Anonymous Colorado Republicans block chi(...) 04/18/24(Thu)08:24:18 No. 1288229 https://coloradosun.com/2024/04/17/colorado-child-sex-assault-constitution-change-senate-vote/ Republicans in the Colorado Senate on Wednesday blocked the legislature from asking voters to amend the state constitution to let victims of child sex abuse from decades past sue their abusers even if the statute of limitations has run out. Senate Concurrent Resolution 1, which would have sent the question to the November ballot, needed a supermajority of support to pass the chamber. It failed by a single vote. Democrats hold a 23-12 advantage in the Senate, one vote shy of a supermajority. Democrats were united in favor of the resolution. No Republicans would join them, citing concerns about the constitutionality of the measure and how it could bankrupt institutions like churches and school districts. >>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)10:22:54 No. 1288238 >>1288229 >abuse from decades past So, he said/she said. After that long, there's no way to prove it and thus this would only be used to attack/harass men by forcing them to pay out the ass for lawyers defending against charges with zero evidence.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)10:37:49 No. 1288241 they really are the worst kinds of people.. use the law to shield their evil deeds and to sow more. They should all be hung dead for seditious treason. >>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)10:50:38 No. 1288247 >>1288229 >amend the state constitution That's a weird way to do it. Why not simply pass a regular law that allows it? Oh, yeah, the news story. "Republicans bad" because Democraps are playing games.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)11:26:42 No. 1288252 >>1288229 >even if the statute of limitations has run out. Why does an authoritarian government need limitations anyway?>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)11:31:09 No. 1288253 Is anyone at all surprised Republicans would continue to make it easier to get away with fucking kids? >>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)11:34:14 No. 1288254 >>1288238 You want them to come after you when they’re old enough to realize what you did to them>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)12:04:58 No. 1288261 >>1288247 >Why not simply pass a regular law that allows it? Because the state supreme court ruled it was against the state constitution.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)16:16:50 No. 1288322 >>1288261 Ah, then it's illegal and shouldn't be done, but they're trying to do it anyway. Sounds like Democrats.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)19:01:49 No. 1288380 >>1288322 It's not against the state constitution if they pass an amendment to it via ballot measure.>>
Anonymous 04/18/24(Thu)23:47:11 No. 1288425 Won't someone please think of the children? >>
Anonymous 04/19/24(Fri)00:45:02 No. 1288443 >>1288229 Ugh, how will we levy frivolous accusations while the statute of limitations is in place? This is an outrage.>>
Anonymous 04/19/24(Fri)03:17:15 No. 1288466 >>1288443 >frivolous According to whom?>>
Anonymous 04/19/24(Fri)08:02:23 No. 1288500 >>1288229 >even if the statute of limitations has run out. Dishonest faggot>>
Anonymous 04/19/24(Fri)08:03:36 No. 1288502 >>1288241 this has nothing to do with "shielding evil deeds" you shrill fag, it is about (((lawyers))) getting more money.>>
Anonymous 04/19/24(Fri)08:04:48 No. 1288503 >>1288253 Even if it passed people would still "get away" with it criminally. This is a about a payday like the New York bullshit.>>
Anonymous 04/19/24(Fri)08:05:49 No. 1288504 >>1288254 >I only realised it was bad when I was thirty five! KYS>>
Anonymous 04/19/24(Fri)12:02:34 No. 1288531 >>1288254 > can't counter the point > insults the poster Again; how are you going to _fairly_ prosecute a guy for a crime that supposedly happened DECADES ago for which there is zero evidence?>>
Anonymous 04/19/24(Fri)12:13:13 No. 1288534 >>1288531 >Neil Elms says he was repeatedly sexually assaulted by Lawrence St. Peter, a Colorado priest who rose to high ranks in the Denver Archdiocese. St. Peter wasn’t removed from clergy despite “numerous, reliable, consistent reports” he was abusing boys. republicans are literal comic book villains>>
Anonymous 04/19/24(Fri)12:35:11 No. 1288537 >>1288534 >he was abusing boys. Homosexuals are evil chomos.>>
GOP of TikTok 04/19/24(Fri)12:55:18 No. 1288546 >>1288229 >could bankrupt institutions like churches and school districts. >>1288238 ok groomers>>1288537 >Homosexuals are evil chomos so sorry about your grooming>>
Anonymous 04/19/24(Fri)13:07:39 No. 1288548 >>1288531 It would be very challenging and I’m guessing a majority of cases would get thrown out, but at least in cases such as >>1288534 there’s the legal framework to go after long term pedos and the people that conspire with them>>
Anonymous 04/19/24(Fri)13:34:10 No. 1288555 >>1288546 >so sorry about your grooming It didn't work. The fag is in jail and I'm straight.>>
Anonymous 04/19/24(Fri)21:01:16 No. 1288637 Just more shit from the GOPedos
Delete Post: [ File Only] Style: Yotsuba Yotsuba B Futaba Burichan Tomorrow Photon
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.