theres no dual cab kei trucks because of the obvious size restrictions for kei class but i feel if that had the same bed length as the suzuki carry it could actually be alright. no the deckvan doesnt count as a dual cab.

i wonder what a fully loaded one of these with 350kg of shit in the bed and 4 guys with gear would do to the transmission and engine

>>27843336
already too expensive as is

File: 003-2 (1).jpg (53 KB, 1024x768)

53 KB JPG

>>27843732
>theres no dual cab kei trucks because of the obvious size restrictions for kei class but i feel if that had the same bed length as the suzuki carry it could actually be alright. no the deckvan doesnt count as a dual cab.

The international Jimny is not a Kei car. So your whole rant doesn't make sense.

>i wonder what a fully loaded one of these with 350kg of shit in the bed and 4 guys with gear would do to the transmission and engine

Probably not much. The main engine and transmission architecture is shared with the non Kei carry.

Smallest double cab truck I know of is this. It's only a out 8" shorter than a Hilux 8" thinner as well