>>1392014
It's not "re-tweeted", bitch. It's re-Xed.

>>1392014
Did this retard really think comparing public sector workers to nazi soldiers was a good idea when he's literally in a position of power?

Either he's calling himself Hitler or Trump Hitler.

>>1392016
The US & FDR & Truman didn't defeat the Nazis, millions of public sector employees did.

>>1392015
Nah, it's "re-tweeted".

>>1392014
>--we are not making this up--
...neither is Elon Musk? Did you really think Hitler went around personally murdering all 6 million Jews by himself? Like, does anybody on the Left know anything about history?
lol, rhetorical question. These are the same people who tell us that the Nazis loved free speech and hated racism. Leftists are clueless about history.

>>1392053
Why single out public service workers though?

I'm inclined to agree with him. Wealthy white people lost nearly everything when SA let the monkeys run everything. SA is a lesson to the world.

>>1392056
because government employees were the ones doing the murdering for Stalin and Hitler. With Mao, a lot of the violence was by private citizens (acting with government approval) but there was still government violence as well.
The point is the worst things in history all happened with big powerful governments.

>>1392057
>Wealthy white people lost nearly everything when SA let the monkeys run everything
The average white household in SA has 20 times as much wealth as the average black household.

SA IS a lesson to the world. That lesson being you can't fix racial injustice without wealth seizure and redistribution and people that claim otherwise are sociopathic demons completely detached from reality that would claim their shadow victimized them to their reflection if they were the last person on earth.

>>1392067
>>>/x/

>>1392053
>>1392056
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_for_the_Restoration_of_the_Professional_Civil_Service
The primary objective of the law was to establish a "national" and "professional" civil service by dismissing certain groups of tenured civil servants. Individuals of non-Aryan origin, particularly those of Jewish descent, were compelled to retire, while members of the Communist Party or affiliated organizations were to be terminated from their positions. Additionally, the law forbade Jews, non-Aryans, and political opponents from holding positions as teachers, professors, judges, or within the government.

>>1392071
>Additionally, the law forbade Jews, non-Aryans, and political opponents from holding positions as teachers, professors, judges, or within the government
Damn, you mean like how Democrats discriminated against Whites, males, and conservatives in government positions especially as teachers and professors because they need to brainwash Zoomers to hate White men?

it's almost like leftists are the bad guys

>>1392073
i thought democrats were the party of the confederacy. remember when your shill farm told you to spam that

>>1392073
>in government positions especially as teachers and professors because they need to brainwash Zoomers to hate White men?
The majority of teachers and civil servants are women and people of color because Republicans hate serving their communities, not because people are refusing to hire white male conservatives.

On a related note, the majority of civil administrators (ie the people in charge of hiring) are white male Conservatives.

>>1392076
why do you lie like this?

>>1392089
will you ever stop being a faggot?

>>1392073
Most teachers are women. If you want to blame someone for that, blame the fact teaching was one of the few jobs most women could have pre-womens rights and now most manly testosterone filled conservatives see it as a women's job.

Your inability to change has taken away your ability to influence the future.

>>1392090
Why do you hate White men? And why do you lie about it?
>>1392092
>lol what, you think that public school systems are run by feminists or something? LOL where did you get that idea?
Is it just me or are the leftists on /news/ even more NPC than most leftists?

>>1392098
you're not white, you're a glorified gossip spreader so you're hardly a male, and you love lying

>>1392099
lmao, the NPC is having a full-blown meltdown now

yes the npc shill above me is. he seems to be projecting again

I wonder what his end goal is. It's like he's trying to elicit a violent response.

>>1392108
who knows, he could have a plan or he could be another rich famous faggot with some esoteric belief system who can't help but shoot himself and his entire country in the foot. kind of like hitler

>>1392067
>wealth seizure and redistribution
you can do this with a combination of broad access to high-quality education, and progressive taxation. however, it's necessary that your politicians don't get corrupted.

>>1392108
Same type of shit Trump does. Provoke and then act like a martyr. Over and over.

>>1392117
But anyway the point is to maintain "outsider cred." How do you do that when you've taken over the government? Get the msm to call you a nazi repeatedly.

>>1392123
The problem is, this doesn't work as well when you're the face of a company that needs to sell cars around the world to stay profitable. But hey, what could possibly go- oh international sales down 70%.

It's also important to remember Hanlon's Razor is very much a thing and Musk has proven himself to be very much retarded.

>>1392053
what difference does it make? its a pointless sentiment. its trying to draw a parallel between third reich public sector workers and all public sector workers, which is retarded

>>1392056
Because it was actually government employees who were doing the killing.
>inb4 the point goes over your head
Hitler, Mao, Stalin etc. weren't driving the tanks or throwing coal into the boilers of trains themselves. They were aided by the people who believed that they were 'just doing their job' in service to a greater cause.
The reason why Germany lives with the shame of WWII isn't because Hitler hypnotized the populace, it was because the populace willingly invested their political power into an authoritarian. They shared his failures as much as they shared his victories.
Musk is a retard though, so he doesn't understand that this also applies to the MAGA movement and Trump.

