How important is it to study photography through the library? What books do you recommend for beginners? What are the best photo books?
>>4466583Kek, I have been here since 2015. Here's your (You).
>>4466590>I have been here since 2015fuck off newfag
>>4466597The one I am talking to was probably born in 2008.
>>4465924yeah im not taking advice from a board full of people that cant write something to save their livesat least people here can take decent photossometimes great photos too
>>4466739Most of the people that use that board dont even speak english as their first language.
What is HDR in files? Can I export any RAWs as HDR in RawTherapee? Or do I need a special camera that captures extra data in the RAW? Do you use this?
>>4466284it is possible 12 or 14 or 16 bit raw data snapshoting at base sensitivity 24/7 and normalize jpg
>>4466503No display technology can go brighter than the brightest it can go. No "knobs go to 11" tomfoolery will change that.What they do is they dim the backlight everywhere else so that bright area looks brighter by comparison. Which could be fine in theory but it looks like shit in practice. Because your "4k" tv is limited to like 0.1 megapixels of high contrast so any detail in high contrast areas gets all muddy.
>>4466625But that’s exactly what hdr screen technology is (and therefore what the files do). The knob goes to 11/10. But not for the whole screen simultaneously, only parts
>me, creating HDR raws out of three raws with different exposure
>>4466694And only apple products support it properlyAnd no one fucking cares because a proper 16 bit raw to 8 bit srgb jpeg conversion produces a good looking image just like 14+ stop DR film always produces good 8 stop DR prints
#1post ur clouds edition
>>4466452vengeful ghosts of dead irish
video but it's clouds and still cool to do
Shot this a while ago as a camera test of my new phoneIdk why but most of my shots turn out pretty dark
Sea of clouds
Where do (you) host your /p/ortfolio?
>>4464021Based. Same here.>>4464023Also based. What ken lacks in CSS, he makes up in saturation.
I made A static html website..> https://tifelabs.com/Photography/ I put low resolution of the picture thumbnail to make it load faster, so when you click,the low resolution get replace by the high resolution..
>>4463791a pdf on google docs
>>4466606Is there a generator for that? Can you share the code? I'd love to set up something like that, but I just haven't got the nerve to deal with computers anymore. Learning by looking things up on the web has become unsufferable...
>>4466606Your like XP shot is good if only for a few minor changes that would be submit to windows 12 territory.
Thread theme: https://youtu.be/QR75ti4mN_A?si=N-UtB79FhGkJOuBO
>>4466255You're not just a miserable liar, but a mental midget
I am saddened by what this thread has becum.
>>4465968Why an NC Miata, anon? Not insulting you, just curious.
I am so looking forward to getting this back soon, it's in the shop right now.
Old one reached image limit. >>4429946
>>4465916Pentax K200 with 55-300 f4-5.8 lensIt's not the best for bird pics, 10mp feels like too little, like 99% of the pics I take are absolute shit
brrrrrraaaaaaaap
>>4465680
solitary! sandpiper! real flighty. did not walk close.
The perfect lens DOES exist editionPrevious: >>4463859
>>4466592>cotton carrier skout>average /p/ gearfagAhahhahahaha
>>4466580What about the kodax Pixpro? It has 16MP compared to my iPhones 12
>>4466575A 24-120 f4 is the same price as four copies of 50mm f1.8.So just get both.
>>4466543Buy used, idiot.Get yourself a D600 for 200 bucks, then spend the remainder on a lens.
>>4466601looking good
lemme see your shots for the moon!this is mine btw captured with canon 2000d 55mm i can not remember my camera settingsi gave it some edit with lightroom this is first time with DSLR
>>4461290kek, yeah /p/ee is back
Oh god look at it!It is so REDHOW DID IT GET SO MAGNIFICENTLY CRINSOM!Moon coom!
>>4466426>his moon is monochromaticbaka desu senpai
>>4466476>not having a mono chromatic moon
New thread[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height667
>>4448957he claimed it's AI, the burden of proof is on him
novice question here. looking to do wide-field astro but I have the worlds shittiest $20 tripod (quantaray qsx2001). should i just wait and invest in a better tripod or can i get away with using a shit tripod if i weigh it down or smth?using a canon ti5 and samyang 16mm f/2, no star tracker because i'm broke.
>>4465780t5i*
>>4434712Best one in this otherwise sterile overly processed STEM brained garbage thread. I really like this anon. Very celestial and mysterious. Nicely composed. It is the juxtaposition of blue, mountains and woods makes it so fucking kino. This is art.
Hello. I figured this was the best place to ask. I'm thinking of getting my first telescope. A SkyWatcher 300P. Will I regret it?
