[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1731982731652218.png (104 KB, 400x450)
104 KB
104 KB PNG
>music journalists give an album mixed reviews when released
>years later they say it's one of the best of all time
why do they do this? Makes them look stupid and indecisive.
>>
hes gonna miss this one
>>
you see this happen on rotten tomatoes with movies, there are movies the general public love but critics hate
>>
>>124465118
hmmm is that…

>>124465140
ok it’s not just me
>>
>>124465155
what is the pic referencing? I just grabbed it off /tv/
>>
cheese thread
>>
>>124465118
journalism is fucking evil that's why
>>
>>124465118
It takes a while for an album to warm up on some people.
>>
>>124465118
better than when they say a shitty album is a masterpiece and keep repeating that lie for 50 years
>>
>>124465254
the guy from the original ninja turtles cartoon
>>
>>124465118
>all j*urnalists are one person
>>
it happens very frequently with music magazines, but usually the reviews/articles are written by different people



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.