Blur or Oasis?
>>123689422Blur, always.
OasisBut Blur is great too
>>123689422Blur are terrible. Oasis has a few good songs.The Gallagher brothers occasionally amuse me. Damon Albarn is just annoying and charmless. Apparently their bass player makes good cheese though.
>>123689422“Parklife” is one of the most definitive and iconic albums on British music HISTORY. Forget the 90s. HISTORY.That album cover was literally made into a stamp. “13” is like all the good parts of Radiohead except with a real human heart pumping red blood through its veins.Oasis isn’t even in the best band on Creation debate the wall.
>>123690501>Parklifemore like SHITE LOIFE
>>123690529More like marmite
>>123689422Oasis have like 2 good albums, 3 if you include the B-sides one. Blur have maybe 1 but they've consistently made good songs through their run (apart from the last album that was all dogshit) All Oasis albums after the second have literally 1 good song on them and it's a pastiche of something from the Beatles or the 70s literally 0 creative input, at least Blur kept trying.
>>123689422Oasis are a better singles band. Blue have better albums. Coxon is an amazing guitarist. I prefer Blur.Parklife is the best britpop album (yes better than Different Class)
>>123689422Oasis were a better band but Blur made better recordsif that makes sense
>>123689422oasis because they sound like actual songs you can hum and karaoke. blur just sounds like coldplay noise shit.
>>123689422https://youtu.be/9LFmS0chcOc?si=eubCUbC0KRSl8cx-
>>123692278Biblical Celestial