Shameless edition.Last thread: >>4457780
>>4466140Music is also not merit based. All of pop stars are industry plants. That doesn't mean shit. Art music still exists. Then there are clever pop stars like Charli XCX who find ways to penetrate into mainstream. If you do good work and you know your audience then you will gather attention. An artist has to be sharp minded. Knowing how to market yourself is a key skill of being an artist. This lone wolf starving hermit artist is literal fiction. Nobody is coming to publish you. At. first you gotta make moves, network and market yourself.>>4466141>bandcampThere is no such site for photobooks. Distribution of music is totally different from photography. Still new hotshot bands like Black Midi were signed with labels.
>>4466141That's like having an Instagram, not printing a photobook
>>4466144On bandcamp at least you can present your music in a dignified manner where you get your own page for an album and you can stylize the presentation of page and present everything in a structured manner.
>>4466107How are you? How has your mental health been?
The majority of people who get published because they are good started out as self published artists.Going to a publisher first and succeeding is a strong nepotism/cocksucking/sellout/politically favorable trash indicator.
Any love for the Game Boy Camera and printer here?Sure nowadays even the chinkest of cameras and printers may be better with printing via phone bigger and clearer photos but there's a certain charm and fun in doing with with a Game Boy of all things.
Mine had photos from the previous owner, seems like a cool guy. I hope he's doing fine.
Game Boy Color :tm:
>>4463010amazing
>>4462992I have like 10 packs of GB Printer paper unopened. I got them from TRU on clearance for like .25 each.The funny part is that I didn’t get a Printer until like 10 years later.
>>4466372There's a pretty high chance the chemicals in those roll is faded by now, I'd suggest getting new rolls.I've seen people recommend this one if you live in the States.
>some of the greatest photographs of human history were, on a technical level, blurry, grainy pieces of shitTell me again why you need edge-to-edge sharpness, 100 megapixels, and the ability to shoot at 124,000ISO?
>>4464716I like to imagine the secret king that thinks he's doing something by using a bot. Post photos, talk about photos posted and ignore the obvious botting. It's really the only way.
>look at shitty photo why you need camera?>look at shitty painting why you need camera?>look at shitty mural why you need camera?>unga bunga look stick draw stand
>>4464533>some of the best photographs in history were on filmwow it's almost like film existed before digital
>>4464533>Tell me again why you need edge-to-edge sharpness, 100 megapixels, and the ability to shoot at 124,000ISO?Because i need a crop of a corner at night like your pic related
>>4464679It’s the deep state trying to prevent you from enjoying your photography hobby anon
no coloreds allowed
>>4466337really muddy film
rollei infrared, rz67
more IR, mamiya 6
these were a couple years old before i developed them. forgot how i exposed so i used stand development
I enjoy the process of photographing quite a bit, I enjoy editing, I enjoy every stage of the photographic process. However, at the end of it all, I am left with a bunch of nice, edited photos, and they just sit unseen on my hard drive forever. What are other anons doing with their photos after they have something they are satisfied with?
>>4466322>lly dont make things social just to make things social. Male photography is about taking ownershipThis is all so hilarious because I DO like to take pics to share on social media, I am also a married millenial male with a child, and I can bench 2x my bodyweight, whereas you are a coping basedlet faggot telling me who the real man is. OK buckster, go get em
>>4466353That homo sounds like a lesbian to meIt IS manly to do shit for yourself, but men can still decide to share. It's just most white women are raised being drip fed narcissism so they can't even imagine doing shit for themselves without involving at least 3 other people (but they prefer 300+).
>>4466242What? White men colonized the whole world.
>>4466354>>It IS manly to do shit for yourself,WEAKI VVILL SPREAD TERROR IN HEARTS OF MY ENEMIES WITH THE GREATNESS OF MY PHOTOGRAPHSI VVILL MAKE THEM SUBMITI VVILL FUCK THEIR BITCHI VVILL GET PUBLISHEDI VVILL CONQUER THE ART WORLD
>>4466272based
>don't switch to a new mount in the digital transition so all your customers can still use their old film lenses>pride yourself for upholding true photographic tradition and having the finest lenses with the most "character">release the first full frame camera that can actually make full use of all those "sweet" 35mm pentax lenses in 2016, literally 10 years after the competition>in the meantime only make shitty APS-C kit zooms>Release your only monochrome camera for the true affecionados>It's APS-CWhy is this company such a joke?
>>4466350You mean Nikon before they went full videofag?
>>4466341There's literally a button that says "MODE" on the d850 kek
>>4466355We need a camera with a MOOD button I think.
>>4466355Yeah I kept hitting it and twisting the lower ring on the same dial expecting it to be like a PASM dial, instead turns out you have to press it and the rear right scroll wheel next to the AF button. It was kinda annoying. Too many fucking buttons. The D780 I picked up was a lot more intuitive/easier to use. Pic related to see what I mean. I was pressing hold and twisting the ring on the same dial expecting that to change modesAF also wasn't working when I half pressed the shutter only if I pressed the AF button but that could've been some retard reprogramming it while it was on display.
>>4466371you should be using bbf anyways