>>1392129
>Hanlon's Razor
Does it count as malice if he's geniunely convinced himself he's the based savior of humanity?

>>1392133
Well yeah. I'm questioning why he'd do this when he's literally running the government. Of course, he is retarded as you said, and MAGA are gullible, so I'm just gonna chalk it up to that.

>>1392138
He's high on ketamine a lot of the time.

Hitler was a bureaucrat. Hell, Elon is currently a bureaucrat.

>>1392058
>because government employees were the ones doing the murdering for Stalin and Hitler
The ones specifically doing the killing were mostly soldiers, secret police, brown shirts, etc. Bureaucrats, while directing the atrocities, weren't directly carrying them out generally.

It seems odd to shift blame off Hitler and onto bureaucrats when he was just as removed as your average bureaucrat but ALSO had ultimate authority over the killings. Presumably he's attempting to vilify having a strong functional government such as one that would be capable of carrying out atrocities, but this is a dumbass way to argue against that and could easily be misconstrued as conspiracism that Hitler wasn't personally involved in directing the killings.

Honestly Musk says and does shit that puts him in the position of either being the dumbest man alive or a neonazi so often, I'm beginning to think he might be the dumbest neonazi alive.

So why is the richest man in the world who could have just kept getting richer and also wants to I guess find a way to live forever and go to Mars trying to be Hitler

>>1392014
How is this piece of shit still alive?

>>1392229
Sadly money can buy you health and security. Fortunately it can also buy you tons of ketamine so with any luck he won't last as long as Ford did.

>>1392075
take your meds, schizo
>>1392076
>NOOOOO you can't acknowledge the objective fact that the government and universities heavily discriminate against Whites, males, and conservatives!
lol
>>1392092
>Most teachers/professors/government workers are woke feminist leftists because.... um.... because conservative men are bad and stuff!
lmao

If the government and universities weren't discriminating against White males and conservatives, then why did the White-male-hating leftists like (You) get so upset when Trump said he was going to end DEI in government and universities?

>>1392233
>If the government and universities weren't discriminating against White males and conservatives, then why did the White-male-hating leftists like (You) get so upset when Trump said he was going to end DEI in government and universities?
A question they can never answer

>>1392071
Mao did the same thing in China. And Democrats are definitely trying to do that, despite the gaslighting from anons ITT.

>>1392073
>>1392076
>>1392092
Until recently, Democrats in some states forced teachers and other government employees to give money to left-wing organizations. The conservative Supreme Court made this illegal in 2018 because it obviously violates the First Amendment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janus_v._AFSCME

and obviously there has been a lot of anti-White and anti-male discrimination in the government too. Teacher's unions even demand that White people be discriminated against even more:
https://nypost.com/2022/08/16/white-minnesota-teachers-would-be-laid-off-first-under-new-contract/
That same school district banned All Lives Matter signs while BLM signs are common in schools:
https://www.newsweek.com/minnesota-school-district-ban-all-lives-matter-signs-violates-first-amendment-lawsuit-1616299

Principal being caught admitting he won't hire conservatives:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/connecticut-assistant-principal-admits-discriminating-162259368.html

Universities teaching their deans to hate White people:
https://www.thecollegefix.com/universitys-anti-racism-workshop-teaches-deans-to-accept-white-inferiority/

And all of these:
https://i.imgur.com/qPq3v0L.jpeg

sorry anons, you can't gaslight us about this. Looks like this is yet another /news/ thread about wokeshit where the wokeists got BTFO

>>1392241
Jesus christ imagine being an indoctrinated partisan crusader like this poster

>>1392244
Jesus Christ imagine being proud of being objectively wrong like this poster

>>1392241
>Until recently, Democrats in some states forced teachers and other government employees to give money to left-wing organizations.
>Posts case about forced union dues
Ignored.

>>1392249
>Posts case about forced payments to left-wing organizations
yes?

Did you miss the other link about a teachers' union making it so the district discriminates against White teachers? Why should the government force White teachers to give money to leftwing organizations that will use that money to push for discrimination against White teachers?

>>1392249
>yes, they are being forced to pay dues to the teachers' union
>yes, the teachers' union is left-wing
>yes, the teachers' union is an organization
>but they are NOT being forced to pay dues to a left-wing organization because.... ummm.... I'm ignoring you!!!
lol

>>1392241
It's the usual bs you guys spew. For example, the reason why teachers gave to pay dues is because the unions are forced by law to represent all employees. If teachers don't have to pay dues, this creates a free rider problem where employees can get the benefits of the union without actually paying for the union. I.e. this creates a "free rider" problem.

