DOJ laughs at failed democrat assassin Ryan Routh, who filed a motion trying to dismiss Aileen Canon from the trump caseI wonder who's giving him money to pay attorneys to file these motions because the dude is broke afhttps://www.newsweek.com/ryan-routh-aileen-cannon-partiality-doj-response-1974664How Trump's Would-Be Assassin Forced Government's Hand on Aileen CannonRouth, the man accused of the second assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump in Florida, has forced the federal government to comment on Judge Aileen Cannon's impartiality when overseeing his classified documents case.The suspect, accused of planning to shoot the Republican presidential candidate at Trump International Golf Club West Palm Beach on September 15, filed a 10-page motion last week asking for the judge to recuse herself.Trump was facing 40 federal charges in Cannon's court over his alleged handling of sensitive materials seized from his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, after leaving the White House in January 2021. He was also accused of obstructing efforts by federal authorities to retrieve them.Cannon dismissed all charges after ruling that special counsel Jack Smith, the chief prosecutor, was illegally appointed.Routh said he wanted that because Cannon was appointed by Trump and therefore could not be impartial, citing her dismissal of the case, which was filed in her district."This motion presumes that this Court would preside over this case impartially," the October 17 filing reads. "However, given the heightened stakes and the public scrutiny, there should not be any doubts about even the appearance of impartiality of the presiding judge."Routh's attorneys also said that Trump has repeatedly praised Cannon for dismissing the case in July.Jack Smith asked only for the dismissal to be reversed so that it could be heard. He did not seek to have the case assigned to a different judge based on partiality concerns.
"There is no support whatsoever for the contention that a judge can be disqualified based simply on the identity of the President who appointed him," a quote from Straw v. United States in the DOJ's three-page response reads.The DOJ went on to say that Routh provided no legal or factual basis for Cannon, or the court, to disqualify itself.When Newsweek reached out for comment, the DOJ deferred to its filing.Routh responded on Wednesday, complaining that the department had not "meaningfully" responded to his petition and that Cannon could see a promotion if Trump is elected president, referring to reports that her name is on a list of potential picks for U.S. attorney general.Routh is scheduled to stand trial beginning November 18, less than two weeks after Election Day. The 58-year-old was charged by the DOJ with possession of a firearm while a former felon, and possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number.He did not fire any shots on September 15 but fled after a Secret Service agent spotted a rifle sticking out near a fence a few holes ahead of where Trump was playing. Routh was arrested later that day.
Confirmed psyop to pave way for keeping her on the classified documents case when they court of appeals reinstates the charges
OP's off Zer meds again.
>>1356117he was shitposting all day yesterday
How is someone who is a would-be presidential assassin (and a Biden supporter) even allowed to file a motion to dismiss a judge in someone else's case?
he's making threads again
>>1356134Cannon is the judge in both cases, oddly enough.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/crime/2024/10/18/ryan-routh-man-accused-of-trying-to-kill-donald-trump-asks-judge-aileen-cannon-to-recuse-herself/75730659007/>Cannon's decision to recuse herself would also squash suspicions that she was deliberately assigned to the case, Militello said. Routh's case marks the third time Cannon was selected to oversee a case involving Trump, a coincidence some have described as "remarkable.">"To be clear, there is no evidence that this case (or any other) was assigned in a non-random manner," the attorney wrote. "But conspiracy theories have been based on less."So yeah, this is the third time.https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64911367/trump-v-united-states-government/https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490070/united-states-v-trump/https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69192558/united-states-v-routh/
>>1356175...but he filed a motion for another case. Or is he trying to get canon removed from his own case?
>>1356190It's his own case. Don't take OP at face value. He lies to get attention.
>>1356192So the would-be trump assassin is just a salty dem then?
>>1356202Salty dem noticing things. Cannon could recuse herself no prob but she wants that promotion pretty bad it seems.
>>1356203Why would she
>leftoids taking the side of the attempted assassin and peddling his nonsense conspiracy theoryShocker
>>1356475There are only reasons for recusal if one were to consider that she wasn't a piece of shit.So no reasons for recusal given the reality that she's a piece of shit.
>>1356475Canon 2: A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the APPEARANCE of Impropriety in all Activities[...]A judge should neither lend the prestige of the judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge or others nor CONVEY or permit others to convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence the judge.https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/code-conduct-united-states-judges#c
>>1356500Cool so since she's not doing that everything is good
>>1356525Notice the other part too:(A) Respect for Law. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.How many judges does the Southen District of Florida have? Eighteen.If a random drawing picks the same judge out of eighteen three times in a row that should seriously undermine public confidence in the judiciary. There's a perfect person with a perfect way to repair this though. But she's not doin' it.
>>1356527>Respect for Law. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.Cool so we're all good then there's no problems
