Are they a boyband?
boybands sing about lovey dovey stuff, the stones sang about smashing pussy. there is a clear difference here.
>>124466056ye no women
>>124466064they sang lovey dovey shit too.
>>124466074yeah in like, the mid 60s
>>124466092Still a boyband regardless.
>>124466056Have you seen how ugly they all were except for Brian?
>>124466328They weren't THAT ugly
>>124466328Jagger was pretty hot in his prime
>>124466099Not even remotely. At a bare minimum, to be a boyband, all the actual members have to sing and/or rap. And regularly at that. Even then, I wouldn't call a group like, say, The Beatles or even The Monkees boybands. They were just rock bands, regardless of only one group forming in an authentic fashion.The only groups from the time that resemble what would become boybands were groups like The Osmonds and The Jackson 5, as all their members regularly sang, and even danced. Which made sense, as they started off as barbershop groups. Both have far better claims towards being the first boyband than The Beatles. Though Menudo's probably a better camdidate for the actual first boyband.
Of course they are.They're boys, who formed a band.>DUH!
>>124466056Trust fund band
>>124466774Could it be any more obvious?