Similarly, your "anti-White and anti-male discrimination" was a contract that would assure that if teachers were going to be cut for financial reasons, that they wouldn't cut the poc staff because they have a hard time retaining poc staff. The student body is majority poc, but the majority of the staff are white and they thought this would attract more poc candidates to the district.
Sex isn't mentioned and the race issue is pretty easily understood.
The other one was not a principle. It was a vice principle of a kindergarten in a small town Connecticut saying he wouldn't hire conservatives or catholics because of how they treat children.

The last one is a university in the uk. Not even the US and it was a card that one staff member wrote on themselves during racial sensitivity that said they would "accept white inferiority which is hard'
No reference of how the card was got, what they meant by that or why they said that but it was not part of the racial sensitivity training.

You guys are frauds who just want to stroke flames over shit no one cares about.

>>1392115
The only reason Hitler failed was because he wasn't powerful enough. He still managed to kick the world's ass. Unlike Hitler, Trump is powerful enough to take on the degenerate libtard "democracies" of the world and has nuclear weapons. Russia is a much better ally than Japan and Italy as well in this.

>>1392259
You can just choose to not work at a union workplace. This is like arguing Dems force employers to give money to left-wing organizations because slavery isn't legal.

If you're going to willingly receive the benefit of a service, you should have to pay for it. Simple as.

>>1392233
>NOOOOO you can't acknowledge the objective fact that the government and universities heavily discriminate against Whites, males, and conservatives!
67% Percentage of college presidents are men and 72% are white. I don't have data on their political leanings but statistically that distribution should be conservative leaning. Especially when age is factored in.

Clearly colleges discriminate against people of color, women, and progressives and you are delusional.

>>1392089
>why do you lie like this?
I'm not lying. You're just refusing to live in reality.

>>1392264
Hitler destroyed Europe, ended the age of European empires, and allowed the Americans and Russians to dominate the world.

>>1392265
How it started
>lol silly conservatives, the government isn't biased against conservatives
How it's going
>lol silly conservatives, you could just choose not to work for the government which is obviously biased against conservatives

My favorite part of these threads is when leftists have to drastically change their argument and hope we don't notice (but we always do)
>>1392260
>Democrats weren't forcing teachers to donate to leftwing organizations that openly hate White males
>Okay Democrats were doing exactly that but here's why it's a good thing!
lol

>your "anti-White discrimination" was a contract that would assure that if teachers were going to be cut for financial reasons, the district would explicitly discriminate against White people
lmao

>>1392266
>it's yet another "Rightists have actual facts and sources but leftists choose to just deny reality by pulling bullshit out of their asses without any source"
Yes I'm sure all of those universities that openly promote feminism, BLM, shit-talk White males, almost exclusively hire progressive professors, and were recently forced by the conservative SCOTUS to stop discriminating against White/Asian applicants are all secretely biased against women/non-Whites/progressives despite there being literally no evidence of this at all.

>>1392260
>The last one is a university in the uk. Not even the US
....anon, UK stands for University of Kentucky. Which is in Kentucky. Which is in the US.
The leftists on here are so ignorant it hurts.

>This person in a leadership position used a woke DEI racism workshop as an excuse to tell people that she hates herself for being White
>but this doesn't prove that people in leadership positions at universities hate White people

>>1392272
>Continues to insist the teacher's union is inherently left wing

>>1392275
>this organization which Democrats force people to give money too and which advocates for open borders, BLM, discrimination against White people, feminism, and endorses leftwing politicians is ACTUALLY secretly conservative!
>These universities which have feminist Women's Studies departments and anti-White anti-male Sociology departments and which openly discriminated against White students and constantly shill for feminism and BLM and other woke causes are actually secretly conservative and actually discriminate against Black women
this is actually mental illness at this point. Get help.

>>1392275
tbf you have to be a little left-leaning to be a teacher, reality has a leftist bias.

>>1392277
there's a lot to unpack here but I think you need to touch some fucking grass first and foremost anon.

>>1392014
>"Stalin, Mao, and Hitler didn't murder millions of people," the post, which he shared to his over 200 million followers, reads. "Their public sector workers did."
and bin laden didn't fly any of the planes. by this logic people who hire hitmen shouldn't be held accountable.

>>1392277
>give money too
sounds like you didn't listen to your teacher, esl poster

>most pro-Israel administration yet
>but the clown on the stage did a gesture so call them nazi
paper thin transparent manipulation, yet somehow it works.

>>1392308
Calling people Nazi is literally their go-to tactic

>>1392308
>>1392309
and ignoring blatant reality is yours

>>1392308
>guy does a nazi thing
>gets called a nazi
This shouldn’t confuse you this much.

