It's never a good look when you attack a defenseless, senile old coothttps://thehill.com/policy/international/5074436-claudia-sheinbaum-trump-mexican-america/Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum dove into President-elect Trump’s chatter of geopolitical rearrangement Wednesday, proposing a name change for North America in response to Trump’s musings about the Gulf of Mexico.In a wide-ranging press conference Tuesday, Trump expounded on his aspirations of U.S. territorial expansion to Canada, Greenland and the Panama Canal, and proposed renaming the Gulf of Mexico the “Gulf of America.”Sheinbaum, in her daily morning press conference Wednesday, said the body of water shared by Cuba, Mexico and the United States is internationally recognized as the Gulf of Mexico, adding that North America was historically marked on maps as Mexican America.“I mean obviously ‘Gulf of Mexico,’ the name is recognized by the United Nations, an organism of the United Nations. But next, why don’t we call it ‘Mexican America’? It sounds nice, doesn’t it?” Sheinbaum said, waving to a historical map projected on a screen.“Since 1607,” Sheinbaum added, in an apparent reference to the map. “the Constitution of Apatzingán was for Mexican America, so we’re going to call it ‘Mexican America,’ it sounds nice, doesn’t it? And Gulf of Mexico, well, since 1607 and it’s also recognized internationally.”
>>1373172Renaming the gulf when you only control half of it is retarded. And also is just more senseless bullshit to cover up how Trump dropped every single policy he was elected on.
These are going to be 4 very stupid years. Thanks chuds and thanks apathetic voters that don't show up in November.
It's fun to watch mexico, denmark and canada seethe.>Y-YOU WON'T DO SHIT!Yeah, maybe. But you couldn't stop us if we tried. Pay your dues or we use the military, that makes up 80% of NATO, to turn you into a satellite. Maybe we take Canada first. Teach canadian women what sex with men is like.
>>1373176you're not american
>>1373177We're already paying to protect them anon. We might as well incorporate them.Conversations with denmark anons has been funny. They're threatening naval action with pontoon boats.
>>1373178>Trump declares invasion of Denmark>Picks fight with the entire EU>Plus half the US will be against the decision and possibly start a civil warThis is a terrible fucking idea and Trump's retarded for taking this bit any further than an obvious joke.
>>1373179>Picks fight with the entire EUWe're 66% of NATO. They do not have bargaining power, here. >Plus half the US will be against the decision and possibly start a civil warThe closest we've come to civil war was J6. Didn't happen. Certainly isn't going to happen over annexing countries that contribute nothing to the world. Also, all of this crying about national sovereignty is stupid. The EU has been flooding their country with pajeets, chinese and pakis for decades, threatening to arrest anybody who disagrees. What do they have left to defend? They let their children be raped and their land bought by foreigners. The sooner we annex them, the better.
>>1373184you keep saying we but we all know you're the paid shill who never stops posting here
>>1373185Is there something wrong shilling for nationalism and securing our sovereignty? Denmark would make a great naval base. And we already have bases there, too. We're practically family already.
Trump gets people talking to distract from being convicted of 34 felonies on the 10th
>>1373184Certainly IS going to happen over getting into an armed conflict we started. A bloodless annexation doesn't happen today; you can't buy a whole country. Either Trump will back off or he'll go to war.
>>1373186you're not american
>>1373172>Sheinbaumlol
>>1373185It is "WE". Except I am a Canadian who shills here for free. And you dirty Yankee scum can try and pry our precious Rae earths and oil from my cold live gingers
>>1373197Oopsy rare earths and oil from my cold live fingers(I hate phone typing)
>>1373197We are going to drink ALL your maple syrup.
>>1373197we will take your water and oil and plunder your strategic maple reserves and violate your fat women.
>>1373227>weanon, we all know you're not american
>>1373184>We're 66% of NATO. They do not have bargaining power, here.NATO isn't everything. It's just a coalition. Not everyone throws everything they've got into NATO.You're right, there's no bargining. You try it and you'll end up fucked up. You won't be facing NATO. You'll be facing every country in europe, every country that each country holds a treaty with, then there's the 90% of the rest of the world you've fucked with and have just given them an excuse to hop on with everyone else and get theri pound of flesh. Now would be a good time to look into how many other countries you've supplied with a reason, and start adding up all their military strength. One you can withstand. All? >The closest we've come to civil war was J6. Didn't happen. Certainly isn't going to happen over annexing countries that contribute nothing to the world. Right now you're a lot closer to a civil war than you was then. You're far more fractured, each side demonising the other. I'm personally hoping the inbound economic struggles and being unable to afford food will give it the push it needs.>Also, all of this crying about national sovereignty is stupid.Very.>The sooner we annex them, the better.For who? You gotta consider what would be lost. People over there have been educated so they actually understand this. They wouldn't accept moving backwards to your systems. You couldn't handle goatherders, what makes you think you can handle a few dozen first world countries equipped similar or better? Plus everyone else that hops onto the action 'cause swinging now is gonna cause the most damage...
