File: 17.jpg (1016 KB, 1626x1080)

1016 KB JPG

took my lens apart thinking there was dust inside it but it was on the viewfinder.. the lens is toast now so im thinking of getting a minolta maxxum 5 (same lens as my 400si, so i dont need to buy more filters etc) anyone have experience shooting with it?

File: RoadtripSnapshot1.jpg (1.7 MB, 2048x1358)

1.7 MB JPG

Vision3 250D kinda slaps

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2023:07:16 12:36:05
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: RoadtripSnapshot2.jpg (1.81 MB, 2048x1358)

1.81 MB JPG

>>4304710

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2023:07:16 12:35:51
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: GirlWithHourglass.jpg (3.54 MB, 1358x2048)

3.54 MB JPG

>>4304709
lmao I wish I had this confidence. To automatically jump to the most involved conclusion and fucking up royally when the most common issue ended up being... the issue.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2023:07:01 15:59:37
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 18.jpg (2.63 MB, 1592x1080)

2.63 MB JPG

>>4304713
in my defense the lens had some very stubborn dust on the front

File: pathr2.png (3.24 MB, 1733x979)

3.24 MB PNG

Guys help.
How do I get a portrait shot like this in harsh mid-day lighting?
I have a f1.4 50mm lens, and my shutter speed goes to 1000.
Do I just need to get a ND filter or am I missing something?

>>4304717
Get longer focal length lens or

You may be able to do it with a diffuser and a flash... The catch light in her eye may be a flash.

File: MuseSmall.jpg (2.14 MB, 1370x2048)

2.14 MB JPG

>>4304719
It's reflected light, not flash judging by the background.

>>4304717
I've literally got the same look smudging my lens accidentally, or once coming out of an air conditioned subway car into a humid station. You can easily get the effect with black pro mist or the like, any heavier diffusion filter would work. Just like the other guy said, but flash imo is not the answer for the light in her eyes.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2023:06:19 13:52:14
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4304723
Thanks I'm definitely going to experiment with smudging my uv filter
And the photo is a still from Picnic at Hanging Rock, and in the scene she basically looks directly at the sun.

>>4304719
Oh yeah I forgot I had a 135mm lens...I definitely think that's the solution.

File: converted.2024-04-15-0001.jpg (4.52 MB, 7141x4932)

4.52 MB JPG

bought an EOS 5 off ebay for 25 bucks and it came in. Loaded her up and slapped on the sigma 24-35/2 for a test roll and it seems to work fine. Neat-o. I know these threads tend to be heavily about larping as a film photog and so the "plasticky" electronic AF film SLRs aren't well liked, but i already love this thing. feels great in the hand, settings are simple and accessible, and i love that it rewinds with the leader sticking out lol. it's the little things.
I think i still need to tweak the scanner tho, looks stupidly soft, but i'm scanning right on the glass since i didn't get any holders with it. can't complain too bad for 20 bucks though. My test roll was also a new film to me, flicfilm pan 100, so i'm not super sure if it was the scanner or this film that's soft honestly. i need to get a loupe, any recs?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	9000F
Camera Software	RawTherapee 5.10
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	44
Vertical Resolution	44
Exposure Time	0 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Focal Length	0.00 mm

File: 2024-04-15-0016.jpg (1.32 MB, 3469x2596)

1.32 MB JPG

>>4304737
too many confounding factors. I'm using a windows laptop to get the scanner working, so i got too lazy to port my lightroom activation over. so i'm using rawtherapee which i never used before. I'm not familiar with the scanner. new film flicfilm which i'm not sure about, and i used DDx to develop which had to be a guesstimate because no times for this film available anywhere with ddx lmao. all in all i guess for a test roll we did ok.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	9000F
Camera Software	VueScan 9 x64 (9.8.32)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Left-Hand, Bottom

>>4304717
> like this in harsh mid-day lighting?
>>4304730
> from Picnic at Hanging Rock, and in the scene she basically looks directly at the sun.
Anon answered already about the tech side, now let’s talk about how movies works. This picture was not taken under the mid day sun. Even more, I’m not sure this is the sun and not a studio light. You as a viewer should believe it is but don’t grill your girlfriend under the direct sun to get the look from the movie, because you won’t.