>>1392315
What does the term Nazi even mean to you people if it doesn't involve antisemitism or jew hate?
Has the term just been redefined by democrats in the left to refer to anyone who supports Donald Trump, since Democrats and the left have taken up the mantle of jew hate, while trump and his supporters are decidedly pro jew?

>>1392318
people who do nazi salutes get called nazis. this is a very simple concept

>>1392318
>since Democrats and the left have taken up the mantle of jew hate, while trump and his supporters are decidedly pro jew?
There’s a lot to say about why nazis might support Israel, but if you’re saying nonsense like this, then I don’t think it’s worth it. Also >>1392319

>>1392318
>everyone to the left of Steve Bannon is a automatically a democrat
yawn

>>1392318
The fact that this post triggered the same person so much means it was a very accurate post

projecting shill is projecting again

I'm not triggered at all though

>>1392318
He literally wanted the Nazi party in Germany to win. He's a fucking Nazi.

>>1392349
There is no Nazi party in Germany

there are no esl shills posting on /news/

>>1392315
The flag salute was invented by James Upham and has nothing to do with Nazism

>>1392355
it's actually invented by romans. but mussolini is an infamous fascist because he was a neo-roman who destroyed his country

>>1392356
Mussolini didn't destroy his country, the Jew-backed (((Allied))) war machine did

>>1392357
you shill for republicans, that means you're a zionist if you forgot, shill

>>1392355
Uh huh.
I think my favorite one of these was that he was just “giving his heart out” to the crowd. Or maybe the stroke one? I should keep a list.

>>1392359
My Bellamy salute was just a shit post. I honestly think he was doing the "giving my heart to America/the crowd" but he looked pretty lit, probably ketamine, and I think it came across a lot different than he intended

>>1392365
and instead of apologizing and clarifying he decided to make a bunch of nazi puns after the ADL decided to give him benefit of the doubt.

>>1392365
I might have bought the "giving my heart to America" thing if he just did the two-handed gesture like a normal person, didn't explicitly do exactly that a while latter, and if he wasn't already doing nazi shit anyway.

>>1392366
Apologize to who? A bunch of blue retards who spend their spare time fucking kids when they're not cheating the stock market?

>>1392375
Apologize for doing a fucking nazi salute? You know that's a bad thing, right?

>>1392014
Elon is richer than you. He won. Get over it, or take a Risk and start your own Business and win harder than him. Face it. Elon is the best Humanity has to offer and we're all better off for it.

>>1392375
I don't think the right was mad about it, anon.

>>1392382
Do you get paid for this or are you doing it for free?

>>1392382
>or take a Risk and start your own Business and win harder than him
Ok, so first step is I need to retroactively make it so my family owned a apartheid emerald mine.

>>1392377
How is it a bad thing? Because a bunch of jews can't get over the fact that Hitler decided to invade Poland and stop the bolsheviks from systematically killing ethnic Germans, who then fled to America, hijacked the entertainment industry and teachers unions to propagandize American citizens forevermore?

Here's an idea: how about we stop listening to retards that call everything they dislike a nazi?

>>1392388
>Here's an idea: how about we stop listening to retards that call everything they dislike a nazi?
I genuinely don't get why nazis get mad at being called nazis. Have some fucking pride. You look like a fucking buffoon.

What even is the point in acting like a nazi and defending nazis and using nazi symbolism and believing nazi propaganda while treating being a nazi as if it's some bad thing? If you think it's bad, stop being a nazi. If you don't, own it.

>>1392356
>it's actually invented by romans
It actually wasn't. It was mythologized as being invented by the romans by the fascists.

>>1392388
>How is it a bad thing?
Ow, the edge.

>>1392014
But Musk did kill the dogs.
>According to an email obtained by Fox News reporter Jennifer Griffin, "ALL requests for everything," for the pups, including "vet visits, kenneling, dog food, etc" have been "put on hold until we receive guidance."

>The email was reportedly from the TSA's Security Operations National Explosives Detection Canine Program, which trains and deploys state and local law enforcement-led canine teams.

https://futurism.com/musk-tsa-dogs

>>1392395
Elon just becomes more and more based. Man does not let any sentimentality guide him, he's pure logic, which is what it's going to take to turn this country around. A man that doesn't let "niceness" or other weak feelings get in the way of what needs to be done. Getting more lib tears, that's just a bonus. What real man cares if some dogs die anyways? If they're useless, they shouldn't be fed with my tax dollars.

>>1392389
>I genuinely don't understand why calling someone a nazi, which we then use as an excuse to kill them, makes people upset

>>1392399
Nobody is killing nazis here. As far as I know, Fuentez, Spencer, and /pol/haus are still around. It's only when the nazis shoot up a school or invade neighboring countries that they start eating led. And if that's how you view the nazi smear, what does that say about people calling libs nazis?

