View Announcement
Anonymous [Good News] NYC seeking 14,000(...) 10/10/24(Thu)15:57:40 No. 1351577 https://nypost.com/2024/10/09/us-news/nyc-seeking-14000-hotel-rooms-to-shelter-migrants-through-2025/ They need more room at the inn. New York City’s use of hotels as emergency shelters to house migrants will continue for the foreseeable future, The Post has learned, as the Department of Homeless Services is seeking a contract with hotels to provide a total of 14,000 rooms to shelter migrants at least through next year. The city projects that spending on housing for migrants over the past two years and this fiscal year combined will surpass a staggering $2.3 billion — much of it on rent paid to hotels in the Big Apple. About 150 hotels are currently sheltering migrants and total spending on migrant services over three years will hit $5.76 billion. “The taxpayers can’t pay for this indefinitely,” said Nicole Gelinas, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute think tank. With Mayor Eric Adams under criminal indictment and his administration in disarray, Gelinas said Gov. Kathy Hochul “should take control” of managing the migrant crisis in the city. She said it’s totally unacceptable that so many hotels in Manhattan’s Midtown and downtown tourists district have been converted to migrant shelters instead of serving the tourism industry. “We should stop using hotels as shelters by the end of the year,” Gelinas said. >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)15:58:33 No. 1351578 >>1351577 The city has three existing contracts with the New York City Hotel Association to work with its extensive network of hotels to voluntarily provide shelter space. The total cost to house migrants per room per night is $352 per night, according to city data . There are financial benefits — particularly to hotels in the outer boroughs that are not in tourist districts and have lower occupancy rates. The city will fill all the rooms and pay a hefty sum to do so, providing a reliable revenue stream. “The New York City Department of Homeless Services is seeking to continue the City Sanctuary Facility program by procuring a vendor who can assist in acquiring the use of large scale commercial hotels and hotel management services to help address the current emergency,” the agency said in its new solicitation. The hotel association will apply to oversee the new shelter contract, said its president and CEO, Vijay Dandapani. “We will be filling in the RFP [request for proposal],” he said. Dandapani said the hotel association’s foundation is paid approximately $100,000 per month to administer three of its existing contracts with the city. “We have five full time employees specifically for fulfilling the contractual obligations, besides work done by regular HANYC staff for the contract, in addition to their normal duties,” he said. The city Asylum Funding Tracker projects that migrant shelter costs will drop from $1.51 billion last year to $233 million in the current fiscal year ending June 30, 2025. Adams has said that 30-day shelter limits for individuals and 60 days for families has helped reduce the migrant population in the city’s shelter system.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)16:03:50 No. 1351579 >>1351577 highly upvoted reddit thread discussing the issue: https://old.reddit.com/r/nyc/comments/1g0f65y/exclusive_nyc_seeking_14000_hotel_rooms_to/ Keep in mind that this subreddit was super happy to be a sanctuary city in 2017 and ridicule those who opposed housing and benefits for migrants >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)16:40:13 No. 1351587 send them more, send them more >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)16:40:23 No. 1351588 >>1351577 Good, good>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)16:43:01 No. 1351589 republicans are incredibly bipolar these days >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:06:01 No. 1351597 >>1351589 this isn't a thread about republicans mr schlomo>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:07:06 No. 1351598 >>1351597 but they did send a lot of migrants to NY didn't they>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:13:01 No. 1351600 >>1351598 NY voters were happy to receive them actually, they voted in the current mayor who promised to house them all. Did you read the article? Also the numbers have exploded while the current administration (remind me what party they are again?) has been in full control of the border, ICE, and FEMA, which has led to the current situation. Try reading the article>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:13:48 No. 1351601 >>1351598 A fraction of what is currently residing there. The biden administration could have stopped that at any point during the last four years.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:15:03 No. 1351602 >>1351600 so do you want to build a wall or send immigrants into the heart of america? seems a little bipolar but hey what do i know>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:16:49 No. 1351603 >>1351602 >*incoherent cope noises* enthralling>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:18:21 No. 1351605 wow, fastest shill meltdown yet. concession accepted >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:19:53 No. 1351607 >>1351605 do you have anything to add to the discussion>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:21:17 No. 1351609 >>1351598 Democrats brought them in, Democrats can take care of them. If you have a problem, take it up with the Border Czar, Kamala Harris.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:21:36 No. 1351610 do you want to build a wall or sent thousands of immigrants into america, shill? you still haven't answered >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:23:17 No. 1351612 >>1351610 Not that guy, but I want them deported, and you freaks along with them.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:23:21 No. 1351613 >>1351602 So do you want to bring the third world in or not? If you bring them in, they're your responsibility.