On track of course
>>27631671220 km/h in a van. That 1.6L engine did a good job keeping that van at that speed despite 800kg of cargo and occupants. It didn't do it quickly but patience is rewarded. It will get there eventually.It made me a fan of small turbo engines. They may not have the longevity of a gigantic engine that idles its whole life, but it sure can perform when it can.
>>27631671About 6 seconds inside your mom
112MPH in a '92 integra, that's about as fast as it would go. Went over over a drainage ditch bridge and got enough air to leave scrapes. Didn't go that fast again in it.
about this. closed road in Mexico btw
>>27631671I once got a fully-loaded US Army M1075 with trailer up to about 60 off-road in Afghanistan. I thought that was the day I was going to die.
>>27631760Fastest I've ever gotten a civvie vehicle to is around 115 mph. Don't know what that is in metric.
>>2763176096 kph>>27631765185 kph
176 mph (283 kph)Used STi, less than $1k in mods
>>27631710>220Maybe downhill.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=go1tEOrfIPAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=go1tEOrfIPAThat's not the top spec 1.6, but 20 more HP is not going to be good for 42 more KPH.I've done 158MPH in the Grand Prix. The Coupe hits redline at 152 and gets there pretty quick.
109 because that's when the governor kicked in and wouldn't let me go faster. 95 bonneville
195 in a rental 3 series on the autobahn, had a sticker saying do not exceed 200 and I was worried it had a GPS in it
128 mph in an E46 wagon. I've got a Corvette now and I'm too worried about crashing it to go fast. I've slowed down in life.
132 in my first car, i need to get new tires and an hptuners to hit 145 to 149mph in my current car, ecu locked to ~128 with the overtall tires it currently has
290kph/180mph indicated in an old celica. It was still climbing but I got worried about the mid-range 15" rubber and backed off. I cruised at about 250kph/155mph for a couple of hours and the diff has been noisy ever since.
>>27631769I don't speak I've never landed a man on the moon
>>27631902ST205? That looks to be the only one with enough HP to come close.I'd say your speedo is 10% optimistic. 162 is in line with what the interwebz says.There's a huge difference between 160 and 180. 160 can be hit with mid 200HP depending on the size/aero of the car. (Celica is smol so I can see 240HP breaking 160). But 180 usually needs well over 300HP.
>>27632009nah engine swapped ma61.
>>27632016Top model for that is only 178HP.Your speedo may have been off by more like 15%.
>>27632043anon have you been drinking?
>>27632009At normal car sizes weight between 2400 and 3500 pounds has nearly no effect on attainable speed. Its a handful of horsepower difference which translates to 1 or 2mph at high speeds.160mph isnt realistic from 250hp without a cD 0.3 or lower, and that's 250 at the wheels not engine rating.>>27632044In his defense nobody thinks of early 80s supras when someone says celica.
>>27631869>Maybe downhill.It required patience, that's for sure. I wish to see the day when tiny engines turn into high output timebombs that make lol, lmao even of high displacement engines.
210km/h in a civic si, it's how I found out the driverside door didn't seal properly.
>>27632044Not him but yes
>>27632072Frontal area matters. A Celica is only 69 inches wide.I have no doubt that my Z3 Coupe could hit 160 with only 228HP if it had a little taller gearing. It has no problem at all redlining in 5th at a bit over 150.328i's will hit 150 with 190HP.
>>27632121>frontal areaOh right. My car is "only" 3 inches wider and taller than an e36 but i would need to max tune the stock engine for 310hp and do some aero reduction to get close to 160.Reported stats for an e36 give 21.1sqft cd of .32 and a weight with driver of 3400lbs which comes out to 170HP to reach 150mph, which is unlikely because drivetrain losses are always more than 10% (190 x 0.9 = 171).So no a >stock< e36 328 cant hit 150, my calcs give 147 as a best case possible which agrees with the official specs.>z3 coupeLet me do that one too:22.2sqft 0.37cd, 3150lbs, take 15% drivetrain losses,I get 195 wheel hp needed for 148mph which agrees with stock dyno results and 15% drivetrain losses. So no your z3 coupe 3.0 isnt brealing 150, stock 228hp.
>>276321395th in a Z3 is 1:1
152mph in a caprice ppv. Only started hearing wind noise past 120. Every other car I drove made it past 85
>>27632200m8 the math and public dynos of a stock z3 show it cant reach 150 without being on a long downhill with wind at its back.
>>27631671125mph in a Chevy Malibu rental car.110mph in my 07 corolla.
>>27631671I got a Smart car up to 150km/h before. That was a bit exciting. It didn’t seem too upset about it though.
Managed to touch 130mph, book speed is 124mph. Long stretch on the downhill, the thing was screaming but at the time I didn't care, felt like a bat out of hell.
>>27631671>202 mph on a hopped up 2000 R1>155 mph in my foxbody>191 mph in a G2 ViperI am sped
>>27631671142 MPH in an 04 lincoln LS. I bought a 96 e420 in hopes of topping it since they are 150+ capable, but I didnt know the us cars are limited at 130.
140mph in a '66 mustang with a bunch of mods, owned by the stepdad of a girl I was shagging. I wasn't driving though, he was.
>>27632957If were gonna include being a passenger, Ive been 180 in a highly modified b5s4, on the run from the federales on the way to the casino
140 in my s4, 186 on an s1000rr, 135 in my gti before speed limiter was removed.
Think about 260km in a 5 series maybe 20km outside of the Frankfurt airport.
