The conservative think tank told prospective donors that the project was part of its work to combat antisemitismhttps://forward.com/news/686797/heritage-foundation-wikipedia-antisemitism/The Heritage Foundation plans to “identify and target” volunteer editors on Wikipedia who it says are “abusing their position” by publishing content the group believes to be antisemitic, according to documents obtained by the Forward.Employees of Heritage, the conservative think tank that produced the Project 2025 policy blueprint for the second Trump administration, said they plan to use facial recognition software and a database of hacked usernames and passwords in order to identify contributors to the online encyclopedia, who mostly work under pseudonyms. It’s not clear exactly what kind of antisemitism the Wikipedia effort, which has not been previously reported, is intended to address. But in recent months some Jewish groups have complained about a series of changes on the website relating to Israel, the war in Gaza and its repercussions.In June, a panel of Wikipedia editors declared the Anti-Defamation League a “generally unreliable” source of information about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, limiting when the organization can be cited in Wikipedia articles. And there was an outcry this fall among some Jewish scholars and pro-Israel activists over edits to Wikipedia’s entry for Zionism to add references to “colonization.”Wikipedia has also recently drawn ire from right-wing figures including Elon Musk, the billionaire who has been by President-elect Trump’s side during much of the transition. Musk posted on X (formerly Twitter) in December: “Stop donating to Wokepedia.”A Heritage Foundation spokesperson said she was not able to answer questions about the organization’s work related to Wikipedia, which editors it was seeking to identify or how it sought to “target” them. The Wikimedia Foundation, which provides the infrastructure for Wikipedia, declined to comment.
The Heritage Foundation sent the pitch deck outlining the Wikipedia initiative to Jewish foundations and other prospective supporters of Project Esther, its roadmap for fighting antisemitism and anti-Zionism. The slideshow says the group’s “targeting methodologies” would include creating fake Wikipedia user accounts to try to trick editors into identifying themselves by sharing personal information or clicking on malicious tracking links that can identify people who click on them. It is unclear whether this has begun.Tamzin Hadasa Kelly, a prolific Wikipedia editor, said that the methods mentioned in the Heritage document were familiar, and that Wikipedia editors know that it can be difficult to maintain their anonymity.“It’s scary they want to do this, but it’s not a ‘zero day,’” Kelly said in an interview, referring to the hacking methods that the intended victim is unaware of before they occur.>Allegations of biasWikipedia has long faced claims from conservatives that it has a liberal bias. Chaya Raichik, the Orthodox former real estate broker behind “Libs of TikTok,” has assailed Wikimedia’s spending on diversity programming, for example. And a June study from the right-leaning Manhattan Institute found a “mild to moderate tendency” for Wikipedia to more negatively describe some conservative public figures.Several prominent Jewish groups have also expressed concern that Wikipedia is tilted against Israel. A World Jewish Congress has released a report in March said the site’s articles about the Israel-Hamas war were biased in “terminology, framing and lack of context, one-sided sources and critical omissions,” while Aish.com, an Orthodox news website, said in November that it had been “hijacked by digital jihadists.”
In May, the Los Angeles Jewish Journal ran a cover story titled “Wokepedia?” that described “seven tactics Wikipedia editors used to spread anti-Israel bias.” The article said that the term “anti-imperialism” had been added to the Hamas page as one of the Palestinian terror group’s ideologies, and the term “antisemitism” removed. Neither term is currently on the Hamas page; editors frequently discuss and change the content of controversial articles.>Campaign would be unusualThe Heritage Foundation told prospective donors the project would be led in part by Tom Olohon, a former FBI agent, and noted that he had won a SHIELD award from the ADL in 2015.The ADL did not respond to a request for comment about Wikipedia, the Heritage Foundation project, or the group’s mention of its award in fundraising efforts. After Wikipedia declared it an unreliable source on Israel and Zionism in June, ADL rallied more than 40 Jewish groups to oppose the site’s decision and stated that “Wikipedia is stripping the Jewish community of the right to defend itself.”The appeal was directed to the Wikimedia Foundation, which said that it does not interfere in decisions made by Wikipedia’s volunteer editors.The ADL had faced backlash in 2021 after several of its staff members were found to be editing Wikipedia entries on domestic extremism to add information about the organization’s research. The site’s rules generally discourage editing aimed at promoting an organization the editor works for, but an ADL spokesperson said at the time that its employees had followed the rules by disclosing that they worked for the group.
“Doxxing,” or unmasking the identity of anonymous editors in Wikipedia, violates the site’s rules and can result in users being banned, according to the site’s guidelines. Kelly, who has been a volunteer editor on the site since 2012 with a focus that includes sexuality and religion, and serves as an administrator, said that in the past, such problems have usually been rooted in interpersonal conflicts or ad hoc online campaignsA well-funded campaign against individual Wikipedia editors by an organization like the Heritage Foundation, which is one of the most prominent conservative think tanks in the country, it seems, would be a first.Molly White, an independent journalist and Wikipedia contributor who wrote an article last week describing “the right’s war on Wikipedia,” said Heritage’s plan to target editors was concerning: “The document is sort of vague about what they would do once they ID a person,” she noted, “but the things that come to mind are not great.”
>>1373105They're not fascists guys. Fox News told me so!
>>1373117Funniest part is that these wannabe dictators still can't stop sucking Israeli dick. Wonder what gunschizo will think?
Why don't these retards just use conservapedia lmao
>>1373118I'm so glad I use a VPN and my pseudonym[sic](see my name faggery)when I antisemitically editorialize using my Wikipedia account
>>1373117They are not, literally no one forces you to use wikipedia
>>1373142All the rest of the "pedias" cost $. If I'm going to get woke misinformation, I want it for free(there is no free lunch).
>>1373105>said they plan to use facial recognition software and a database of hacked usernames and passwords in order to identify contributors to the online encyclopediaHow long has wiki required facial login? Where's this biometric data coming from, and how is it being checked?>>1373139>I'm so glad I use a VPNCongratulations, you've shielded yourself from your ISP.
>>1373154>Tfw Republicans admit they've actually been keeping facial databases of americans for retaliatory purposes this whole time
>>1373156K. So that's where the data came from. Now how is it being checked? How are they linking the wiki login to the biometric data?
>>1373105Wikipedia plans to "identify and target the Israel first foreign agents that work for The Heritage Foundation to subvert America and are actively pushing Anti-Christian content".
>>1373167Nah
>>1373228No one gives a shit about the Jewish heritage foundation. Wikipedia is a kike fest too. It's basically Jews calling other Jews anti-Semitic.
>>1373142That doesn't make any sense.
>>1373105Man, I just love the right pretending they don't like antisemitism. Just hilarious. And retards believe it too!>>1373158If I had to guess, using the username and log-in information to find their face elsewhere on the internet.
>>1373142By that logic why can't Heritage just build a more popular wiki?
>>1373324Apparently they already have all the faces. So I hear. I woulda saids 'how' on linking back from login dets but the average spastic makes that crap really easy. From an IRC username pointing me to a steam account, I was lookin' at the CIA spook's VIN number on they missus' rental Kia in half hour or so....Then, once they've linked the biometric data to the login, how is the biometrics planning on being used to perform the victimisation? I was thinkin' most o your CCTV setups are independantly operated, and I've not heard about roaming patrols... More importantly, how does this not generate massive amounts of evidence as to it's existence when used?
>>1373324The right is full of zionists that literally worship jews and defend Israel at all costs. Only /pol/tards, an extreme minority, are antisemitic. Though, not antisemitic enough to stop supporting zionist politicians.
