[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_1088.jpg (1.08 MB, 1125x1973)
1.08 MB
1.08 MB JPG
Have you guys noticed something?

I started getting into music seriously at age 13-14, around 2007-2008. Got into a bunch of /mu/core and whatnot. Back then a lot of the stuff that was being praised as ”classic” was relatively new.

17 years later, THE SAME stuff is still being hyped. You’d think that with something like electronic music and technological advancements we’d be getting novel innovative ”classics” pushing the boundaries of musical possibilities. Young geniuses born with free access to more information than ever from day 1. But nope, apparently they're all just making some lazy fast food ass mumble rap over vaporwave loops or something that nobody gives a shit about after one week
>>
You're just lazy
>>
>>124165024
Around 2012-2016 /mu/ was at its peak relevance so the charts that were shared around here then were the ones that were immortalized. Maybe you should make some new updated charts with music you think people should be listening to instead of jacking off the same old shit like everyone else. That's what people did back then. Reignite the avant teen in yourself and start digging, faggot.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.