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:24:59 No. 1351615 >>1351613 >>1351612 well republicans are the ones busing them in, maybe you should talk to your congressman about that>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:25:05 No. 1351616 >>1351610 Build a wall, but if the Democrats bring them in, they're going straight to Democrat neighborhoods and staying there. Here's some reading material for you. https://www.grammarly.com/blog/rhetorical-devices/false-dilemma-fallacy/ >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:26:06 No. 1351617 >>1351615 No they aren't. That's factually untrue, we're just busing them from one part of the country that didn't vote for them to the part that did vote for them. You're welcome.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:27:17 No. 1351619 >>1351614 >>1351615 what party has been in control of the border and FEMA for the past 4 years?>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:27:18 No. 1351620 >>1351617 and then getting upset about it when it backfires. it's hilarious how retarded you all are. keep it up>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:28:19 No. 1351622 >>1351619 which president had a perfectly good chance to do something about it and played golf for 4 years instead>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:31:48 No. 1351625 >>1351622 >do something about it He tried, retard. Congress fought him every step of the way and the media lied about it.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:32:57 No. 1351628 >>1351625 the congress that was a republican majority? X>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:34:11 No. 1351631 >>1351628 Yes retard. Republicans and Democrats both tried to trip him up, because both parties want immigration. If Trump was actually the Hitler lefties feared he was, he could have used unilateral power to control the border instead of trying to jerk off congress to secure the sovereignty of our country>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:34:54 No. 1351632 >>1351631 so you love trump because he's ineffectual? interesting mental gymnastics>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:34:59 No. 1351633 >>1351622 You mean the president that had democrats shoot down every attempt at securing the border? Dude literally needed to resort to declaring an emergency so that he could ignore democrats desire to have an insecure border and actually begin protecting it.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:35:58 No. 1351635 >>1351633 >Several political scientists described the legislative accomplishments of this Congress as modest, considering that both Congress and the presidency were under unified Republican Party control. >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:39:29 No. 1351638 >>1351622 I don't think Biden can golf.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:53:44 No. 1351646 >>1351635 Pretty sure it was the radical 9th circuit judges that were blocking all attempts by Republican Congress and president to secure the border tho.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)17:57:13 No. 1351648 >>1351632 I hate Trump because he WAS ineffectual. And now he's another instrument coopted by a corrupt system. FEMA, the border etc is all the product of monkey-brained politicians that want a banana instead of actually serving their country.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)18:17:11 No. 1351662 >>1351635 >Several political scientists With those criteria I'm sure I could the same support for any retarded statement on the planet.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)18:18:18 No. 1351664 >>1351620 Never happened. You vote for them, you take them in, period.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)18:21:43 No. 1351667 >>1351615 dems literally voted for and asked for more illegals. republicans said no more illegals. seems like a fair deal to bus them>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)18:23:17 No. 1351668 >>1351622 dems literally shut down the government instead of building a wall and the 3 highest years of illegals entering the US were 2021-2023 (also the 3 highest years of importing "legal" "refugees" and "tps" from shithole countries)>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)18:23:29 No. 1351669 republican shills love proving my point don't they >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)18:28:13 No. 1351673 >>1351669 biden sued to remove razor wire on the border in texas for killing illegals. if it were up to the GOP we would be shooting illegals with machine guns from helicopters. dems want more illegals, so they should take 100% of the illegals>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)18:29:00 No. 1351674 i love when they respond to shill >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)18:44:28 No. 1351688 Oh no Anyway >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:03:32 No. 1351708 >>1351688 no one cares but chuds in the first place, which is why this is a NYpost story>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:06:59 No. 1351712 >>1351708 lol. These NYC residents seem to care, and they've done a full 180 since 4 years ago. Nice attempt at gaslighting though. https://old.reddit.com/r/nyc/comments/1g0f65y/exclusive_nyc_seeking_14000_hotel_rooms_to/ >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:07:05 No. 1351713 >>1351577 They aren't illegal though. I thought only the illegal ones were the problem...>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:10:29 No. 1351714 >>1351712 >redditors represent all citizens of the city You really have no idea what happens outside of your media bubble, huh?>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:15:42 No. 1351717 >>1351714 >redditors are chuds now the mind of a shill is a fascinating place>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:20:00 No. 1351721 Bot word of the day, ‘shill’ >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:21:39 No. 1351723 >>1351717 Redditors are whatever strawman you need, sweettits>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:22:30 No. 1351724 >>1351708 nyc was literally paying illegals to go literally anywhere that wasn't nyc https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/26/migrants-nyc-plane-rides-00123778 >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:24:56 No. 1351726 >>1351724 i wonder why all those migrants were in new york a month after desantis sent all those migrants to new york>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:34:00 No. 1351731 >>1351726 new york voted for more illegals, pudding fingers and wheel chair man were just sending the dems what they literally voted for. If you want we can compromise and put them in concentration camps in the desert like the dems did to Americans>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:34:52 No. 1351733 >>1351731 >new york voted for more illegals When was this?