im curious what /out/'s stance on delta smelt and trying to maintain biodiversity in californias water ways?seems like the argument is that the smelt is not worth the hinderance to growing food or the inconvenience of rationing water in an urban setting. ya/na?and isnt the argicultural issue that they would no longer be able to flood fields for cheap food and have to use drip irrigation which would be more labor intensive? (meaningful jobs growing more food)
>>2799697I think we need to step back from consuming the ecosystem. Sure, it's sad what happened to people's homes in California but they shouldn't have been there in the first place:>Overpopulating an area with very limited water supply>Building on hillsides covered in chaparral that has natural wildfiresSo my take is remove the city, not the wildlife. Shouldn't be a controversial stance for /out/
If Gavin Newsom and the politicians that run California prefer to protect the Delta Smelt at the expense of the regular California resident it really does not impact me. If the residents of California tolerate it why should it bother me ? Are they helpless ? Do they need flyover rednecks to come save them ? Californians need to unfuck themselves and their politicians. No we will not be Climate Change Sensitive in redneckistan because you say you suffer the impact. Unfuck yourselves.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB85RY2Xk_U
bump