>>1392400
>Fuentez, Spencer, and /pol/haus

Glowie plants

>>1392400
Setting aside the fact that you're literally too retarded to understand the difference between the alt-right and nazis, leftists have faked bomb threats to get those people killed.

Say what you want about racists or whatever, but they're not trying to lynch people. That's the domain of communists who think everybody to the right of Martha Stewart is hitler incarnate. Otherwise they wouldn't be torching cars.

>>1392402
>leftists have faked bomb threats to get those people killed.
this is why we need to build the camps. germany knew how to deal with these leftists nazis before they were cucked by the globalists after ww2.

>>1392404
So the based Nazis knew how to deal with the real Nazis (the left)? I'm confused. Is everyone a Nazi? I think that Nazis like Nazism, but don't like the vibes that that culture has towards Nazism. So it's a denotation vs connotation thing. That's why you'll have people saying Hitler was right, but accusing their enemies of being his followers.

>>1392404
>leftists nazis
lol
lmao

>>1392389
>>1392405
American education is shit, so most Americans associate nazis with the EVIL aesthetics (jackboots, angry German noises, goose-stepping, spiffy uniforms, etc.), not their ideals. Nazis are evil because they're evil, not because of what they did or believe. It's axiomatic in that sense. It's just another word for evil, rather than a specific philosophy and political outlook. Usually, when an actual nazi gets upset at getting called a nazi, it's because he understands you're calling him a douchebag. If he knew you were calling him a nazi because you understood he wanted a paternalistic revanchist ethnostate, he'd take it as a compliment.

>>1392408
>>1392389

https://youtu.be/zvgZtdmyKlI

Watch with CC on.

>>1392408
Or, you know...it could be both. You don't need an especially deep understanding of nazism to know it's shit.

>>1392410
National socialism is only a concern for marxists, because emotional manipulation has no solution to individuals who are willing to ignore intellectual arguments and simply use an axe to solve all their problems.

>>1392411
>emotional manipulation has no solution to individuals who are willing to ignore intellectual arguments
...uh huh.
>and simply use an axe to solve all their problems.
See? It's shit.

>>1392293
>by this logic people who hire hitmen shouldn't be held accountable
this is the power of leftist reading comprehension. Nobody said shit about accountability, just correctly pointing out that evil tyrants rely on a powerful government to oppress people.
>>1392278
>reality has a leftist bias
you realize the irony of saying that in a thread where leftists were completely BTFO and proven to not understand reality? On a board where leftists are regularly proven to be objectively wrong about reality?
>>1392280
I accept your concession.

>>1392278
Reality doesn't care about Democrat or Republican or any other political position you retard. Teachers unions do though, and so do other faculty

>>1392014
Communists have killed a lot more then Hitler. And Hitler was right, he was always right. Fuck T Rump and Musk and all politicians.

>>1392417
tell me how republicans misquoting statistics and misunderstanding the basics of economics is libs BTFO? Still waiting on verifiable facts and not just your trust me bro sources.

>>1392419
and here we are, back full circle to conservatives embracing Hitler. You always do this littlesong and dance trying to what if and same same your fascism with all other ways of life. But when push comes to shove you all admit you love Hitler and white supremacy and bigotry and sexism.

Conservatives are hatemongers doing their best to give excuses on why it is okay to be a hatemonger. Just lay down all the reasons and justifications for your hate so other idiots can pick them up and repeat them when they get called out for their hate.

>>1392402
alt right and Nazis are the same thing. Alt right just doesn't like being called Nazis. But they have the same values and social views.

>>1392405
you are exactly right. They have to call everyone else a nazi to muddy the water on what a nazi is. Because they are the ones with the nazi ideals and sentiments.They just dont like the association to their movement so they need to confuse the fact that they are the same. But they still come full circle to Hitler was right and did nothing wrong because at their base they are hatemongers and white supremacists who would love to ethnically cleanse the world.

>>1392418
I find is so funny how conservative freak out when you point out that the majority of humans do not agree with conservatism. That if the facts about your position are presented without your lies and misinformation, most people will not support conservatism ideals. Which is why conservatives have to lie and misinform to trick people onto their side. and why all studies show the majority of conservatives are factually inaccurate in their views.This is why reality has a leftist bias. No matter how deep in the Trump cult of personality you find yourself.

>>1392399
>I genuinely don't understand why calling someone a nazi, which we then use as an excuse to kill them, makes people upset
Bold of you to assume anyone willing to kill you for being a Nazi is going to care if you deny it.

Also, if you don't want to be killed for being a Nazi, it seems to me the solution is to not be a Nazi.