>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:37:10 No. 1351734 >>1351733 he's going to imply sanctuary laws made republicans bus thousands and thousands of migrants further into the US even though that's a very silly position to take>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:38:09 No. 1351736 >>1351734 Ah, so he doesn't know what sanctuary laws are. He thinks sanctuary city means any illegal can come there and are welcome and its totally cool to be illegal.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:41:56 No. 1351737 >>1351736 That's literally what sanctuary laws are.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:42:08 No. 1351738 >>1351737 According to whom?>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:47:10 No. 1351739 >>1351738 Reality you fucking goober.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)19:49:36 No. 1351741 the funniest part is he's a pro russia shill and the origin of sanctuary cities is american disapproval of vietnam >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)20:03:35 No. 1351743 cam'ron.jpg >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)20:05:23 No. 1351745 >>1351739 You don't live in reality though. You live in a world of clickbait headlines and fake news.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)20:12:09 No. 1351747 >>1351745 Sure thing dude. So why hasn't Biden closed the border and deported all of these illegals?>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)21:46:26 No. 1351763 >>1351577 Why would you pay to house migrants at all? If they can't pay for a hotel room send them back to where they came.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)21:57:42 No. 1351768 >>1351747 >So why hasn't Biden closed the border The border isn't open. >deported all of these illegals? Deporting millions of illegals is a dumbfuck CHUD dream with no foundation in reality. The Trump wall doesn't even approach the incredible stupidity of such a comical idea as sending hundreds of thousands of feds kicking down doors all over the country to detain millions of people. Its like living in Trumpworld has turned you peoples' brain to soup.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)22:05:40 No. 1351772 >>1351668 >"legal" "refugees" Do you think immigration is illegal?>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)22:06:34 No. 1351773 >>1351768 >hundreds of thousands of feds kicking down doors all over the country to detain millions of people. I'd settle for just deporting them whenever they commit another crime, you know, besides crossing the border illegally>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)22:44:16 No. 1351780 >>1351768 They're getting deported. And you're going to prison.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)22:46:11 No. 1351782 >>1351773 >I'd settle for just deporting them whenever they commit another crime, you know, besides crossing the border illegally You haven't addressed the absolute childish silliness of thinking even such a policy would be legal. States have no constitutional obligation to cooperate with feds. I have no clue what legal loophole CHUDs think they can jump through to enable basically a federal invasion of U.S. cities. This is not even bring up the absurdity of imagining that the federal government has the man-power, time or facilities to detain millions of people. Of all the retarded CHUD wet dreams the "mass deportation" dumbfuckery is by far the most brain dead.>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)22:46:45 No. 1351783 >>1351780 CHUD headcanon is wild>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)22:51:04 No. 1351785 >>1351783 Imagine fucking up the country so badly that your defense is "it's just too bad to fix.">>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)23:35:16 No. 1351793 >>1351733 when they voted against the wall and for biden >>1351736 sanctuary cities are 100% voting for illegals. if an illegal is picked up for fucking jaywalking they shouldn't even get a trial, they should be given to ice and put on the first plane to Guatemala>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)23:36:26 No. 1351794 >>1351747 good question >>1351768 >The border isn't open. 3 highest years for illegals on record were 2021-2023>Deporting millions of illegals is a dumbfuck CHUD dream with no foundation in reality. if we were able to round up all the japs and put them into camps there is no reason why we can't round up all the illegals>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)23:38:42 No. 1351795 >>1351772 the obongo and biden both spent their entire times as presidents flying in planefuls of third worders under the guise of "refugees" and "temporary protected status". pretty sure biden set the record for most TPS in a year https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/03/29/how-temporary-protected-status-has-expanded-under-the-biden-administration/ there is literally no reason for them to be doing this either, dems just want to replace white people with third worlders >>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)23:40:24 No. 1351796 >>1351782 weird that you fags are ok with the feds banning guns or Executive Order 9066 but you draw the line when it comes to evil criminal invaders>>
