How come they don't have a single good album in their discography?
bump
>>124461452why?
>>124461747Why not? It's something I'd like to know.
>>124460808Beatles posers
>SINGLES BAND
because they existed in the era of singles where albums were afterthought cash grabs by labels outside of some more ambitious forward looking artists, which the Dave Clark 5 were decidedly not
>>124466986Yet the Beatles were
>>124466999not really at first, the Beatles just had a better well of songs, both originals and covers, and went into the studio in a day and cut the first album. It was only later when it became a big thing, but by that point John and Paul were probably the amoungst the best songwriters in world, while Dave Clark was writing some cheap formulaic stuff.