136 in a 1st gen brz, basically floored it for a mile long straight. Got spooky when the rear tried lifting off
>>27631671today i broke my record. over a 100 in a fabia mk2. I had my license for over 2 years and never went over 100 before. [spoiler]all km/h[/spoiler]
119 mph (gps) on a cbr600, indicated 125. lost my nerve and backed off
160 + mph or so a few times. When people are reversing towards you at 100mph, don't look down.
probably 140 sum in my old volvo.
>>27631671about 110 in my rickety datsun that I drove while in college. there was a section of freeway that sloped down for a good quarter mile, always used it to build up speed and fly past all the merging downtown traffic.on my bike (picrel) I got up to about 115 on a country backroad and got scared so I backed it off. it had plenty more though, I was only in like 4th gear iirc. that bike is fucking scary and I love it so much.
speedo needle was at 120-125 on 81 South, downhill in the mountains around Roanoke. 2019 Jeep Renegade. Did slightly worse in a rental Ridgeline before that at about 115-120 in the same stretch. Appalachia mountain driving is fun.
>>27633827looking a bit crusty
315km/h in my fathers Porsche Turbo after I promised not to go faster than 160km/h on the Autobahn In my corvette shitbox I am scared to drive faster than 200km/h even though it would nearly go 300km/h
>>27631671140mph in an MX5 with a wonky alignment.pretty scary honestly.
Limiter on a GSF250 so 180ishLimiter on a TL1000s so about 290ish230 and climbing in a Stagea RSFour160 stock MX5 the rear lift is extremely bad180 cut on ZXR250
>>27631930Kubrick directed the "Moon landing" in Hollywood
158 mph in a 92 sc400Took a friend to check out a mint z32 Lumina with the doch v6. As soon as the kid started it the engine started knocking. Did a 360 and walked away. About 5 mins later he came flying past going maybe 100mph. Deciding not to be stood up I floored it and by the time I caught up and passed him the speedo was right at the 160mph mark. I slow down and he tries to fly by again and blew the engine right after he went by .Here's the best part the car wasn't his it was a friends he was helping sale. I found that out when he called me saying I owned him for the show ,I laughed and hang up the fun.I miss that lexus ,the ride was incredible. felt like doing normal highway speeds the whole time
270ish in muh bone stock gen 5 cumaro. Would like to try and crack 300 now with a few mods and proper tires, iirc the Ontario """street record"" is 331 in a benzo
indicated 140-something in a modded 944 turbo
120ish in my 2006 Honda Odyssey170+ in my 2010 C6, past 140 it felt like I was almost floating but still planted. Even crazier is it was still pulling when I started slowing down.
>>27637971Indicating the unit would help, Bozo.
155-160mph indicated in a 2008 XJR, though it's supposed to be electronically limited to 155mph, but it was indicating slightly beyond that.
>>27638023Him mentioning Ontario would indicate that he is a >leaf and thus uses silly ninny metric units.
50mph in a golf cart that was limited to 18mph down a hill, the brakes did not stop it in time with 4 people in it, plowed through a chain link fence.scariest moment of my life, there was a cliff after that fence.pic related.
>>27634979>160 stock MX5 the rear lift is extremely badHow old was that MX-5?Basically any modern MX-5 can hit ~130-140mph (~210-225kph)
>>27631671I once hit 130 on a 1995 Yamaha Seca II that had no business going that fast.Then the rear end started to shimmy. I eased slowly off the throttle and (thankfully) it settled down.Honestly I don't know how I made it out of that without wrecking.I was 19 and dumb.
120ish in my 81 monte carlo according to the dude racing beside me; my speedo only went to 85. 119 according to gps google in my 90 geo prizm 5-spd
>>27638033I've seen some people say the later XJRs from that gen didn't have limiters, at least not in the US. Though they wouldn't go much beyond ~160-175 anyway.
>>27631671topped out my 530i at about 250kmh
>>27631671I've had my 80s truck up to 175, but she ain't stock. The big truck did 145, with 10k in tow at the lake bed. Fastest I've ever been was 280 in someone else's land speed car.
>>27631671134mph before the radiator blew up. Luckily, it was at night, on a state-maintained, 4 lane, straight track.
>>27638052When I had a stock '95 mx-5 with over a quarter million miles even it went to 125-128 mph and could stay there. I don't remember any lift issues, it was really comfortable and not sketchy at 125.
>>27631671Past the speedometer, maybe 130mph in a four cylinder. You stop feeling planted on the ground past 110 and it gets incredibly sketch.
>>27638770Yeah I think he's LARPing.
My E63 will eventually be able to reach 200mph, but I've only briefly done about 124mph in it. Was just to test 100-200kmh. But on the autobahn several years ago, I had my old saab 9-5 a bit over 150mph. It had more to give, but I bitched out because of massive rain puddles. Probably around 280hp in that thing.
>>27631731I got up to 190 on the new transmission gully before I felt like my engine was gonna explode. What kind of car do you drive?
>>27642290A31 Ceffy
>>27642290Nice try rozza. not telling you about the 750
128MPH on a KTM 790 ADV S with metal saddlebags and fuckhuge windscreen. Pretty sure a tune would take her up to 140 but I sure as fuck wouldn't
4 wheels, 151 in a rental CTSV2 wheels, 125ishon track, i dont know cause speedometers LOLI mean no, all of these were on track
>>27642956How do you go slower on two wheels than four...?
