>frontF90 best (most cohesive bumper, basically upgraded F10, nice headlights)F10 close second (best kidney grilles, traditional halos, awkward 'cheekbones')G90 distant third (looks retarded)>rearF10 best (best proportions, nice taillights)F90 close second (nice but kinda blobby taillights, weird lower area, trunk slope too steep)G90 distant third (taillights are ok, bumper is horrible, too blocky, ugly jowels, steeper trunk slope, decent spoiler)>engineF90 best (F10 motor with several technical updates to fix any issues)F10 second (first hot-V V8 so a few issues but still fast and awesome)G90 distant third (detuned F90 motor with gay hybrid system you'll never charge)>performanceF90 best (objectively peak BMW performance, fastest and lightest of the three)F10 second (a bit slower than F90 plus no AWD or ZF8)G90 third (slower than F90, much slower with uncharged battery, 1100+ lbs heavier than both)i won't compare the interiors until i sit in a G90 but a few points from the press release:- the removal of the shifter means it is likely garbage and i will probably hate it.- i've sat in a few other latest gen BMWs with the wraparound cluster and i very much dislike it as well. feels like a kia - they have the same thing as well as ford and many others.- the steering wheel in the G90 looks like a slight upgrade over the F90.- the ridiculous interior colors are not befitting of a 5 series, those should have stayed with the M2/3/4.a few notes about options:- carbon ceramics shouldn't still be optional on a 5400lb car.- bowers and wilkins being standard is nice, it was a must have option imo.- carbon roof was standard on the F90, from what it sounds like it will be a $$$ upgrade on the G90, again horrible considering the weight gain.from what i've seen so far the only redeeming part of the G90 is the new trunklid M5 badge. that looks pretty sweet and i will probably replace mine with one.
new M5 badge for reference.
>>27771322>new M5 badge for reference.I'm going to buy this and put it on my e39 auto wagon
>>27771330Based.
>>27771319F90 is the best and it's not even close. However the F10 is based for having a manual option even if it was only for North America.
>>27771319I prefer the e60 m5 and it's na 5l v10 over those borg cube turbo v8's.
>>27771319>the one I can afford is the best one hurrdurrrThis board is such a joke. For years everyone called the f90 pigfat and a gay vacuum but now that they’re cheap and beat to shit you love them. Lol
>>27771363It's == it isV8 is what?
>>27771319What the fuck are awkward cheek bones? F10 looks way better than the f90 from every angle.
>>27771319>carbon ceramics shouldn't still be optional on a 5400lb car.this is the only thing I truly take issue with in your post. F10 ass is worse imo than g90, but steels are entirely appropriate for non-track use and there are very good reasons to not want carbon brakes on a sedan
>>27771465it looks like a surprised chipmunk with cheeks full of nuts.
>>27771468F90 already needs aggressive pads that make it sound like a school bus coming to a stop and they still fade after a few highway pulls. idk how the G90 is going to fare on steels with an extra 1100lbs behind it.
>>27771470
>>27771474>brakes fl"fade after a few highway pulls"Why are you on the brakes during highway pulls? Post your cars you larplet slowfaglet
>>27771480either slowing down for traffic or waze/radar hits.
>>27771483That isn't a pull
>>27771484ok.
>>27771485Ok so why are you on the brakes during a pull? Post your cars you larplet slowfaglet
>>27771490i'm not.
>>27771494Why are the brakes fading after a few pulls then?
>>27771505i'm applying the brakes between pulls. why are you having such a hard time with this.
>>27771508Lol why
>>27771511>>27771483
>>27771513That's not a pull.
>>27771515>>27771485
Kek fucking retard doesn't even know what a pull is and is trying to say the f90 brakes fade after a few of these said pulls. Larplet slowfaglets are hilariously retarded
>the f90 brakes fade after accelerating!!Literally can't make this shit up
you realize that in order to do MULTIPLE pulls you have to slow down in between, right?
>>27771527just leave him alone, anon. he's had a tough day.
You realize that you don't have to fucking slam on the brakes so much that they fade after a few applications to slow down, right?
tldrarguing about shit you cant affordpost car bennchie
>>27772710Which one?
>>27771319F90 > F10 >>>>> G90I don't know what the fuck BMW is doing anymore with all the new cars. I'll keep my M550 for a while, save my sheckles, and look for an F90 when I hit 100k miles on the G30.
The new one looks like a chinese clown car what the fuck
The g30 lci and g20 are the only good looking modern BMWs
>>27772941That doesn't look good at all though
>>27771319>no side rankingThe F90 clears the others in this category, with the G90 being a distant third.The brilliance of the G30/F90 lies in BMW's "hidden" signature design feature. Everybody knows about the kidney grille, the twin headlights and the Hoffmeister kink. What people don't usually notice is the shoulder line.But they should, because the shoulder line in the G30/F90 is genius. Usually you only have one, but in the G30, BMW decided to have two for extra muscle. The first runs through the side of the vehicle as usual, connecting with the door handles and the tail lights and running parallel to the window. Classy BMW design, I'd expect nothing less.But the second? Above the first, it diverges from it, running toward the window and around the Hoffmeister Kink, highlighting it even further. The line then converges with the window afterwards. That's right, motherfucker. The XM and the G82 M4 got zero kinks, the G30 has one with EXTRA BASS.But besides mogging the other M models by having this feature standard on the regular G30, the F90 builds upon it with that great side grill, tying the lines together and giving it an origin. You can even see a third line coming from that piece if you look at the way the light hits the driver door.As far as modern cars go, the F90 is peak timeless design and will age extremely well. Schizo G90 could never compare.
>>27773033this vent, fake
>>27773052ricelet
>>27773033which looks great on the Z4 aswell. too bad that initial ground reflection doesn't get picked up by a line in the rooker panel. Regardless I raise you the angle magic headlights on the g90. theyre not boomerangs like say on the first gen CLS that get steeper over the fenders but they level off more horizontally from the sideview, look like a straight line from front 3 quarter and like boomerangs from the front. see if I can find a pic showing the illusion.
OP is a faggot
>>27773269>but they level off more horizontally from the sideviewI had not noticed this before, very interesting.The headlight design is a very interesting conversation to have, BMWs usually have a downward line at the edge, which gives the car a more sober look. The illusion you mention makes it appear like the G90 doesn't feature it (like the E60 also didn't) until you look at it from the front.
>>27771461nobody cares.
>>27773318e60s are ugly
>>27773052no it isnt.
>>27771338Time out. You euros didn't even get the manual? Not even in the 30 jahre edition?
>>27773052It's real on the M550, there's no reason it'd be randomly fake on the M5..
>>27771404Don't tell me the M5 that weighs more than a fucking Tahoe and is slower than the outgoing model is worthy of praise
Instead of arguing about what happens when a car accelerates, let’s talk about the n62 engine. Is it a steaming pile of shit that can never be completely fixed or is there hope? Those cars are cheap and fun when they work, normie haven’t caught on yet.>t. wrenchlet looking to buy used 650i
