>supposedly 20,000+ containers on that shipThat looks like 1,000 - 2,000 at most.I call bullshit.
>>2000560Cont.There's a cross-section of 8x20 containers, and there're 24 cross-sections.So, it's 8x20x24 - which is 3,840 containers, roughly.Who are they trying to fool?
>>2000560Container ship capacity is measured in TEU (twenty foot equivalent units) so that's probably where it got mixed up
Is op the same dumbass who tried to peddle a conspiracy theory that Boeing 747s can't hold their rated fuel capacity because he doesn't understand volume?
>>2000560There are 5k -6k there 8x24x24 but the middle sections are 14 high
>>2000560
I wonder how much this thing is insured for, and how much would the damages be if it sank.
>>2000560>>2000562Like >>2000577 says that's 20 foot equivalent. Those look like 40-45 foot containers so it might carrying half of that 20,000+ TEU capacity in actual containers.Plus there will be loads of containers down in the hull that can't be seen in that picture.
Is that the ship that got truck in the Suez canal? Somebody said it had dead children on it.
>>2000560Do you realise that bad boi has 45 ft more below the sea line?
>>2000562>holdwhat is that?
