>The perfect mirrorless lens doesnt exi-Canon and Sony cucks on suicide watch.
>>4298609I don't like their lack of aperture ring.
>>4298610>Nikon lens w/ aperture ring>set to max aperture>flick lock tab>forget aperture ring exists>use command dial to set aperture
>>4298610Too kino for this world
>>4298610Didnt they copy Canon and literally have a customisable ring on the lens that you can set to aperture?
>>4298616have you ever used it (the nikon one)? it's terrible goes from 0 to 100 in a quarter tSSRTurn
>>4298609>f/4Too narrow. I need at MINIMUM f/2.8
>>4301206Don't you mean maximum? Since that's how the f number works? Hee heeQuite embarrassing mistake to make! Hoo hoo
>>4301206Good news, they make that lens. But it’s 24-70. Or 70-200. Both terrific lenses, I use them as my bread and butter.
>>4298609looks cool, I like the small size. Women probably like it, since it is 4 inches long.
>>4298609Fit when you feel like ken>sharpness doesn’t matter>just use this slider>i can’t tell my z8 from my iphone. bravo apple!
>>4301204Skill issue. Set it to ISO btw. >>4298610Theres an aperture ring on the front of the camera grip, fujislug. But yeah this should have been a 3 ring lens like the 24-120
>>4298609>f/4-8sad
>>4301388The only other lens like it is the 24-200 f3.5-6.3... on 2x crop.
