So are automatics now more efficient than manuals?
>>27774527automatics are now (always have) gayer than manuals
>>27774527Yes, and they have been for quite some time
>>27774530Automatics are so much more comfortable to drive
>>27774527Until they shit the bed and need thousands of repairs. Will the slight mpg be worth it?
>>27774527Have been for a while. New fangled 10 speeds are pretty good about fast shifts and keeping maximum torque bands for mpgs
>>27774544If they are more efficient than manual, the gearbox should last longer, not less.
>>27774527depends on whos driving as always. for nu-males and npcs theres no chance they get good MPG with a manual since they cant drive but a good driver can always beat an auto.
>>27774551 I guess automatics are more fool proof than manuals though.
>>27774564Lots of people ram and fuck their gear boxes in manuals with aggressive gear changing.
>>27774575This is why a lot of semis are autos now. True you might get more miles out of a decently driven manual gearbox but Rasheed doesn’t know how to do that and will gut one in half the time. Better to just slap one in on a pretty well timed milage rather than guessing when it will blow.
>>27774527I didn't read anything in OPs post just wanted to comment on the OP image. I hope that's a heavy duty truck because that's about 3,000 lbs minimum in the bed (about 1500 lbs of water plus 1500 lbs of people). Boomers are retarded as usual.
>>27774527No. They never were or will be. Are you retarded?
>>27774530are you a boomer or something?
do AT now last longer than manuals?are they easier to maintain than MT?whats the replacement price of a modern automatic vs a modern MT?jw
>>27774527>nowShit is it still 2008?
>>27774527>nowwelcome to the year, I don't know, like 2012? 2008?
