Is Tirana when Albania was under communism the dream /o/ city?>cars are banned>everyone has to take public transportation>lots of parks and shit>roads are aimed for bikesSo why doesn’t /o/ talk about Tirana that much?
>>2007444I mean /n/, not /o/. Wrong board name
Because nu-/n/ is only able to discuss the contents of real estate industry press releases concerning kansas city or houston (if you disagree with me you are a cagetroll nimby boomer)
>>2007444It’s at least partly because people on this board don’t talk about policy, we just fantasize about our personal dreams coming true. Also there’s not much consensus on the role of the state in urban planning and infrastructure here since opinions range from everything should be centrally planned to wanting every city to be Houston but with more trains. Finally most people on 4chan are already from Can-merica so there’s overall a fear of communism paired with general lack of interest in other countries
>>2007452>>2007889I miss the old /n/ where we had threads that were several years old with people actually talking about modes of transport rather than urban planning politics.
>>2007444>cars are bannedWhichever bureaucrat put this measure in place is a genius. People won't notice the state was in no way able to keep up with the demand for private automobiles if they don't look into buying a car.Also says a lot about what the people want when nowadays every man, woman and child in Albania drives a Benz.
And now check out how the average Albanian moves around these days.
>>2007444If the price is all the other table setting for abuse of centralized power, who cares? You can do the same thing with accurate taxation to incentivise more responsible choices from the public, let alone the moral superiority of facing reality more and more by living in reality and not building a house of cards by treating citizens like children.....you can call that equally delusional, just the opposite political pole, but that I'm no way undermines it as the only way forward, sink or swim.
>>2007889/this boardIt's anti-thetical to the mandate of this board, but yes, transport more and more is immoral, and walkable is the only way for humans to live. All other movement only induces snowballing ineffiency. A train would move between these human reactors ONLY when maximally needed. All humanities problems would be solved.>>2007999Someone (mindfully or not) understood card are communism, the most hilariously over extended variety even avowed commies on paper laugh at their untenablity. However you get to the right answer....
>>2007444was the public transit any good? personally, i think a combination of bikes, pedestrians and an overabundance of trams is peak urban transportation. you should be allowed to own a car but only if it's stored on private property(japanese model) and not allowed anywhere in city centers.
It's an ESL namefag edgelord retard episode...(No (You)s from me sperg.)
>>2007444
Bump.