Anonymous 10/10/24(Thu)23:52:01 No. 1351800 >>1351794 >3 highest years for illegals on record were 2021-2023 So if 3 people jump over my fence one year and the next year 8 people jump over that means my yard is "open"? Your definition of "open" makes no sense. >if we were able to round up all the japs and put them into camps there is no reason why we can't round up all the illegals Firstly, that was also illegal. Secondly, the number of Japanese interned was around 100,000. 100,000 is significantly less than several million. >>1351796 >weird that you fags are ok with the feds banning guns or Executive Order 9066 but you draw the line when it comes to evil criminal invaders Pretty neat strawmanning you got going on.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)00:03:06 No. 1351801 >>1351800 >So if 3 people jump over my fence one year and the next year 8 people jump over that means my yard is "open"? Your definition of "open" makes no sense. that is such a fucking strawman argument reddit spacer. brandon allowing the most illegals per year on record for 3 straight years and suing texas to cut down the razor wire and then waiting until 6 months before the election is 100% open borders. Trump had the number down almost to zero in 2020 with his remain in mexico policy >Firstly, that was also illegal. fucking weird because all those communist new deal activist judges who ruined America you suck off said it was fine at the time https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korematsu_v._United_States>Secondly, the number of Japanese interned was around 100,000. 100,000 is significantly less than several million. and yet you think you will confiscate millions of guns. first deport all the dacas, they were registered with the government and then when someone is arrested if they can't prove citizenship put them on the next flight to El Salvador to be put into a concentration camp run by MS13 and ban kids from going to school/college if they can't prove citizenship>Pretty neat strawmanning you got going on. dems want to ban guns. both harris and walz say they want an awb with harris having said she wants confiscation. dems literally put japanese Americans in concentration camps and suck off FDR when all his statues should be torn down >>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)00:04:25 No. 1351802 Say it with me everyone:>47th PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, DONALD J. TRUMP! >>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)00:12:03 No. 1351803 >>1351801 >brandon allowing the most illegals per year on record for 3 straight years and suing texas to cut down the razor wire and then waiting until 6 months before the election is 100% open borders. The border isn't open. When I ask you what "open" means you just say "well a lot of people came in". That makes no sense. That's not what "open" means. Also, Republicans wrote the border bill and McConnell helped to push it through so nothing you're saying maps onto reality. You're just making shit up.>Trump had the number down almost to zero in 2020 with his remain in mexico policy Fucking kek. You are absolutely delusional. Show me the stat where the number of border crossings in 2020 was almost zero. I'd love to see it. >and yet you think you will confiscate millions of guns. You're arguing with someone who exists only in your head. Nobody said anything about guns but you.>dems want to ban guns. both harris and walz say they want an awb with harris having said she wants confiscation You aren't arguing with dems or walz or harris. You're arguing with me. You've accused me of being a hypocrite for wanting to ban guns but you made that opinion up in your head because you're a fucking basket case. The only person who mentioned guns is you.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)00:18:29 No. 1351805 >>1351803 >The border isn't open. When I ask you what "open" means you just say "well a lot of people came in". a record number of illegals came 3 in each of the first 3 years of brandon's presidency and he brought in a record number of "refugees"/"tps" so yeah, the border is open and brandon and the dems are literally trying to replace white people with third worlders. >Fucking kek. You are absolutely delusional. Show me the stat where the number of border crossings in 2020 was almost zero. I'd love to see it. https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/480/cpsprodpb/164A4/production/_125700319_optimised-us_migrants-nc.png.webp look at how low it was under trump. remain in mexico, cages and taking the kids works. >You're arguing with someone who exists only in your head. Nobody said anything about guns but you. don't lie, reddit spacer>You're arguing with someone who exists only in your head. Nobody said anything about guns but you. you 100% want to ban guns because you are a piece of shit commie who wants open borders and who wants to flood the US with third world criminal scumbags >>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)00:24:59 No. 1351806 >>1351803 >When I ask you what "open" means you just say "well a lot of people came in". That makes no sense. Trump's Stay in Mexico policy was revoked by the biden admin. If an asylum seeker comes here (they are all asylum seekers), we give them a hearing date and let them into the interior. Nobody comes to their hearing. They disappear. >>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)00:28:37 No. 1351808 >>1351806 >Nobody comes to their hearing. They disappear. >https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2018/jun/26/wolf-blitzer/majority-undocumented-immigrants-show-court-data-s/ >According to Justice Department data from the last five available years, around 60 to 75 percent of non-detained migrants have attended their immigration court proceedings. That’s determined by subtracting the percentage of judgments entered against migrants in their absence (known as an in absentia ruling) from total judgments entered Uh oh. Caught lying again huh?>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)00:32:02 No. 1351810 >>1351808 Quick question: how do they actually know how many migrants are actually inside the interior?>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)00:32:20 No. 1351811 >>1351805 >>1351805 >a record number of illegals came 3 in each of the first 3 years of brandon's presidency and he brought in a record number of "refugees"/"tps" so yeah So, again, your schizo definition of "open" means "well a lot of people came in". It makes no sense. Repeating the claim over and over isn't going to make it any sense. >look at how low it was under trump. remain in mexico, cages and taking the kids works. Lol oh cool, so you were just lying. Border crossings were nowhere near 0 in 2020.