How does this work?
>>123679240Calling it E flat is strange, I would think D sharp would make more sense.
>>123679551>I would think D sharp would make more sense.Yup
>>123679551Correct, in fact the chord should be identified as Emaj7 (E-G#-B-D#), not E7
>>123679551>>123679687The E7 chord is probably a secondary dominant in the progression and the key of the song probably doesn't contain the E note (hence the A7 with a #5 instead of the natural 5th, which would be the e note)>>123680144It's E7 with major eb note played on top of it as a melody (or extention), not just an Emaj7 chord, that's the whole deal with that pic
