what does /out/ think of this list? are these good locations for /out/ing?https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/slideshow/best-of-the-world-2025
>>2785763are these NATGEO approved locations any good?what are your thoughts
>>/trv/
>>2785766shithole board
>Boise Idaho???
>>2785763>Enter your email to read this articlefuck off
>>2785917the absolute state of phonefagsits funny because you can easily bypass this if you have any sense whatsoeveralas, the phonefag slogs in his dimwittery
>>2785919are you schizophrenic or just shilling?i'm not using a phone you dumb nigger, and i'm not going to use your retarded gay siteseeing as it already has LA on a list to visit, its a paid for advertisement, no, of course its not fucking good for outing, its an adhave any more retarded question &/or assumptions?
>>2785923I didn't realize umatrix auto blocked the popup, pretty epiceither way you can still bypass it, one of the easiest being typing in literally any random email and getting immediate access
>>2785763Top 25 places to AVOID. Same as the Top 5 National Parks or 'Popular trails in your area'.
>>2785763Brasov again... blehI was only once in that city, and never felt the need to go away. My grandma brother was the head of riot police in the city... and while we passed by the buildings destroied by bullets, he said something in a depressing manner i don't remember. But i think he had something to do with the fights the people had with army during the revolution.
>>2786654Again. Don't go to Brasov. Don't fall for Dracula novel... The human blood is still fresh on the streets of that dammed city. They shoot 200 humans and no one was arested and the colnel who was the head of the batalion is keept secret by army. It might be my grandmas brother... those killers and their childrenn still live in shadows of that city.
>>2785763I actually had to stop scrolling because I was laughing so hard at this. Is this how far Nat Geo has fallen? Has Nat Geo turned into Vice? >>2785917I put someone else's email in :^)
>>2785764You picked the most boring 3 off that list.I've been to several of the places mentioned, seems like they picked them all out of a hat or more likely are being paid to shill by local tourism boards. It's only been a few years since NatGeo went for-profit and look how far they've slid.