>don't lie, reddit spacer If you're hearing voices in your head that says everyone you talk to wants to ban guns when they've said nothing about it you should see a psychiatrist. >you 100% want to ban guns because you are a piece of shit commie who wants open borders and who wants to flood the US with third world criminal scumbags You need anti-psychotic medication. You're literally arguing against a bunch of shit you made up in your head.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)00:33:30 No. 1351812 >>1351810 You said migrants don't show up to their court dates. How the fuck do they have court dates if the U.S. doesn't know they're here? Lets not pivot away from the fact that the claim was a bold faced lie. The majority of undetained migrants show up to their hearings.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)00:37:48 No. 1351815 >>1351812 >How the fuck do they have court dates if the U.S. doesn't know they're here? Anon, they don't even know if the names they are given are actually real. Many of them show up without documents, or in some cases, with US SSNs. We factually have no fucking idea how many immigrants are let inside the interior, so how do you think we know that a abject percentage show up to their hearings? Do you think we chip them like dogs or something?>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)00:37:54 No. 1351816 >>1351808 >>1351810 >>1351806 the whole >muh migrants show up for their court date literally has not been true under biden. in 2023 69% of asylum cases resulted in removal by absentia, aka the illegals did not show up to court https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN12318 https://tracfed.syr.edu/tracker/dynadata/2024_06/R48078.pdf https://cis.org/Arthur/Massive-Spike-Immigration-Court-NoShows https://cis.org/Arthur/Immigration-Court-NoShows-Soar-FY-2024 suck my fucking dick you lying piece of shit >>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)00:39:41 No. 1351817 >>1351811 >So, again, your schizo definition of "open" means "well a lot of people came in". don't call them people. and brandon is doing nothing to keep them out. no barriers, no remain in mexico, no cages, no razor wire, landmines or machine guns>Lol oh cool, so you were just lying. Border crossings were nowhere near 0 in 2020. look at how much lower they were in 2020 you lying piece of shit. the cages, remain in mexico and taking the kids worked>If you're hearing voices in your head that says everyone you talk to wants to ban guns when they've said nothing about it you should see a psychiatrist. >You need anti-psychotic medication. You're literally arguing against a bunch of shit you made up in your head. post medical credentials, reddit spacer>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)00:40:35 No. 1351818 >>1351812 see>>1351816 69% of illegals don't show up for their court dates. eat my entire ass you lying piece of shit>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)03:18:14 No. 1351829 >>1351815 >We factually have no fucking idea how many immigrants are let inside the interior, so how do you think we know that a abject percentage show up to their hearings? Do you think we chip them like dogs or something? I can see you're desperately coping to come up with a reason why the department of justice figures are wrong - as if you've somehow outsmarted an entire institution by saying "BUT WHAT IF MUH NAMES ARENT REAL". The fact remains that the majority of undetained immigrants who are given hearings show up for those hearings. Unless you have some actual data to prove that wrong you're just coping.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)03:26:41 No. 1351830 >>1351818 >>1351817 >>1351816 >Among the 231,095 total removal orders issued in FY2023 (Figure 1), 69% (159,379) were in absentia removal orders. So, just if anyone needs more convincing that schizo gun nut is an actual lying faggot of monumental proportions, this 69% figure he's been repeating for months is a lie. The 69% figure is only a study of the removal cases, not total cases - meaning that this figure doesn't even include the migrants who showed up for their hearings. Its like saying 70% of the high schoolers at the dance got kicked out for drinking when actual data says that, of the high schoolers who were kicked out of the dance, 70% of them were kicked out for drinking. Remember, /news/, if schizo gun nut is talking, confidently believe the opposite of whatever comes out of his dumbfuck mouth. He even posted the stats so he read it and is consciously aware he's lying. The worst part is I actually wasted time out of my brief existence on this earth proving that schizo gun nut is a lying pile of mentally ill human trash for the 1098298th time on this board.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)04:17:23 No. 1351834 >>1351577 The rich's expensive cattle paid for with taxpayer money.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)04:19:22 No. 1351835 >>1351615 you voted to bring them in so expect to have to house them, you can't be a hypocrite retard and say I love migrants I want them in the country oh but not my state.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)04:22:37 No. 1351836 >>1351812 republicans should give each migrant a squatting rights instruction manual and bus them over to california next. I hope you get your home squatted in, don't you dare touch those migrants either or expect to be tossed into prison libshit criminal scum.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)04:45:41 No. 1351840 >>1351609 Trump hired illegals to build its tower, Trump can look after them all. If you have a problem, take it up with the GOP and the orange tard's enablers who allow Trump to exist.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)06:04:41 No. 1351846 >>1351840 stop being racist libshit and enjoy your new neighbours. If you don't want them so much you shouldn't of voted for biden. Its your fault.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)06:09:59 No. 1351847 >shouldn't of Esl>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)06:26:55 No. 1351848 >>1351847 grammar nazis are illiterate retards who can't argue. your parents should've died as well for raising filth like you.