I don't know or care about car performance and don't even want to bother researching about them. I just like the way they look
>>28111041>I just like the way they lookwhy did you post this retarded pod then?
>>28111041I feel you. If I were rich, I wouldn't collect supercars or other such high performance bullshit, I would collect cars that I think look cool or have interesting design and/or engineering.If you think about it, performance cars are easy to build. You need a powerful engine (or electric motor), stiff suspension, lots of tire and brakes, and try not to make it too heavy. None of that is difficult to do, which is why people can build them in fucking sheds.A car that's beautiful or stylish or otherwise interesting to look at, on the other hand-- that's art, not engineering, and producing art is not so simple.
>>28111433tsmt but mostly for 70s and 80s cars
>>28111041what car?
>>28112049yoyo
>>28111041Experience will readily correct that point of view, especially when getting around a world alpha city by Uber. In general, high-performing cars look good, especially on longer looks.
>>28111041We just had our first squirrely weather of the year and I can tell you that you would probably be dead in a ditch in that.I'm all up for fun cars but that would be a nope right now.
>>28112116It's made for getting around tight city streets and it's perfectly adequate for that.
>>28112154Yeah but no but our tight city streets yesterday would see rats gnawing on your bones today.Neat little car. Deathtrap this week.
