[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/n/ - Transportation


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


An anon on /o/ redirected me here. Let's talk about them.
>>
velomobile.
Buty why make it have a distinctive automotive appearance ? >>>/o/
>>
>>2001283
Oh let him stay, this is fun
>>
No way this is fun... with 4 wheels and no motor you can go fast only downhill, but at that point a soapbox kart design is better. And for cycling designs 3 wheels are better
>>
Reminds me of The Little Rascals
>>
>>2001286
>no motor
Cyclekarts do have 200cc engine. And the rule is that it has to be a scaled down version of real pre ww2 cars or at least mimic one.
It's a gokart with "classic" body.
>>
They're called recumbents and they are favored by weird old men
>>
>>2001290
>>>/o/
>>
>>2001286
Would having a motor make it too fast for this board?
>>
>>2001290
Oh shit well, back to /o/ with this one
Cyclecart is a dumb name for something with an engine
And op is dumb for not introducing the topic
>>
File: 20191123_113928.jpg (3.64 MB, 4608x3456)
3.64 MB
3.64 MB JPG
>>2001312
we can still talk about pedal cars.
Although velomobiles are more efficient. But for fun, why not.
pic related
>>
>>2001305
No, it would make it too expensive for this board
>>
>>2001305
Walking speed is too fast for some people here
>>
>>2001312
They're essentially a class smaller than cycle*cars*, which were driven by motorcycle engines, and were pretty popular around the turn of the century because automobile engines were so expensive.

Here, they're meant to be hand built and using a small generator or power tool engine
>>
>>2001502
uncage your feet and slow your stroll, carbrain. Walking is NOT a race
>>
File: 1664771996402461.jpg (375 KB, 760x854)
375 KB
375 KB JPG
>>2001508
no

get gud
>>
>>2001508
>Implying that anyone here actually leaves their neetcave. Or isn't an astroturf bot

>>2001520
Based. I regularly mog retards on the trail
>>
>>2001508
Faster walking is fun, and why else are my legs so long, if not to mog fatties/manlets
>>
>>2001529
love me long legs
there is nothing better than powerwalking through a group of people like you're on a fucking mission and you're just like having a casual stroll but you look like a fucking tyrannosaurus rex to all the manlets
>>
I always wonder what 4 professional cyclists could achieve on a double surrey
>>
>>2001545
kek. I know they was a video with 1v1 on one of those things in the dirt.
>>
File: 1716664886854461.jpg (100 KB, 622x465)
100 KB
100 KB JPG
I gotta wonder for these, how reasonable of an idea would it be to get a few of those "pedal assist" kits and just have a motor on all four wheels, linked to a throttle pedal?
>>
>>2001283
>Buty why make it have a distinctive automotive appearance ?
cause cars are cool, efficient and manly
>>
>>2001283
Four wheels good, two wheels baaaad
>>
>>2001708
Just a wild guess but I'd say no more than 1k? I bet someone over on >>>/diy/ can come up with a schematic



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.