Yesterday5) Eleanor Rigby10) And I Love Her12) Imagine13) Let It Be14) Michelle15) Blackbird16) Hey Jude17) Here, There, and Everywhere20) Here Comes the Sun22) Norwegian Wood23) Something28) In My Life31) Come Together33) The Fool on the Hill35) With a Little Help from My Friends36) A Hard Day's Night
>>123679730In their early days they were basically a shitty teenager skiffle band that got paid to practice every night as a career because the barrier to entry as a professional rock musician was just that low when every nightclub needed a band every night. By the time record labels were looking at them they were already fairly seasoned.
The cover that nearly killed Zappa.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOt2F5czB_A
>>123679237who thought those suits would look good?
>PLAYBOY: "Alright, but get back to the music itself. You don't agree that the Beatles created the best rock 'n roll that's been produced?">LENNON: "I don't. The Beatles, you see... I'm too involved in them artistically. I cannot see them objectively. I cannot listen to them objectively. I'm dissatisfied with every record the Beatles ever fucking made. There ain't one of them I wouldn't remake... including all the Beatles records and all my individual ones. So I cannot possibly give you an assessment of what the Beatles are. When I was a Beatle, I thought we were the best fucking group in the god-damned world. And believing that is what made us what we were... whether we call it the best rock 'n roll group or the best pop group or whatever. But you play me those tracks today and I want to remake every damn one of them. There's not a single one... I heard 'Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds' on the radio last night. It's abysmal, you know. The track is just terrible. I mean, it's great, but it wasn't made right, know what I mean? But that's the artistic trip, isn't it? That's why you keep going. But to get back to your original question about the Beatles and their music, the answer is that we did some good stuff and we did some bad stuff."
>>123679237This but unironically. The female offshoot they authorized back in 1970 when Let It Be dropped was pretty cool too.
>>123679338
>>123679237I mean yes? And it's not even a controversial opinion. That's what's scary. We're so divided nowadays that it's safe to say nobody in the next decades or even centuries will be as unaunanimously successful and loved as The Beatles. They were so lucky to be in the right place, at the right time.
>>123681671This pic is so old it could be in high school by now
in the 1970s john lennon really tried his hardest to be lou reed
>>123679237Rubber Soul to Abbey Road is an all timer run of albums (Yellow Submarine doesn't count)
>>123681695Actually it couldn’t because One Direction only formed in 2011
>>123681695>>123681733The pic may be 60 years old, but One Direction references are also old.
the beatles intended to change the world for the better and inspire future musicians. instead, they doomed the world of creatives, for there could never be a band greater than the beatles.the beatles show the price of glory for others -- every band now plays knowing they will never best their idols
>>123679244>REEEEE WHY DO YOU TALK ABOUT THE INVENTORS OF CONTEMPORARY MUSIC ON THE MUSIC BOARD
I really enjoy the chord progression on If I Fell :-)
>>123681848Definitely one of their best early tracks
>>123681848For me, it’s the harmony during>’Cuz I couldn't stand the pain>And I, would be sad if our new love>Was in vain
>>123681839Yeah but these aren't genuine threads about The Beatles. It's just Nicofag (You) bait.
>>123681839Paul invented music. the rest were freeloaders
>>123681498what is this even from?
>>123681995Taking Off (1971)