File: 2024-04-14-0013.jpg (2.45 MB, 3419x2053)

2.45 MB JPG

>>4304740
this does look like scanner not focusing properly
>>4304737
this looks good but strange in a way that I can't pinpoint

Also test roll from the Kiev 4! Has some minimal spacing issues, but its surprisingly comfy once you learn how to do the contax grip.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:15 22:21:11
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3419
Image Height	2053

File: 2024-04-14-0004.jpg (3.17 MB, 3638x2607)

3.17 MB JPG

>>4304751
very harsh light on all of them but man that day was sunny as fuck

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:15 22:26:11
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3638
Image Height	2607

File: 2024-04-14-0011.jpg (2.22 MB, 3770x2533)

2.22 MB JPG

>>4304752
A FUCKING LEAF
But it confirms that the focusing its accurate!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:15 22:27:34
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3770
Image Height	2533

File: Screen Shot 2024-04-16 at(...).png (920 KB, 1422x1064)

920 KB PNG

>>4304705
I just got these both for $60. how'd I do ?

File: 2024-04-14-0010.jpg (1.98 MB, 3485x2053)

1.98 MB JPG

>>4304753
The bridges are so comfy in there, sadly the river has been dry for as long as I can remember.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Minolta
Camera Model	Scan Dual II
Camera Software	darktable 4.4.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:15 22:28:07
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3485
Image Height	2053

>>4304740
>rawtherapee
Read that as raw the rapee lol

picked up a roll of Portra 800, Cinestill 800T, and 3x rolls of Delta Pro 3200 for a weekend in Vegas bros including a visit to the Neon Sign Museum, hence the Cinestill

File: IMG_1522.jpg (234 KB, 1280x852)

234 KB JPG

>>4304754
Overpaid by about 50 bucks but that’s how it goes these days I guess. Back in uni in 2010 I bought a stylus mju, and the second version mju ii for like 5 bucks each at the thrift shop lol. They were on the “almost junk” wall with shit all in baggies. Nice little cameras if you weren’t shafted for em. Picrel is the only scan I can find from them anymore though . Prepare to get buttloved by nonstandard battery prices btw

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1280
Image Height	852
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4304751
Yeah I’ve been looking and there does appear to be up to 1mm thickness in the holders that I’m missing. Gonna have to 3d print out some testing jigs to find the right height. I swear the film looks sharper to the eye but then again it’s so tiny it’s hard to say.

>>4304737
>the "plasticky" electronic AF film SLRs aren't well liked
I don't think that's true it's just that they aren't talked about that much, I got a Nikon N80 and it kicks ass

>>4304757
wow consumerism! cool!
fuck off this isnt your blog and go make something useful with the film. instant of fagging it up in here. fag

>>4304751
Kiev 4 is a lovely cam, prolly one of the best cams to come out of the soviet union.

>>4304757
The secret to a quality gearfagging post is that you wait until after your trip to talk about the film you used while simultaneously dumping the nice pics you took with said film. I know you're excited, but we have jaded and grumpy boomer zoomer super serious artistès in this thread that you must respect.

I have a very cool, rare, and unusual camera coming in the mail, but I will wait until I have decent images to share before even mentioning it.

>>4304769
Ok, Ukrainian here. Could you please explain me why westerners fagging around soviet cameras so much? They aren't good nor reliable, The only one advantage is price (I mean, 15-20 euros is okay, why not) but for you these cameras and lenses cost like Japanese and German ones?
Every time I see how you memeing with these Kievs and Feds I just can't fucking understand what is the point? I have this consumer beehive-motivation every time like "yeah, everybody likes and I should try" but then I remember that my father, grandfathers and uncle, all of them hated soviet cameras and was really excited to see Minolta X700, how nice it is, bright, how good lens is.
So, without memes. Why westerners likes this?

