[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/o/ - Auto

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


>car features in each section
>biggest breakthrus
>biggest mems
go
>>
>>28196537
middle would be probably be usually high end meme cars, but lets focus more on extremes. obviously rolls royce is diminishing returns the car, but there is return still. what about no return but loss.
>>
>>28196537
90s emissions equipment would've been in the green. then after 2000 or so it started going yellow before quickly going into the negative returns
>>
>>28196537
>>
>>28196810
dont think backup cam is exactly negative, id put it on productive.
>muhh cant drive for shit
>>
File: file.png (78 KB, 800x533)
78 KB
78 KB PNG
don't really need anything else really
>>
>>28196878
i put it straddliing negative and diminishing returns. If it's a small car or it has good visibility then it's a negative. If it's a bloated cuckwagon, then yes, it's nice, but still only in diminishing returns.
>>
>>28196878
1. It wasn't put as a negative
2. They're only necessary because modern vehicles typically have terrible visibility
3. People that think they're great just look at them, and not their surroundings, and totally miss any pedestrians who are walking from the side etc.
>>
>>28196921
yeah my bad lol, i even realized without u even telling me kek but reply was already there
>>28196921
yep yep
>>
>>28196928
>>28196948
id still say even with god visibility, they would be handy no? unless u have driven that car for long while and its basically ur sense how its dimensioned
>>
touchscreens are ultimate negative. but damn they are productive for manufacturers kek, and just put egg in it brainwashed normies eat it up like hotcackes cuz muhh high tech
>>
>>28196953
it is obviously ,,higher techh'' but its far from more convinient let alone luxurious
>>
>>28196810
fuel injection and electric windows are definitely productive
traction control, backup camera and daytime running lights are diminishing returns, you don't need them but you can't say no to them (if tc is togglable of course)
>>
I would say electronic interior components fit. Like the layer above me said, electric window controls are great in that they're easier to deal with while driving than a crank and provide access to control the windows you can't physically reach. Setting a temperature rather than using a dial for climate controls might be a moderate improvement. By the time you get to electronic seat adjustments, though, you're in the negative. It's slow and annoying compared to just pulling a lever.
>>
>>28196810
Nothing wrong with throttle by wire. Lets you modify it for your own preferences and vehicle or you can keep it 1:1 like a cable throttle
>>
>>28196537
>productive
Miata
>diminishing returns
Corvette
>negative returns
Any of the 5,000lb BMW M cars
>>
>>28196810
>fuel injection is an upgrade over carburators
>traction control is necessary to avoid tards killing themselves
>anything-by wire is better than current systems
>>
>>28196951
i feel like they just become a crutch for poor vehicle design and laws
>cant see out the back or sides? lol who cares just use the backup camera
>>28199567
>>traction control is necessary to avoid tards killing themselves
why are we trying to save tards from themselves again?
>>
>>28199677
>why are we trying to save tards from themselves again?
from everyone else on the road. Have you not seen the thousands of webms of abdullah-al-lavali slamming his bimmer off the line at an intersection, spining out and barging into the traffic in opposing lane?
>>
>>28196928
>totally miss any pedestrians who are walking from the side
I dunno which back up camera you're using, but most have a pretty wide angle
>>
>>28196878
Diminishing because people think they can just blast behind you now because the camera will see you and the sensors on the bumper will beep for you. Every single gadget including TC and ABS are detrimental to the driving experience and if driving is too hard for you with out it then you don't deserve to drive.
>>
>>28200274
Then those people should be taking the bus. Why cuck cars just to allow Stacy to survive texting while driving?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.