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)06:42:58 No. 1351849 I got dirt on you doggie >>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)07:15:08 No. 1351850 >>1351810 They don't. They estimate some laughably low number of "gotaways" which is still in the millions and pretend it counts. Realistically, the only way you're actually going to close the border is to start arresting the NGOs aiding and abetting them, along with all of the other leftist accomplices in the country>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)07:30:37 No. 1351855 >>1351850 How did you get to be this far right? And what makes you think anyone else is also that far right?>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)08:04:09 No. 1351865 >>1351855 I watched as the left subverted every western institution for four decades and realized that live and let live isn't a realistic survival strategy for the species. I doubt there are many people realistically looking at solutions to the leftist problem right now, but that can change practically over night. You freaks still celebrate the Weimar Republic as a golden age, after all, and that didn't last very long.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)08:41:04 No. 1351867 >>1351865 How do you deal with being outnumbered when 90%+ of society is a "leftist" by your own far right standards?>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)08:46:16 No. 1351868 >>1351866 Sure, if you were a sexual degenerate, a bolshevik, or didn't have to worry about money.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)08:47:42 No. 1351869 >>1351867 I'm patient.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)09:01:27 No. 1351873 >>1351868 >degenerate And there it is, a nazi buzzword, we all knew it was coming.>>1351869 The number of people who agree with you will shrink precipitously as the boomers continue to die off.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)09:14:47 No. 1351874 >>1351873 >boomers lmao>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)09:16:03 No. 1351875 >>1351872 I'm sure your next glorious revolution will be the one that finally makes things click.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)09:27:46 No. 1351883 >>1351875 Is kamala the evil corporate establishment or an evil revolutionary communist? Why can't you retards form a cohesive argument>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)09:30:39 No. 1351885 >>1351868 >muh degeneracy Don't you ever get tired of raiding this board?>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)09:33:23 No. 1351886 >>1351885 Do you ever get tired of grooming children?>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)09:35:59 No. 1351887 Someone is projecting >>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)09:42:50 No. 1351888 >>1351598 If Republicans are guilty of shipping illegals to NY then Democrats are guilty of shipping illegals to TX in the first place.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)09:43:48 No. 1351889 >>1351888 Texas didn't have to move into mexico and establish a republic in the first place>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)09:50:01 No. 1351890 >>1351886 I don't, unlike you. https://www.dailykos.com/users/cajsalilliehook?filter=stories >>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)10:11:28 No. 1351892 >>1351886 You lot don't. But then https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/9/2/2191235/-Republican-Sexual-Predators-Abusers-and-Enablers-Pt-45>Part 45 https://www.military.com/video/off-duty/odd/akward-moments-with-vladimir-putin/3129473236001 In Soviet Russia and Rightist America, groomers are you. Accusations are Admissions. >>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)10:12:59 No. 1351893 >>1351874 Yes, boomers (You).>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)10:42:08 No. 1351907 >>1351892 Sure thing dude.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)10:47:11 No. 1351911 >>1351907 Are you pretending they're lying again so you can feel better about yourself?>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)10:58:15 No. 1351927 >>1351615 They're busing then to other areas of the country because their states are overburdened and are not sanctuary areas. Democrat cities that are sanctuary cities should follow the policy they voted for.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)11:00:41 No. 1351931 >>1351927 what the fuck is a "democrat city" ? do you honestly think there are cities with entirely democrats living in them?>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)11:01:17 No. 1351932 >>1351714 They represent a part of the city. And you cannot assume that the rest of NYC disagrees or agrees with them, because you don't know. What we do know is that several thousand people on Reddit who live in NYC don't like it. And we also know you're pedantic and a weenie.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)11:01:20 No. 1351934 >>1351931 It's his script, it's not like he's ever been to americs>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)12:41:34 No. 1351991 >>1351907 >Sure thing >>1351907 never gets tired of grooming children>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)13:21:09 No. 1351996 >>1351830 this post was made at 10:26 am jewish time, 12:56 pm indian time. suck my entire dick you lying piece of shit. you got btfo'd. in 2014 there were 26,000 removal by absentia orders, in 2023 there were nearly 160,000. https://www.justice.gov/d9/pages/attachments/2020/02/04/20_in_absentia_removal_orders_0.pdf only 31,775 asylum cases were granted. that means 5 illegals didn't show up for court for every 1 illegal who was granted asylum https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN12318 Let's look at the northern triangle, where the illegals are coming from el salvador 7% approval rate, 77% didn't fucking show up to court Guatamala 8% approval rate, 77% didn't fucking show up to court honduras 7% approval rate 74% didn't fucking show up to court https://www.justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1107366/dl as we can see here, this is a uniquely biden/harris admin problem because biden and harris are bad at their jobs and are just letting illegals come in and roam free. to conclude, you are a shill, a piece of shit, a liar, need to suck my cock and 5 times as many illegals skipped going to court in 2023 as were granted asylum and also you have no dick >>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)13:23:28 No. 1351997 as if we needed any more proof of his mental illness >>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)13:35:23 No. 1352000 >>1351996 Extremely good post>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)13:36:23 No. 1352001 >>1352000 thank you>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)14:22:51 No. 1352013 >>1351931 A Democrat run city, like NYC, Chicago, etc. lots of them, but not all, are sanctuary cities. And of course not everyone living there is a Democrat, don't be a pedantic little fuck. The voting majority is Democrat, hence it is a Democrat run city. >>1351934 I'm American. Sorry you're so paranoid that you think differing opinions must be the work of a shill. I'm born and raised in the USA. I think you need to get the fuck off the internet for a while.