File: 187061d1501215814-yet-ano(...).jpg (143 KB, 1000x510)

143 KB JPG

>>4304775
it's about the novelty of owning something built on the other side of the iron curtain

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi
Image Created	2010:09:09 21:51:56
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	510

>>4304775
Ok so, kiev 4's can be had for basically pocket change, and in return you get a pretty well built interchangeable lens rangefinder that's quite comfy to use.
That's why I like it.

>>4304766
>N80
Man I got one of those with the plastic 50mm and I can't believe how fun it is. It's so much lighter than all my mechanical cameras and focus+exposure is always dead on with no effort so I can just shoot and not worry about it.
Shame about the film door being designed to break so easy, but it's not a difficult fix.

>>4304782
>basically pocket change
CLA cost not included as I see.
>interchangeable
yeah, maybe this is the reason.
>>4304776
Some kind of cargo cult or just a part of a snow-bears-gypsies-lenin-vodka exotic?

>>4304775
Soviet shit in general is built in such a archaic and ass-backward way that it comes off as quaint and endearing. And when your hobby involves doing things in a deliberately less convenient and outdated manner, of course soviet cameras are the logical next step. Also they look cool.

>>4304762
>Overpaid by about 50 bucks

funny. I can sell them for over $100 a piece on ebay. I might throw a roll in each and call it quits. lumix s5 is my jam.

>>4304775
Because it's a copy of the Contax IIa but made in vast amounts for a longer time so there's a higher chance of you getting a working model. Iirc the Contax IIa/Kiev 4 have the longest flange distance so technically the most accurate rangefinder too.

>>4304768
>>4304770
didn't ask

>>4304757
>Cinestill 800T
Please stop giving money to trademark trolls

>>4304797

You were practically begging for it nophoto. Now go out there and waste that film on nothing and come back here and whine about how the photos are shit.

>sunny 16 rule
Is it basically just set box speed to f16 on your camera? If so does that mean if I want to push one stop to put half the box speed at f16 instead?

>>4304810
It means that if you set aperture to 16 and ISO to box speed, if it's bright and sunny out you can match your shutter speed to your ISO and will get roughly proper exposure. It doesn't really matter how you go up or down stops, you can do it with aperture, shutter, or ISO.

>>4304775
It makes literal boomers seethe.
Also jap cameras are gay, and the only German stuff that I can afford is the one built in the DDR, but Pentacon never built a rangefinder so Soviet shit it is.

File: EV_CalExamplef4_200.jpg (167 KB, 1008x308)

167 KB JPG

>>4304810
sunny 16 is just "daylight is EV 14.5" use whatever settings you want to get there

>>4304812
If you adjust aperture, and it’s set to box spot, it won’t push the film. You’d need to adjust iso down ever how many stops you wanna push if you want to push evenly across aperture. You could also just adjust shutter speed down a stop

>>4304819
Late 80s through mid to late 90s japshit is nice.

>>4304823
Pushing happens during development, it doesn't matter what your camera settings were. It might be over or underexposed but that's your problem innit?

>>4304788
both the kievs I had required no cla and if you have issues with one you just buy a new one and sell the old one for as much as you bought it for

>Pentax 67

What's the deal on these? I already have 3 medium format but nothing in 6x7

>>4304862
67 is like 645, but based.

>>4304862
Suited for tripod work only

>>4304873
what did he mean by this

>>4304876
How to call a camera fat without calling it fat.

>>4304876
It's near unusable at hand held speeds. Similar to the 500cm series.

File: 20240416_102827.jpg (2.5 MB, 1670x3707)

2.5 MB JPG

Got my third cactus shot done. Tricky shot that needed tilt and swing for good focus. Once the varnish dries I will be mounting/matting the 3 in one frame. Should be a pretty cool piece. Very fun bit of practice.

