>>27636036
Im sorry man i didnt know you and Rachel had a thing going, if I did then I wouldn't have hooked up with her

Side vents and red seatbelts on executives bother me more then it should.

I've been thinking about trading in my mustang for a G80. Getting kinda tired of the mustang being so noisy and low and coupey. And if you want a V8 car then there's not a lot of options left. Charger maybe, GSF is way overpriced. Other than that you need to start going like 10+ years old.

gookshit

>>27636643
BMW, Mercedes and Audi all make options.

>>27636694
Except none of them have had na v8s in over a decade.

>>27636655
not an argument

>>27636036
nice way to scream "I couldn't afford a Lexus"

>>27636739
Oh, the goalposts are clearer now thank you for clarifying. The transmission programming is more important anyway, and they excel at that better than American and Jap marques, for at least the last 3 decades.

>>27636739
The S65 is a goated engine. Minus the rod bearings.
Love mine, sounds and feels so fucking good to drive

>>27636759
>muh goalposts
Is it really asking too much that, when given the set (Dodge Charger, Ford Mustang, Lexus GS F, Genesis G80 5.0), one could easily see the pattern in their engine options?
I mean is reading comprehension and basic critical thinking such a low priority in schools these days that you have to preface every thought you have with a foreword containing any and all possibly relevant information?

>>27636778
>I couldn't be bithered to include the two letters "NA" in my original text
>here's a whole diatribe about why that's your fault!
That collection of cars could very well have been mistaken for "slow, shitty and pigfat V8s" just as easily btw. Yes, a clarification would have helped you.

>>27636643
>>27636778
The pic is of a G70, which has no V8 option at all

>>27636791
I didn't because I didn't think I needed to. I also didn't explicitly specify that they were rwd sedans. But you managed to figure that out on your own now didn't you

>>27636036
Still a Kia.