>Usually, when an actual nazi gets upset at getting called a nazi, it's because he understands you're calling him a douchebag. If he knew you were calling him a nazi because you understood he wanted a paternalistic revanchist ethnostate, he'd take it as a compliment.
Except we're dealing with people openly embracing Nazism as an identity except when directly addressed. That position only makes sense if the person in question actually doesn't know what a Nazi is. If a douchebag wanted to be a douchebag they wouldn't get upset at getting called a douchebag. Or if they would, it would be out of shame.

That's ultimately my point. These fucking Nazis have no fucking pride and/or they're complete fucking morons.

Maybe you could argue that they know they're Nazis, but they're banking on other people having literally no fucking idea what a Nazi is, but in that case, they're just a different flavor of moron.

>>1392390
upon further review, it was mythologized as being invented by the romans by a french painter who rode revolutionary coattails until napoleon lost and then exiled himself until his death

>>1392272
>lol silly conservatives, you could just choose not to work for the government which is obviously biased against conservatives
Being forced to pay union dues isn't a bias against conservatives any more than being forced to pay for groceries is, dipshit.

>it's yet another "Rightists have actual facts and sources but leftists choose to just deny reality by pulling bullshit out of their asses without any source"
>https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/09/college-presidents-leaving-jobs-sooner
>67%
>Percentage of college presidents who are men, and 72% who are White, with an average age of 60. That’s much less diverse than the overall student body, which is 53% White and 58% female.
Some people don't need to lie to argue their points. You should try it.

>Yes I'm sure all of those universities that openly promote feminism
...you don't actually know what feminism, means, do you?

>>1392439
>the government forcing government employees to give money to left-wing organizations is not a bias against conservatives
at this point you're just arguing in bad faith.
>muh percentages
literally ZERO evidence of any discrimination against women or non-Whites, while there is a lot of evidence of discrimination against White males. These are facts. That's why conservatives sued colleges to enforce the Equal Protection Clause, and why leftists seethed and cried when the conservative SCOTUS told colleges to stop discriminating.
>what feminism means
it means hating men.
>but they told me feminism is about equality and I just believe it like a good little NPC because I'm not smart enough to do any independent research
kek

>>1392446
no one cares lying faggot. stop making threads

>>1392420
>alt right and Nazis are the same thing. Alt right just doesn't like being called Nazis. But they have the same values and social views.
Alt right stands for alternative right, and was a breakaway movement that arose from a desire to get away from establishment republican politics. It's comprised of disaffected libertarians, conservatives, republicans and white nationalists who don't toe the line on Israel.
National socialists aren't right-wing. They're third position hyper-nationalists who hate intellectualism and have an abstract view on socialism.
Leftists confuse these groups because they're retarded.
Neocons/RINOs conflate these groups because they want everybody that's against Israel's influence in American politics to be gatekept.

>>1392448
>white nationalists who don't toe the line on Israel
lmao. you mean evangelical schizophrenics who literally want to bring about the apocalypse by supporting israel

>>1392449
No those are neocons. Batshit insane in so many ways.

>>1392439
the government literally refused to hire anybody unless those people agreed to give money to leftist organizations that endorse Democrats. How is that not a bias against conservatives?
>Percentage of college presidents who are men, and 72% who are White
LMAO it's been like 50 years since your bullshit wage gap myth was debunked and you're STILL promoting the mythical idea that anything less than 50/50 gender representation is somehow automatic proof of discrimination against women. There are very few actual studies on this (because leftists monopolized the research and they know that the evidence is against them). That's why we rely on individual cases, of which there are plenty of examples of universities showing a bias against whites and men while you haven't provided any examples of the opposite. So instead you rely on a gross misinterpretation of statistics.
One study I do know of is from Sweden, but there's no reason to think US academia is much different:
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1318306
>Yet today only 27% of faculty with the rank of professor in Sweden are female. A common explanation is that academia is biased against women.
>Men had significantly more publications and citations in both medicine and in the social sciences, rejecting the hypothesis that women are held to a higher scholarly standard in this context.
Even though 73% of professors are male (higher than the US figure you cited), the men were actually significantly more qualified. Indicating that it's men, not women, being discriminated against. Sweden discriminates against men and men still make up 73% of professors, so why would you assume 67% in the US means discrimination against women?

>feminism
Again? We've had like 100 threads on this on /news/. Every time, we cite hundreds of examples proving feminism is against equality and you never give even one example of prominent feminists who support equality.

>>1392467
>we cite hundreds of examples proving feminism is against equality and you never give even one example of prominent feminists who support equality.
You can't cite an example of feminism being against equality when it definitionally advocates for equality. If you find someone who calls themself a feminist, but is not for equality, they are simply not a feminist. Much the same way a liar that calls themself honest is not honest. A classic example would be TERFs.

