>lol that hybrid twink magnet is for faggots and can't offroa... AACK
>>28198065The Badlands version of this and the Bronco Sport are very capable for softroaders.
>>28198065imagine spending over 40k for the most loaded maverick when you could have gotten an actual 4x4 of literally any one of the midsizes plus a marginally better truck
grown ass men will pay money for this
romflamahahaahaha look at how these ricers cope
every single one
>>28198075Okay but what if I didn't want a 4x4 "midsized" truck that's as big as an f250 from the 90s?
softroading
>>28198078You underestimate that engine.The Ecoboost came from this:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazda_L_enginehttps://fordmasterx.com/understanding-the-lifespan-of-a-2-3-ecoboost-engine/Now if you were talking about the 2.7 or 1.0 or any other belt driven oil pump engine, I'd rag on it of course.
>>28198065I want one of these because it'll make anti truckolds mad and regular truckolds mad
>>28198110dude no self respecting man would pay for this piece of shit
>>28198072You can't get a Badlands Maverick Hybrid though.
>>28198065me mums camry could drive over that pathetic field m8
>>28198129This is absolutely true. I don’t know what it is about the Maverick, but its mere existence makes causes a lot of malding. Maybe it’s because it’s the truck 80% of truck owners should earn, and they fucking know it.
>>28198132Sure they would. Total sales of the Ford Bronco from Q1 2020 to Q4 2024 is just shy of 460K units (vehicles).Even if less than half of those came with the 2.3 the chances that a "self respecting man" didn't buy one with incredibly unlikely.https://carfigures.com/us-market-brand/ford/bronco
>>28198083Based. More room for my girl to lean over and blow me while driving.
>>28198161There's a picture of a Maverick in OP why the fuck are you talking about the Bronco
>>28198161trust me, not a single self respecting man bought that shit. Fucking ricer.
>>28198202>Even if less than half of those came with the 2.3 the chances that a "self respecting man" didn't buy one with incredibly unlikely.Deflect all you want.
>>28198065Holy fuck these things are pathetic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deoHzP6pihU
>>28198206
>>28198065It’s 3 wheeling in that pic because it has no flex kek
>>28198065You can decently offroad almost any vehicle youre okay with beating the shit out of.
>>28198065I never said it couldn’t offroad, I said that it was gay as fuck.
A FEW MOMENTS LATER
>>28198132YEEEE HAW VEE ATE OR BUST---#NOREPLACEMENTFORDISPLACEMENT#COMMIEGOHOMESent from my iPhone 8
>>28198209>a truck made for the city doesn’t do well off-roadNo shit?
>>28198335Cope.
>>28198620Every truck smaller than a one ton is made for the city as well these days. Every one of those do very well off road.
>>28199626
>>28199646Okay? Even that cherrypicked example is going to do much better off road than the Escape tranny.
>>28199650Probably not depending on the terrain. Short wheelbase is superior in most cases like that, but it's weird to even compare the f250 to a mav when they are completely different classes of trucks..
>>28198080>$180 for some bent steel with some letters cut out of itholy shit i need to get myself a plasma table thats like free money
>>28198078Quite literally the most hideous engine bay ever produced
>>28198080>clean the engine bay upYou're rolling some carpet over the murder bloodstains, honey
>>28199650>everything smaller than a one ton is for the city>cherry picked exampleOk faggot.
>>28198129Dude I promise you, no owner of an actual 4x4 is "mad" about you driving a cucktruck. We just feel bad for you that's all. Sorry to be the one to tell you.
>>28199834Nobody goes for a crew cab long bed... 98% of the modern 3/4 ton and larger trucks are crew cabs with a 6' box which aren't obnoxiously long like a 8' bed truck is. Even though a comparable spec 3/4 ton is more than 4' longer than a Maverick it will still be infinitely better off road.
>>28198339This but unironically
>>28198065It’s funny how much goal post moving goes on. Remember when 0-60 was the metric for how good a sports car was? Suddenly everyone changed their tune when EV’s showed up. People have been clamoring for a return of compact trucks used specifically for light duty tasks, and now they’re judged by their off-road capability. I really like the Maverick because it causes instant seething. That one Anon always pops in with the same pictures of a Maverick buried in mud. It’s pathological.
>AWD unibodyNot a truck
>>28199308I see no evidence here that it isn’t gay as fuck.
>>28199898I guess we're back to feelings mattering more than facts?
>>28199856>there’s a ton of goalpost moving>>28199898>it has a bed and is classified as a truck by the NHTSA but it doesn’t fit my newly formed definition of what a truck it because… it just doesn’t, ok!?Pottery. None of you faggots would have said pick rel wasn’t a truck before the Maverick was released.
>>28199898based
>>28200422Samefagging this hard
>>28198078>no bullshit honest engine bay>bullet proof drive train Make Element shaped and I'll take it.
>>28198132>t.
>>28200478where did you get this picture of my father and his buddies?
>>28200297That's a ute.
a trucks job is to haul materials from one place to the other. taking engine blocks to the scrapyard. firewood. pallets. hay. etc. it doesnt need 4x4. or even a trailer hitch. that's what the bed is for. dont have enough room? get a longer bed
>>28200538I the versatility of a trailer. Beds have their place tho
