Satan is tempting me with an old new car. for the price it actually seems decent to get into a no mile v8
>>28196020I thought the furd veeate cost more than this?>>28196023thats me but i dont even have the car
no deals on chebby
>>28196020
>>28196020Are any of these cars "fun?"
>>28196020Where's the old car
>>281967522023 isnt exactly [current year]
>>28196032>2020>2021
>>28196020How is every American not driving a Challenger/Charger?
>>28196831I mean I guess for these shitboxes 2 years is already ages.
>>28196850They sold a fuckload of them
>>28196850imagine showing off your car and half the country has the exact same car. like congrats bro, you have half-decent credit, big flex
>>28196850Because we like trucks. We like them because they have purpose like loading firewood, tools, or parts or anything else that takes up space to carry OTHER than people in the wasted area taking up the rear half of a car.Car to truck conversions are common. If a Challenger/Charger looked like this, I might actually own one.
>>28197039I want a f150 because I'm so tall. I really could care less that it has utility
>>28197035I too remember 2005-2008 lolFor those that weren't around, the 2005 Mustang was the car that kicked off the retro styling trend. Chevrolet brought back the camaro, and Dodge brpught back the Challenger in the wake of Ford selling millions on millions of these cars. They were everywhere to the point of comedy.
>>28197120>the 2005 Mustang was the car that kicked off the retro styling trend.no
>>28197130>>the 2001 PT Loser was the car that kicked off the retro styling trend.no
>>28197195problem, offizier?
>>28197196>>28197120>the 2005 Mustang was the car that kicked off the retro styling trendWrong Mustang Buckaroo. >>28197130>>28197195>>28197196Lol, lmao even.
>45k msrplucky sobs. these things go for 75k in yurop, new
>>28197035Who cares, if it's a good car it's a good car.What is that obsession with uniqueness, I get it if you're a millionaire, otherwise I get what is best for the money.
>>28196032>five years on the lot>no price dropZero miles or not that's a used car.
>hundreds withering away, getting sun scorched on a lot into irrelevancebut these are supposed to be really good cars?
I'd rather have a car that didn't weight 4,000+ lbs
>>28197221>otherwise I get what is best for the moneyOk, post your civic
>>28197239nobody is buying v8 anymore, its elon time
>>28197294There's no V8 civic, why would I buy one.
>>28197321Because you're not a millionaire and get what's best for the money
>>28197333>best>no v8
>>28197333Best for the money means you set some criteria and get something that fits them for the least possible amount of money.Which for me were V8, >450hp, some amount of comfort.
>>28197333Kek
>>28197035Surprisingly, not so. I'm continually amazed at how many people give various signs of actual appreciation and positive comments when I'm out in the Challenger and the things have been out more than a decade. I feel the real reason that these Dodges aren't selling to everybody is that most people want pickups or CUV's with AWD (for safety!) instead of a RWD coupe.
r/t looking good I feel like manuals will 99% chance be msrp while autos are marked down
>>28197111>>28197039>>28196850ThisDespite how pigfat those cars look anyone not a woman cant fit in em. Further pre-coof and now again a truck was just a way better deal.
>>28196020If nothing else, buy an RT and stuff it into a garage for 30 years. Once millennials get into retirement age, they'll dump their children's inheritance for that final taste of nostalgia and you'll get some extra retirement money.
>>28199164>Extra Retirement Money>Car sells for what it did brand new when you could've been enjoying it
