One more lane bro
>all these brain dead batavoids waiting obediently in their little segregation zone while they get passed by cars on the empty car laneI am once again reminding you that John Forester did nothing wrong
>>1988861The logic for bike lanes is based on the principle of "slower traffic keep right" and the bicycle lane being an "extra slow traffic" lane. So in theory this should be abstracted to:>no "protected" bike lanes, they're useless anyway>no vehicular traffic? go for it, cyclist dude>going with traffic, cyclists should take caution making turns, using proper hand signals (though taking crosswalks is acceptable behavior)>not letting faster vehicles pass should be viewed as douchebag behavior
>>1988848why don't they move to the road? are they american?
That's what a country of queers looks like
Just ride in the fucking road FFS.>>1988899No over here there is no one on the bike lane OR sidewalks.
>>1988898>not letting faster vehicles pass should be viewed as douchebag behaviorSee >>1988861
>>1988848John Forester was right
>>1988958I honestly don't know enough about John Forester to know if he advocated letting faster vehicles pass or not.
>>1989038he advocated for car owners later in his life and had retarded, contradictory opinions that only made sense in a post war america where the mere thought of a bike lane was impossible so you had to cope with street biking. btw he did think cars should pass bikes and that it was totally fine for them to get close to bikers and nearly run them off the road but still claimed to be pro bike.
>>1989047like any good bait post this is about 20% truth and 80% nonsense
>>1989054it's literally true, john forester is a retard i'm sick of him being shilled.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpnZy7RrO3I
>>1989059buy an ad
>>1988861yeah i'm thinking based
>>1988848>traffic :\>traffic, bikes :O
>>1988848bike lane still transports ten times more people per hour than the road even when there's occasonal standstill traffic
Forester makes sense given that there was a very real possibility that bikes would be banned from public roads altogether.
>>1989617>wasyou act like there aren't a ton of places where you can get ticketed just for passing another cyclist while a car driver exists
>>1988848Looks like Copenhagen to me, as the gomore building is located there. Well, who would have thought that the Danes are also such cucks who allow themselves to be dictated to like sheep - but since the plandemic I am no longer surprised by such obedient cucked herd behaviour in the degenerated West.
bikes are not a serious form of transportation
>>1988848Lane?
>>1990091nooooo you can't just use public infrastructure that you paid for! that's only for motorists! this is for your own good! they don't know what's in their interests! please segregate me sir!
ONE LANEI DON'T KNOW WHY
>>1990091Worked for a bit in Beijing, I miss having a daily commute that looked like a bicycle race. Though the bike I had was bottom of the barrel garbage.
>>1990093Incredibly poor example for bicycle advocacy.>under the "bicycle kingdom" era, all bicycles had to have paid-for licenses, something that would elicit screeching if suggested today>as wealth and buying power increased, people switched to cars, suggesting that cars are in fact the superior form of transportation if you can afford it