>https://www.britannica.com/topic/feminism
>feminism, the belief in social, economic, and political equality of the sexes.

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism
>Feminism is a range of socio-political movements and ideologies that aim to define and establish the political, economic, personal, and social equality of the sexes.

>https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/feminism
>belief in and advocacy of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes expressed especially through organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests

>https://www.dictionary.com/browse/feminism
>the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men.

>https://www.oed.com/dictionary/feminism_n?tab=meaning_and_use#4611048
>Advocacy of equality of the sexes and the establishment of the political, social, and economic rights of the female sex; the movement associated with this (see note below).

>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/feminism
>an organized effort to give women the same economic, social, and political rights as men

In summary, you don't know what feminism means.

>>1392350
Fuck you, you gaslighting fuck. They go by a different name but they're Nazis. We're not pulling this crap.

>>1392365
Bro. How? How do you think this person has it in him to "give his heart" for America? He literally has a villain's origin.

>>1392402
>Say what you want about racists or whatever, but they're not trying to lynch people.
Is it even worth having a conversation with idiots like these?

>>1392510
Yeah it's a good thing we're still stuck in antebellum era otherwise you might look like a retard.

>>1392365
Elon has done the "giving my heart to the crowd" shtick before. On camera. He does it by making a heart over his heart with both hands and then pushing that out to the crowd.

Not doing the full Hitler.

>>1392540
>Yeah it's a good thing we're still stuck in antebellum era otherwise you might look like a retard.
>lynchings only happened in the antebellum era
Woo nelly.

Also literally just fucking yesterday the president tossed a bunch of hispanics into a gulag without a trial. Literally the only reason they weren't executed is your side isn't there "yet", not that most of you don't fucking want to be. Fucking spare me.

>>1392540
There is some genuine gaslighting in the idea that racists aren't killing because they don't go and get a rope and find the nearest tree. You're an idiot through and through. Its a good thing all the influence is through Trump and he's old. This won't be an era that lasts long the moment the snake's head dies.

>>1392564
> This won't be an era that lasts long the moment the snake's head dies.
Trump is the sum of our collective political will made manifest in a single person.
He was chosen as president because at least half of the American electorate decided that mass deportation, isolationism, and far-right politics was preferable to the alternative.
Trump isn't our caesar. He is our Gracchi. Succeed or fail, he will hail the rise of a new American empire, because that is what we want.

>>1392559
>the president tossed a bunch of hispanics into a gulag without a trial.
Murderers, rapists and other violent criminals who have been residing here illegally. Individuals who willingly gave up their rights by infringing on the rights of others, who were repeatedly released into the interior under Democrat watch, and who believed they were entitled to our land.
We know who said what. We know who aided these people to come into our country, who willingly aided the victimization of women and children. Don't think for a single moment that we don't.

>>1392597
MAGA is a cult of personality. As soon as Trump dies the spell is broken. There is nobody charismatic enough to continue the grift after he’s gone.

>>1392613
You really don't know who the Gracchi were, huh.

>>1392014
in a slightly literal sense he's right, but i dont see how that would make it better. besides its actually hitler AND bureaucrats killed 6mil.

>>1392308
>pro-israel
>nazi
yes.

>>1392498
>it definitionally advocates for equality
that's not how movements work. If I find that everybody who calls themselves a feminist is against equality, and everybody who supports gender equality is anti-feminist, then that means feminism is against equality. Which is why you can't give any examples of prominent feminists who support equality.
>MUH DICTIONARY!
lol you're an actual teenager? Grow up. Did you actually think you were proving something by giving an NPC answer of "But look, other people told me feminists support equality!" while never giving any examples of feminists who do in fact support equality?

in summary, you need to grow up and start thinking for yourself instead of being an NPC.

>>1392620
>how that would make it better
he wasn't claiming it made anything better. That was just the narrative that leftists and illiterates like >>1392293 invented so they could have an excuse to pretend he's bad.

His actual point was that tyrants need a large powerful government in order to carry out their oppression, and that public sector workers are not inherently saintlike (which many leftists have been implying lately) and are often more than happy to commit evil acts on behalf of tyrants.

>>1392673
>that's not how movements work
It is though?

>If I find that everybody who calls themselves a feminist is against equality, and everybody who supports gender equality is anti-feminist, then that means feminism is against equality
Sounds like the problem is you. As a pro equality feminist, I don't have that issue. And I've never even heard of anyone else having that issue.

>Did you actually think you were proving something by giving an NPC answer of "But look, other people told me feminists support equality!" while never giving any examples of feminists who do in fact support equality?
I am a feminist that supports equality. Again, this sounds like a you problem. You seem to surround yourself with delusional people and liars.

Why would someone that supports equality call themself an anti-feminist given the definition of feminism, for example? Anyone that does that is a fuckwit.