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)14:24:20 No. 1352014 >>1351996 Interesting post. Some good reading here. Also>suck my entire dick Kek, can someone suck part of your dick? Like the side of it?>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)14:27:29 No. 1352016 >>1351931 if the mayor and most of if not all of the council is democrat, its a democrat city. most cities are run by democrats since they rig elections in cities a lot. see Tammany Hall and gangs of new york or the fact dems got caught rigging the last nyc mayor election>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)14:32:06 No. 1352019 >>1352001 Any time>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)14:37:22 No. 1352021 >>1352016 I'm curious how many republicans you think live in new york city.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)14:57:00 No. 1352023 >>1352013 >I'm American Those who need to say 'I'm American' aren't Americans.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)15:07:56 No. 1352026 >>1351997 >get absolutely btfo'd with sources >seethe and call the guy who blew you the fuck out mentally ill kek>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)15:08:58 No. 1352027 >>1352026 you really should stop samefagging>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)15:18:44 No. 1352031 >>1352027 you should really stop lying on the internet when its so easy to btfo you with sources>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)15:22:37 No. 1352032 >>1352031 we're anonymous, my only source is the fact that you're an extremely obvious samefag>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)15:30:44 No. 1352036 here he goes obsessing over genitals again >>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)22:03:31 No. 1352090 >>1351996 All of the data you're linking only examines removal orders, not total cases. You just dishonestly cite the same data over again. Even the graph you just posted is just removal orders and what percentage of those removal orders were issued for in absentia. It doesn't include total cases and ignores the some odd 300,000 cases that were heard but still pending decision. The DOJ statistics here prove you're full of shit. >https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/measuring-absentia-removal-immigration-court Lie as many times as you want, schizo gun nut. We've all been aware of your existence as a low IQ paid dipshit rat fuck shill on this board for a long time.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)22:07:06 No. 1352091 >>1352035 >>1352031 >>1352026 >>1352019 >>1352001 >>1352000 >https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/measuring-absentia-removal-immigration-court >Table 1 provides the findings from this analysis. Each of these three methods yielded a different in absentia rate for nondetained immigrants during the period from 2008 to 2018. >First, using the government’s IJ decisions method, the in absentia rate was 34%. >Second, using the all completions method, the in absentia rate was 27%. >Third, using the all matters method, the in absentia rate was 17%. >When the same data were analyzed using the government’s IJ decisions method, nondetained immigrants appear to miss court much more often. The government measurement is twice as high as the all matters approach—34% of the time compared to just 17% of the time. That means that under the all matters approach, immigrants have appeared for all scheduled hearings in 83% of all pending and completed cases over an 11-year period. >Of the three methods, the all matters method is the most reliable measurement of the rate at which immigrants appear in court. First, unlike the government’s IJ decisions method, the all matters method includes all judicial decisions, including decisions to administratively close a case, in its analysis. Because administrative closure reached a rate as high as one-fourth of all initial case completions from 2008–2018, the failure to include such closures makes the government method significantly less inclusive of what is happening in immigration court. >https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN12318 >Among the 231,095 total removal orders issued in FY2023 (Figure 1), 69% (159,379) were in absentia Schizo gun net caught lying. Again. Who could've guessed.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)22:10:55 No. 1352092 >>1352091 >>1352090 only 31,775 asylum cases were granted. that means 5 illegals didn't show up for court for every 1 illegal who was granted asylum only 31,775 asylum cases were granted. that means 5 illegals didn't show up for court for every 1 illegal who was granted asylum suck my entire dick you lying piece of shit. you got btfo'd. also weird, both of your posts were made just before 7:30 am indian time>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)22:13:13 No. 1352093 >>1352091 >>1352092 >>1352090 oh, and fucking again you are trying to hide behind data from 2008-2018. You can literally fucking see on the graph illegals stopped showing up to their trials in 2019 and kicked it into high gear in 2022 and 2023. https://www.justice.gov/d9/pages/attachments/2020/02/04/20_in_absentia_removal_orders_0.pdf you are intentionally lying by using the wrong years, you piece of shit >>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)22:35:23 No. 1352096 >>1351829 >The fact remains that the majority of undetained immigrants who are given hearings show up for those hearings. You literally, factually cannot know this. Not even the border patrol know how many people enter the border. And they run into the same mules registered under different aliases dozens of times.