It’s 2024 and nobody can properly simulate airplane crash physics. Ground collision still looks like bouncing Pringle cans and smoke particle effects. BeamNG drive proved it’s possible with cars and trucks. What is stopping soft body physics simulations with pressurized tubes and wings?
>What is stopping soft body physics simulations with pressurized tubes and wings?Things would get too obvious too quickly
>>2017440lmao at people not understanding the difference between impulse and energygo back to school and attend physics class
>>2017440This man would be shocked to find the wind that blows on his face can also knock down steel towers.
>>2017440>bullet dropped from your hand vs bullet shot out of a gun have different impact forces with the ground >this is considered surprising to people
>>2017451>>2017455>>2017497Conservatives think science is a hoax
>>2017440Why can't troofers understand K.E. = (1/2)m* v^2??>Skyscrapers>Solid>Steel
>>2017440Jet fuel can't melt the Alps>>2017428Plane crash in hilly terrain looks indeed different.>I am Andreas Lubitz and I approve of both statements.
>>2017499go back to plebbit
>>2017428BeamNG would be amazing for a flight sim and for a battlebots game
Doesn't look too realistic to me desuhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3E82-fIuSxg
Softbody+Aerodynamics simulation running at the same time definitely can melt steel beams
>>2017830yes only emotionally stunted developmentally challenged boys are allowed here
>>2017428It requires Finite Element Analysis with huge numbers of elements and huge physics database. Only a supercomputer can process in anything approaching real time
