>>4297339
>creativity is ruining your photography
My favorite part about all these negging videos is that they are essentially the same video over and over again. I can guarantee you the payoff to this video is something like
>you're focusing too much on whether or not something is "creative" is giving you paralysis, just let go of your expectations and take photos

>>4297346
>>4297339
>It really doesn't matter what other people think about your photos, I wish I knew this before I started but YOU matter. What you want and like is the main point. So anyway, thank you for watching and check out the newst part in my 200 part series where I critique and give you pointers on photos you have sent in and also whatever I found on flickr. Take care.

Dude on the bottom is right. Actually they both are, depends on what you want to do?

>>4297369
Grammer lesson: Question marks don't signify uptalking, they signify questions.

>>4297389
I missread this as "coomer lesson" and realized I needed to get the fuck out of here.

>>4297339
fujifag vs leicafag who should I trust???

>>4297494
Seek out a Pentaxian. They are immune to propaganda

>>4297389
Language lesson: written internet customs are not your ESL grammar book

>>4297498
No, they are the propaganda.

>>4297494
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGngRlWHmZw
i dont know what brand this guy even uses. canon maybe? the last time i saw him with a camera it was an ancient DSLR

what about sony+phone people?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ObSi1u6oHc

>>4298151
It actually took you 3 days to come up with a glorified "no u"? (note the proper use of the question mark)

>>4297494
fuji obviously. There's a rumor leica is prepping a x100 killer because they're real afraid of being irrelevant in 10 years and end up like Zeiss. Guess the Q series didn't make any impression among zoomers

>>4298331
Leica is expensive pentax. It's the hobby division of a much larger company. They're unkillable. All they can actually do is get even more expensive.

>>4298332
nta but being unkillable and being irrelevant aren't the same thing.

>>4298341
Even with all of fuji's market share, they are less relevant to culture and history than leica. They're just a toy brand, while Leica is a jewelry brand. It doesn't matter how much leica sells, it matters who they sell to, while fuji, sony, nikon, canon, etc already lost that game and fuji lost it extra hard by being more like funko pops.

Compare
https://leica-store.com.au/ambassadors
https://fujifilm-x.com/en-us/photographers/
Magnum vs. /p/

>>4298342
I don't care about any of that. I was just pointing out that just because a company exists doesn't mean it has relevancy.

>>4298185
>note the proper use of the question mark
your sentence is not structured in the form of a question, can you even get anything right?
>It actually took you 3 days
schizophrenic too I see

>>4298344
>I don’t care therefore it’s irrelevant
Typical narrow self centred zoomer pov tbqhwy

>>4297494
whatever Ted follows i guess
but what to I know, i'm a phaseonefag

>>4297346
Yeah. I don't watch these sort of videos on principle. I hate this style of clickbaiting.

The real black pill: No one gives a shit about your photography or wants to see the pictures you take

>>4299042
>caring about this
What xenoestrogens in the water supply does to a mf.

quick, turn your knees inwards with your feet apart and rate how womanly your figure is from 0 (straight hipped quarterback hunter gatherer chad) to 10 (if you lost the ass acne and pubic hair you could do porn). this is a foolproof test for sissification caused by plant based foods, pesticides, and plastics.

alternatively just check how many times you cared about how big a camera was in the past month

>>4299042
Look
Basically I’m just gonna keep shooting (the snapshits!!)
I'm sorry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I know..... UGH I know.....
It's just that I'm gonna keep shooting is all!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>4297339
im glad i have both of these guys blocked from my feed i hate them

>>4299042
nice try but my mom loves seeing my snapshits ;)

>>4297339
It's almost like photography youtubers are just contrarian retards who don't have any actual insight, have never produced any work of any note, and are just trying to espouse controversial viewpoints for clicks.

>>4303503
Youtube suggested me a video of some guy ranting about how no one needs high resolution cameras and he's all like "this blurry street photo with no details of interest i cropped to 2000x1000 from my sony a6dicks and it looks ok on instagram also stop cropping for reach shove your camera in peoples faces t. not a photographer not one single good photo"
meanwhile steve mccurry is shooting 61mp i guess?
lol

>>4303503
This is why I almost like a guy like Jared Polin who knows he’s a shill, is basically a professional gearfag, and doesn’t really try to talk about anything regarding ideology or romanticism of photography. Straight “new widget, use new widget, clap at shiny” type shooter. All these other navel gazing wannabe philosopher types are so annoying.

>>4303505
God fucking "youdontneedX" gearfags. Total faggots.
>I want a higher resolution camera
>No, you need to stop zooming in and cropping.
>I can't look at things both up close and far away?
>NO!
>I can't crop and still have high quality? Why not?
>NO! Quality does not matter anyways! Only content! AND GET IT RIGHT IN CAMERA THAT MEANS YOU'RE A BETTER PHOTOGRAPHER
>but lots of other photographers who are more successful than me use quality to an artistic end, and sometimes they lower it with a different lens or filter. They make big prints and small ones, and sometimes they crop and sometimes they don't.
>NO QUALITY DOESNT MATTER AND YOU CANT ZOOM IN AND YOU NEED TO JUST POST TO INSTAGRAM BECAUSE... IF YOU DONT LISTEN TO ME THEN HIGH RESOLUTION CAMERAS ARE BETTER AT SOMETHING!
>Why is that a problem
>YOU ONLY NEED A FUJI XT3!!!!! SAVE MONEY!?
>All your photos are of the backs of peoples heads. I have a job btw.
>GEARFAG NO SOUL
In other news, you dont need a car, just stop living further away from things. Oh wait, commies actually think we should live at our jobs, deep in the middle of the city, because it is better for the environment. Could it be the same people? Yes.

Fucking anti-gear gearfags, I'm going to buy a GFX100II just to spite them

>>4303514
Whatever floats your boat, man.

>>4303514
American poverty worship cult

Same reason america has no real luxury brands or high class design and everything of note is european. Opulence is a moral ill, even if its a single long lasting item, but they also want everything crap up to date right now. The newest plastic mcproduct, on credit.

>>4299042
My grandma loves the calendar I make for her every year.

>>4303524
Being thrifty is the opposite of a poverty cult, consooming in excess is how you remain poorfag

>>4303539
>I never made it from $50k a year to $50 mil because I spent $1000 more on a camera
I suppose, if your strategy for getting rich was throwing almost all of your money at a desperate bid for a 100x ie: options, crypto, leverage.

For the rest of us, it's a minor expense, and the nicer your camera is, the more competitive it will remain for the forseeable future, ie: no one will say "looks like a phone" for at least 20 years. The fuckin 5diii still looks like a hasselblad next to phones, it's just a big clunky POS.

>>4303539
there's being thrifty like "r5? got my 5dsr for a song, son!" and then there's "just dont expect anything nice, you shouldnt ever want nice things, you're doing something wrong, you dont NEED...blablabla buy this 12mp sony"

>>4303543
One frivolous expense and another and another all add up to the poorfag's perpetual credit card debt.
Have some Sam antics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4lraYMtzz4
>>4303545
Fair enough

>>4303580
>taking hyperbolic financial advice from a neckbeard
your life will not end because you bought a nicer camera

>>4298331
the q3 is superior to the x100 its just the leica jew pricing lets be honest