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)22:54:44 No. 1352097 >>1352092 >only 31,775 asylum cases were granted. that means 5 illegals didn't show up for court for every 1 illegal who was granted asylum "Granted" and "not granted" aren't the only two options you dishonest fuckhead. The numbers you cite don't include pending cases, dismissed cases or cases in which the petitioner leaves the country voluntarily. This information is in the graph YOU posted. >You can literally fucking see on the graph illegals stopped showing up to their trials in 2019 and kicked it into high gear in 2022 and 2023. Wrong. What you're seeing is an examination of strictly removal orders and what percentage of those removal orders were initiated because the immigrant didn't show up for court. It even says REMOVAL ORDERS at the very top of this graph you illiterate ESL pig fucker. The 69% number you've been citing is a lie. The source YOU POSTED proves its a lie. The number examines only removal orders, not total cases or amount of cases still pending. >you piece of shit Your existence is a joke and nobody takes you seriously. You've been caught lying too many times.>>1352096 >You literally, factually cannot know this. You literally, factually can. Its all there in the DOJ data.>Not even the border patrol know how many people enter the border. And they run into the same mules registered under different aliases dozens of times. This is a great theory, anon, but you just pulled this out of your ass. The DOJ keeps records and data of asylum seekers and legal status petitioners and the data conclusively shows that the majority of immigrants show up for their court hearings. I don't know if you're actually sub 40 IQ or you're just completely uneducated on the process but applying for status in the U.S. requires documentation. Immigrants can't just show up and say whatever name they want and get a hearing. That isn't how it works.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)23:04:39 No. 1352101 >>1352096 its factually fucking wrong too >>1351996 >>1351816 . 69% of all illegals did not show up for court dates in 2023>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)23:14:07 No. 1352105 >>1352097 >The DOJ keeps records and data of asylum seekers and legal status petitioners and the data conclusively shows- The DOJ doesn't even know how many illegal immigrants are living inside the United States, retard.>>
Anonymous 10/11/24(Fri)23:19:52 No. 1352107 >>1352097 >"Granted" and "not granted" aren't the only two options you dishonest fuckhead. The numbers you cite don't include pending cases, dismissed cases or cases in which the petitioner leaves the country voluntarily. This information is in the graph YOU posted. the info from the graph I posted shows the majority of illegals in 2023 did not attend their court dates. keep seething and posting numbers from 10 years ago>Wrong. What you're seeing is an examination of strictly removal orders and what percentage of those removal orders were initiated because the immigrant didn't show up for court. It even says REMOVAL ORDERS at the very top of this graph you illiterate ESL pig fucker. The 69% number you've been citing is a lie. The source YOU POSTED proves its a lie. The number examines only removal orders, not total cases or amount of cases still pending. there are literally raw numbers on the graph and chart you piece of shit illegals are not showing up for their court dates and its spiked right after that bullshit 2008-2018 stat you cite. https://cis.org/Arthur/Immigration-Court-NoShows-Soar-FY-2024 https://cis.org/Arthur/Massive-Spike-Immigration-Court-NoShows again in 2018, the highest year you cite 46,207 illegals didn't appear in court, 2012, the lowest year you cite 19,430 illegals didn't show up to court. In 2023 that number was 159,379 illegals who did not show up to court. you are full of shit, lying and trying to hide behind old stats. even fucking illegal lovers you are the only one arguing this by the way. even the rest of the open borders crowd admits illegals aren't showing up to court and blames it on lack of lawyers and the court system being hostile. regardless, the illegals have shown they cannot be trusted in the interior and need to either remain in mexico or be placed in concentration camps while awaiting trial also we shouldn't give them food or water when they are in the camps >>
Anonymous 10/12/24(Sat)12:51:51 No. 1352195 >>1352143 suck my balls, the DoJ's own website shows no shows at court went from 46k in 2018, the last of the years lying faggot keep citing, to 160k in 2024. https://www.justice.gov/d9/pages/attachments/2020/02/04/20_in_absentia_removal_orders_0.pdf >>
Anonymous 10/12/24(Sat)19:32:15 No. 1352283 >>1351577 Maybe elect different people who make different decisions>>
Anonymous 10/13/24(Sun)10:32:40 No. 1352444 >>1351996 Take your meds tourist>>
Anonymous 10/13/24(Sun)10:42:49 No. 1352457 >>1352283 for what? everything went exactly as planned>>
Anonymous 10/15/24(Tue)08:07:10 No. 1353154 >>1352143 Sorry, I couldn't find any links on trans.org>>1351598 Where did those migrants come from? Who voted to have all of those migrants invade Texas in the first place? >>1351602 We want migrants out of our state. We want to build a wall but NYC voted to stop us. We want to deport them but NYC voted to stop that too. So the only option left is sending them to NYC. If NYC doesn't like it then they can start voting to secure the border and stop allowing unlimited "refugees">>
Anonymous 10/15/24(Tue)08:07:45 No. 1353155 >>1353154 >We You aren't even American>>
Anonymous 10/15/24(Tue)21:33:08 No. 1353377 >>1353155 >you think Americans should make good wages and have affordable housing? >heh, that must mean you're secretly a Russian/Chinese bot!!! why are so many leftists on this board complete schizos?>>
Anonymous 10/15/24(Tue)21:41:35 No. 1353379 >>1353377 You don't have to be a leftist to know you aren't American.>>
real Arab semite 10/26/24(Sat)16:16:20 No. 1356535 God bless NY.
Delete Post: [ File Only] Style: Yotsuba Yotsuba B Futaba Burichan Tomorrow Photon
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.