>1.5L wankel left>1.5L wankel rightif you set them to opposite rotations you get perfect engine balance. Gentlemen, the next generation of power.
>>27984248uh huh ok so now how do you transmit the torque from both cranks going in opposite directions without canceling each other out?
dorito is old and bustedwe want rotary vanes and quasiturbines
>>27984248And they'll always stay perfectly in phase with the power of magic, I take it?
>>27984308Two sets of these. Connect the crown gears with a shaft.
>>27984429derp I forgot Differentials are like that exact thing but backwards.
>>27984248Use a coaxial counter-rotating axle. Super common in the aviation industry.That way you can significantly reduce the total volume.
>>27984374>connect them with gears to a shared output shaftthey have no choice but to stay in sync
>>27984374What if you were to instead use a series hybrid powertrain with no physical linkages, each engine turning a flywheel that drives a generator and exploit the ability to intentionally take them out of phase?That would enable using them to change the cornering behavior of the car.
>>27984248Aren't they already balanced since it just spins with a uniform shape?
>>27984308>>27984374deez niggas don't know bout magneto timers.
>>27984308Is this really the best rebuttle you could come up with against this engine design? A problem that can be fixed with simple gearing??I pray you can learn to be happier in life and appreciate more things.
>>27984248Imagine the packaging nightmare
>>27988796You just need to go W I D E
>>27984308Go away. You don't belong here.
>multiple crankshafts
Rotary is already well balanced Why introduce a headfuck of gears before the transmission that will be a guaranteed failure point
>>27984248Looks like that would really wankel my crankel!
