Why do old photographs looks so crystal sharp? Is it because of the giant glass negatives?
>>4297371Yea p much. Also you're only seeing the keepers and none of the rejects.
>>4297371They used Perfectly Clear. Please support my growing family.
>>4297371>i dont know what hyperfocal distance is>i think 2.3MP is high resolution
>>4297385Go to bed Ken
>>4297394It's hard to get any sleep in the Rockwell house.
>>4297395how the fuck did she get so fat
>>4297397GROWING FAMILYDISTENDING FAMILYEXPANDING FAMILY ENGORGING FAMILYENLARGING FAMILYSWELLING FAMILY[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2015:09:29 15:02:04Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width624Image Height800
>>4297397She's literally standing in front of the reason.
>>4297386resolution=/=sharpness
>>4297395>simp>fat>snapshit in front of the frozen food aislejesus christ ken
>>4297397
>>4297403>fatAll the better to smother me with.
>>4297406Based
>>4297395>>4297397>>4297403
>>4297414>>4297406>>4297395wait how old is she
>>4297414>the list of ken rockwell's family is incomplete>you can help by expanding itHoly fuck I would take this plap cow down to breeding barn. I'm smiling just imagining the over-saturated photos of our children
>>4297462Old enough.
>>4297414w i d e
>>4297414I'll just look at one of his landscape shots to burn my retina clean.
>>4297395THIC
>>4297397Sideways growing family
>>4297395how did you find this? its not anywhere on his site
>>4297414What made him think this awkward side eye photo was worth keeping and what stops him from taking some of that cannot POS R money and sending his kids to phys ed (aka the gym)
>>4297401>>4297386well, resolution =/= pixel dimensionsa 1mp photo can have a higher optical resolution than a 2mp photo if more details are resolved
>>4301862>well ackshuallyshut the fuck up retard
>>4301867chill out man
>>4297371They aren't apprecially sharper than a medium format camera or even a 35 taking on high quality film stock using a tripod and taking care of a good exposure with correct aperture.In terms of resolution, the lens is available back then we're deporably bad. Modern ones are so much better. Modern computer design better glasses and Coatings make a lot of difference. And also the newer film stocks are so much better than the old glass plate stuff.
>>4297414>>4297395I thought Ken Rockwell had closed up his photography site. It's got like finding one of those really old websites and realizing it's still around. Even though it hasn't had really good content or an update nor decade.
>>4302139And yet the sharpness in OP BTFO of whatever snapshit digital shit you have.
>>4302139Have you seen modern daguerrotypes?
>>4302166>3 megapixel photoAn a7s with a potato lens could do that
>>4302166I'm a hassleblad owner and I own and 8x10 gandalfi View Camera along with a bunch of digital including a 6D Mark 2>>4302186Yes and I absolutely hate that retro look.
>>4297414>>4297395Is this the same girl?
>>4302675Both his kids got fat and clearly uncomfortable with camerasSuch is life when your dad is a turbo sperg gearfag with a blog of contradictions>ken when he feels better than other people>LENS SHARPNESS DOESNT MATTER!>GEAR DOESNT MATTER ALL CAMERAS ARE GOOD BUY A D7200>ken when the only F mount pancake isnt sharp in the corners>THIS IS OVERPRICED GARBAGE>ken when he gets the one bad z7>IM BUYING AN R5 AND ALL THE RF L LENSES
>>4301867Where do you think you are nigger?
>>4297371wide equivalent FOV compared to FF. Combined with tiny apertures (everything in focus) and long exposure. Voila. Very sharp.
>>4297371>Is it because of the giant glass negatives?probably. Those large formats had to have a megapixel equivalent of like over 100. it's amazing they were able to make sharp lenses.
>>4302678>calling someone else a turbo sperg when you're the one unable to read contextual cues like the date something is published, or the shift in tone between a recommendation to a mug punter and an actual technical analysis, which he frequently gives both of, or between a statement of opinion vs fact, comparison vs absolutism, etc.
>>4300665Look under Ryan Rockwell's page.
wheres all yalls bmws at 16. gotta feed that growing senpai nigga
>>4306416>believability of ken being a millionaire from selling condos goes up 100%Wow, these iphones are amazingI can hardly tell it from his canon R5
>>4297395>Saturated fat>>4297397Saturated fat, probably.
