>$15 for 26exp ultramax>$17 for Colorplus>$18 for Gold 200yep, im thinking its over
I just paid 30 euro for a 3-pack of goldhttps://www.macodirect.de/en/film/color-negative-films/6316/kodak-gold-200-35mm-36-exposures-pack-of-three?number=KG2011P
>>4297128Start bulk loading vision3 film. Ecn-2 dev and remjet removal is nothing to be afraid of.Think it's like 350 bucks for 70-80 36 exposure rolls.
>>4297128Just scam Amazon
>>4297128The fuck are you talking about?
I'm considering giving $600 to the jews for a 400 foot reel of Ektachrome
>>4297143Dooooo it! Make sure to use old film for the leader and a couple inches at the spool to save on good film!
>>4297128I just got a 3 pack fuji 200 for 25 bucks on amazon
It's over if you're poor, I guess. I'm still shooting medium and large format slide at around $5-10 per exposure.
>>4297128are filmchads unironically richer than digi leica virgins?
>>4297149yes but you dont have sex
>>4297151Correct. Don't even care, at this point.
>>4297149Based. If you want cheap b&w 4x5 you can buy spooled agfa aviphot and cut your sheets with a simple jig. You can get down to less than 50 cents per sheet that way.
>>4297149Here in Eurostan, Fomapan 4x5 is about 1€ and 8x10 3€. Granted, Kodak is 5x more.>>4297153I've trimmed litho film to 4x5 and it was pain even with safelight. (About 1 to 3 ISO, dev rodinal 1:200 or so for very thin negatives with some tones.and "character".)Too bad I have not done any film myself since start of covid era.
>only shoot film when I travel>Bought 5 rolls of Ektachrome last time I traveled in 2019 for $65>Traveling again this summer>5 rolls of Ektachrome cost $130Wtf happened?
>>4297128>Fujikodak Gold 200 still >$25 for a 3-pack of 36expLife goes on.
>>4297218>I fucked up the alligator eating the bigger numberSomeone please just sumerily execute me.
>>4297219I knew what you meant, I never would have noticed unless you pointed it out.
Will shit get cheaper or is this "le new normal"?
>>4297209There's no more fujichrome and $ are inflated
>>4297246Wtf really? Damn I also wanted to get some proviaIt's so fucking over :(
If there is in fact another recession coming, it is over for film :(
>>4297128Third world?All 36 exp:>Arista edu (fomapan) 100: $5.89>Adox scala 50: $7.49>Adox CMS 20: $7.99 >Fuji 200: $7.99>Fuji 400: $8.39>Wolfen 100 (svemacolor): $849>Ultramax 400: $8.98>Rollei copex rapid microfilm: $8.99>Tri-X 400: $8.99>Gold 200: $9.99>Ektar 100: $13.49>Cinestill: $13.99-16.49>Portra 800: $17.95>Proimage 100 5 pack: $39.95 ( $7.99)>Portra 160 5 pack: $69.95 ($13.99)>Portra 400 5 pack: $74.95 ($14.99)>-wanker line)>E100: $21.99>Good luck getting any other slide film, just edit your scans to look slidey lolFilm is fucking cheap unless you insist on shooting everything on professional stock, which is kind of like the film version of buying a sony A7RV for travel snapshits.
>>4297209>>4297270Slide film is dead because the only bulk customers justifying modern film tech are shooting color negatives. Also, fuji discontinued fucking everything to sell garbage xtranny cameras and instax. I have no idea why any of it is even still available in 35mm. It barely adds any value to most peoples lives unless you're at least shooting 6x7.On the other hand my lab sells respooled bulk kodak vision for like $10 for a 42 exposure roll, supposedly because they bought a respooling machine that makes it piss easy for them
>>4297231there's no reason to bring it down when kodak has a near monopoly in the market. >what about ilford/harman???haha
>>4297290these people are still buying film at walmart instead of b&h because they're antisemites
>>4297290>>Wolfen 100 (svemacolor): $849Where, all I see are bw orwo?
>>4297306>still buying film at walmart instead of b&h because they're antisemitesavoid this common mistake, no really how can anyone hate the jews when they have deals like this
>>4297309oops yeah that's wolfen black and white not the svemacolorsvemacolor is $12.80https://www.freestylephoto.com/2435500-Wolfen-NC500-400-ISO-35mm-x-36exp.Color-Negative-Film-Color-Film
>>4297312Thanks! Well, not that it's most economical color film, but still lower than prices OP brings up.
>>4297311I just wish they sold it in 70mm. :[
bros.....
>>4297128GET A JOB
>>4297423what is this sp400x and premium 40? charge is over lucky 10 000, should be a fun shooting day ahead
>>4297312>https://www.freestylephoto.com/2435500-Wolfen-NC500-400-ISO-35mm-x-36exp.Color-Negative-Film-Color-FilmThis shit is NOT Svemacolor, this shit is made by InnovisCoat. Even in its last dying breath(~1995) Svema made color film much, much better than anything current ORWO can dream about.
>>4297295>fuji discontinued fucking everythingthey didn't though8d0sm
>>4297295>the only bulk customers justifying modern film tech are shooting color negativesEuphoria alone had more pull to start production of slide film than all photographers together.
>>4297587>start productionyou know that the only difference between e100 and 5294 is perforation, right?
>>4297601No I thought it was different
>>4297219>sumerily
>>4297571Both Superia versionsX-tra and Premium
ITT: poorfagsFilm isn't that expensive. If you can afford good film gear, you can afford the film to shoot in it. Niggas in here with Leica M bodies and Hasselblads bitching about the price of film, shut the fuck up.If a fat lolcow truck driver can afford film you can do it too. Are you seriously more broke than Sugar?