>>1392674
>His actual point was that tyrants need a large powerful government in order to carry out their oppression
They don't, actually. There are plenty of examples through history of tyrants oppressing people and carrying out atrocities through pure military force. Literally all you need is a group of armed fighters willing to go town to town slaughtering people. Or even better, organized public violence like the Rwandan genocide where ethnic violence is enabled and encouraged by the government. That was the result of a power vacuum being taken advantage of by a paramilitary organization that used the government as a puppet to mobilize much of the population into helping them commit mass violence.

Another counterexample would be the Confederate States of America which was a military dictatorship built around the institution of slavery, but which had a comparatively small and highly disorganized bureaucracy by modern standards.

Martial power is what is needed for oppression. As long as that power is supplied either through government supply or looting, oppression can be perpetuated. Bureaucracy can help organize and supply that force, but only that. And even then it doesn't take a massive bureaucracy to do so.

You want less risk of oppression, defund the fucking police and the military. Oh wait, Elon's a fucking defense contractor that decried calls to defund the police. Fuck him and fuck you too.

>>1392695
>Martial power is what is needed for oppression
No it isn't. You could just as easily threaten to ruin someone's life instead of outright shooting them.
Starving on the street because you're unemployable has the same effect as a public execution, except the former is more politically acceptable among leftwingers. And that's what happened for decades among right-wingers.
>nooo you called me a faggot, that means you deserve to starve
Sorry, you can't be allowed back into politics. You're too dangerous.

>>1392686
Can you name any feminist organizations which support gender equality? Can you even name any feminist organizations period? No offense but you don't sound like somebody who has researched feminism much.

>Why would someone that supports equality call themself an anti-feminist
because feminists call people who support gender equality anti-feminist. If you ever had a discussion about feminism that went deeper than "but feminists tell me they support equality!" you would know that.
But you've never talked to feminists about equal custody rights or female privilege or women forcing gender roles on men or domestic violence or rape statistics or false accusations or sexist divorce courts or International Men's Day or HeForShe or Women's Studies or the White House Council for Men and Boys or any number of other topics where feminists say that suporting equality is anti-feminist.
The Men's Rights Movement itself was started by feminists who supported gender equality. Then other feminists told them it was misogynistic to support gender equality and kicked them out of the movement. MRAs didn't originally call themselves anti-feminist, it was feminists who decided that supporting gender equality is anti-feminist. Christina Hoff Sommers is one of the extremely rare feminists who supports equality, and every other feminist calls her anti-feminist.

You should watch The Red Pill, a documentary by Cassie Jaye. She was a feminist who thought that feminism was about gender equality and wanted to make a documentary saying MRAs are misogynists. Then she actually researched feminism and interviewed feminist leaders, and by the end she stopped calling herself a feminist. Because literally nobody who knows shit about feminism thinks feminism is about equality.
Here it is:
https://pluto.tv/us/on-demand/movies/591c73777497089a40ff0142
Watch that and ask yourself why feminists hated it and protested it.

>>1392597
>Succeed or fail, he will hail the rise of a new American empire
On what? He let the toothpaste out by breaking essential government agencies. Him challenging the justices and essentially proving the courts have no power potentially ignites the fall of the empire. You can't have law without consequences and in order for law to exist, you have to believe in it and only Trump can do this shit apparently.

I genuinely doubt Vance could get away with what Trump is doing.

>>1392686
>>1392883
The "true feminist" post by Karen Straughen is relevant here:
https://i.imgur.com/31z5Ayk.png

>>1392417
>you realize the irony of saying that in a thread where leftists were completely BTFO and proven to not understand reality? On a board where leftists are regularly proven to be objectively wrong about reality?
you are projecting. faggot.

>>1393252
>claim that public universities and schools are biased against Black women and leftists
>get BTFO
>claim that teachers' unions are not left-wing organizations
>get BTFO
>claim that feminism is about equality
>get BTFO

this thread is just a constant stream of leftists arguing against reality and proceeding to get BTFO. Notice how (like every other thread on sexism/racism) we provide specific examples and sources and you (like every other thread on sexism/racism) have nothing?
Reality has an anti-feminist, anti-woke bias. And it gets proven on /news/ all the time

>>1393341
>And it gets proven on /news/ all the time
and that's the only place where your retarded faggotry is "proven"

>>1393682
Actually it gets proven everywhere that feminists don't shut down debates.

>>1392439
>ALL WHITE MEN THINK THE SAME REEEEEEEE
>ALL WHITE MEN IN COLLEGIATE ADMINISTRATION ARE CONSERVATIVES REEEEEE
>NO NO NO COLLEGES DONT PUSH WOKE AGENDAS THATS ALL IN YOUR HEAD REEEEEE

>>1394711
This but unironically.