>>4297978>buy a sportscar>bitch about maintenance costsYea, seems about right
>>4297978>Film isn't that expensive.If it isn't that expensive, how come it has all but been wiped off by digital?>inb4 you say it's because of the jews
>>4297984most "professionals" snapshit out of control (they're below minimum wage newspaper interns)do you really think the people that somehow think 40fps e-shutter is a good thing would ever pay for film
everyone who really cares is shooting cine film anyway
>>4297991>le newspaperso you're saying it's le jews, fuck off
>>4297777
>>4297999rent free
>>4297128What's the deal with 120?Has it gotten any more expensive?
>>4297128Gold used to be $5 and ColorPlus 200 was $3, UltraMax was about the same. I don't see any reason to shoot ColorPlus anymore, I liked it for snapshitting when it were cheap, now it's so expensive I might as well pay a tiny bit more for the nicer Gold, or even Portra/Ektar.
>>4297130You would have saved some money if you bought it at your local dm
>>4297290>Adox CMS 20: $7.99The fuck?CMS-20 was 12€ last time I checked, even HR-50 is 6,50€ now
>>4299768Many US online stores have it listed for 7.99 but suspiciously have no stock
>>4299860It is in stock at the german store Fotoimpex, however to be fair:German stores list prices including tax (19%) while US stores usualy list prices excluding tax.But then again, HR-50 has a very high resolution already and a more usefull sensitivity.CMS 20 needs a push development to even do 20 ISO, so you're shooting 12-16 ISO on a prime stopped down to f/4-5,6 to actualy make use of it.
>>4299860>But suspiciously have no stocki think adox stopped shipping to the US entirely, it's on backorder for every US seller>>4299918>US stores list prices excluding taxBecause we have different state and city taxes, not a nationwide federal sales tax, the american expectation is you should be able to calculate tax yourself.
129 dollarsMix of ORWO 100, Svema 100, Kodak Vision3 200T and 500T and Fomapan 100 and 400.git gud
>>4299933No, america is actually pretty malicious about it irl as well, literal brick and mortar stores will charge tax that is not on the price tag.
>>4299971>A brit visits america>due to excessively bread and gravy based diet, a lifetime of inhaling diesel fumes, and the crippling stress of living in 4'x6' "flats" since birth, his shrunken brain can not add 5.5% to $6>gets mad because he thinks the store is maliciously scamming him>t-here ought to be something done about this a ban maybe or a regulation, maybe a license for putting up pricetags or some...>gets mugged by a random black person while angrily staring into space and mumbling in confusion>MY LEICA! KNACKERS! HELP, POLICE! CONSTABLE! CONSTABLE!>gets arrested and patted down for drugs>A Frenchman visits america>He already knows sales tax is charged separately because he looked it up>checks the tax rate for the states he visits>sees something is $6>knows it's actually $6.33>orders a chicken sandwich from wendy's>sacre bleu this tastes like fucking garbage. did they make this out of stray cats?
>>4300177>be german>hand cashier the exact amount of cash it said on the products>leave>cashier gets mad
>>4300295based german autism
>>4300295>getman gets angry about people who collect money in a way thats superficially unfair but actually makes perfect senseI’ve seen enough hentai to know where this is going.
>>4300296>german at restaurant in US during vacation >orders the bill>already knows exactly how much to pay>leaves exactly as much cash as was listed on the menu>maybe rounds up to next full dollar if the food was good >leaves
>>4297573NC500 (shot at 200, normal dev) is unironically my favorite nu-color stock of all that I've tried.Also I'm very bummed that Phoenix turned out to be little more than nicely packaged industrial waste. Still have two rolls left and I'm praying I'll finally find a use case for it because I really wanted to love it.
>>4297128TFW pack of 5 120 Portra is nearly 100euroI pay anywayThen developing the 5 rolls is 100 euro moreOne picture is 4 euro Still pay like i'm some kind of nigger
>>4302086Mamiya rb67 + 70mm back + 65mm vision3 film is the cheapest color film possible. You need to send out to a lab that does ecn2 or develop ecn2 yourself, which is not difficult.
>>4302092you don't need to buy a jap piece of shit like that, chinks are hand rolling 65mm vision film in regular 120 spools, so you can use it in a glorious rolleiflex
>>4302098Hasselblad and linhof also make 70mm backs. It's a lot cheaper to use 70mm film canisters with 13 feet of film than getting slit and rolled vision3.The initial investment is a little pricey, but you'll start saving pretty quick. 260 bucks for a 100 foot spool of 250D, and that should get you over 300 shots of 67.
>>4299763No i wouldnt lmao
>>4302092so I need to buy more gear, more film and do more labor to pay less for my film ?
>>4302107Yes, although it may not be worthwhile if you dont shoot a lot of 120. You can also attempt to slit and back your own 120 or 220 rolls... It's a much more obnoxious and tedious process, but doesn't require nearly as much new gear.
>>4300461Post picsAlso, it's possible to get good results out of Phoenix, but you gotta change the process a lot, it's not really a c41 film
>>4297128B&H sells 400 ft rolls of Kodak Vision 3 500T which works out to ~$4.50/roll of much more advanced film stock than uktramax.
>>4297130>>4302102You're a fucking retard, DM sells packs of three for 21 bucks At least retards like you subsidize film for boomers like us who still go to real stores
>>4302133i uh, i dont have DM in my country loldo they have a website?
Shoot black and white, get pro film for 9 or 10 bucks a roll. (Delta, Tmax, Rollei).
I don't know why but I'm always content with film prices even with the inflated prices. But the development price when I send them to the lab, that's what gets me bothered. Not sure why.
>>4302133DM only sells film inside Germany (since like 2021)the employees can't even order it any more
>>4302230Or be a smart person and bulk load XX for like 4 bucks per roll...