That landscape is shot is my current nemesis. I've been trying to take a good picture of it, but the exposure and constantly changing light makes it extremely difficult to pull off. Super fun.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXBC
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:16 10:28:27
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	8.9 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	3/2500 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	16
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4304879
>How to call a camera fat without calling it fat.
go to gym soj fag

>>4304880
>unusable handheld
Pathetic basedboy lmao. I’ve handheld my gx680 with its max 1/400 and it’s been fine. Get good.

File: handheld.jpg (2.3 MB, 1365x2048)

2.3 MB JPG

>>4304880
Lift some weights goddamn. Why would you out yourself like this? Limp wristed mf.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:16 14:05:04
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4304880
To be fair 67 really excels on a tripod almost regardless of model

File: Image 1 (3).jpg (1.28 MB, 2722x2173)

1.28 MB JPG

Aaaaand here is a scan of one that I varnished.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	13610
Image Height	10868
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:16 11:04:56
Color Space Information	sRGB
Light Source	Unknown

>>4304892
And the pics will suck shooting under 1/60

>>4304892
But what was your lens' focal length?

I can use my linhof handheld shooting 67 with a 150mm at 1/125 and there's no motion blur. I have an anatomical grip for it, which helps tremendously.

If I go to 270mm my hit rate drops significantly.. :(

>>4304923
>there's no motion blur
[x] doubt
"mirror slap doesnt do anything" tier
Post a linhof 67 150mm at 1/125 photo

>>4304923
Post lenhof. I thought they only made 6x7 field cameras.

>>4304903
Not sure what's going on here, it appears to be some kind of plant(?) on top of scrap metal and some of it is wet. It's not telling me anything about the fine details of a cactus.

Then you have redditors doing this
https://www.reddit.com/r/largeformat/comments/uc0ho5/first_macro_shot_on_4x5_crown_graphic_tmax_100/

>>4304944
>a photo of literal bark
why are 4x5 sisters like this

File: 2780 041124 3-008.jpg (2.67 MB, 3007x2016)

2.67 MB JPG

Does this lens make my dogs nose look big

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3007
Image Height	2016
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>4304951
>a photo of figurative bark
35mm pushing art forward as always

File: 20240129_142200.jpg (2.11 MB, 2736x2368)

2.11 MB JPG

>>4304943
>>4304940
Linhoflets. That horse picture I posted last thread was taken with this camera and a 67 back.

Linhof made a weird and somewhat rare handheld 67 camera that takes vertical shots. I'll post it in a sec. They're cool.

>>4304944
It's part of a series, so it will make enough sense. It's also supposed to be sort of abstract. Lastly the three images I took and will frame are an exercise in producing a finished and framed piece of work using metal plates. I'll post a nice picture of the final piece when I finish it so you guys can tell me it sucks.

>>4304947
We are too overcome by the technical hurdles of using a 4x5 camera, and enamoured by the envisioned image quality to actually take good pictures. It's really that simple. Only half joking.

Alsooooo you cannot really understand the real IQ of large format from scans. You have to print them. Even a 4x5 contact print you hold in your hand will absolutely btfo and scan.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UEU9EWL2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	25 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	2736
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:01:29 14:22:00
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	3648
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	M10XLNF00AM
Image Height	2736
Brightness	6.6 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	3/1000 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/2.2
ISO Speed Rating	50
Image Width	3648
Focal Length	3.80 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4304957
>asked for handheld photo taken with a linhof
>posts photo of handholding a linhof
Got dam

File: Screenshot_20240309_08440(...).jpg (389 KB, 1440x1649)

389 KB JPG

>>4304943
Look at this goofy ass camera. It's actually a great and inexpensive option to get into 67 format.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Android UP1A.231005.007.G998U1UESAFXAB
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1440
Image Height	1649

File: Image 12 (1) (1).jpg (3.06 MB, 2882x3655)

3.06 MB JPG

>>4304958
Yeah, I know I'm based.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	7207
Image Height	9139
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:16 13:03:02
Color Space Information	sRGB
Light Source	Unknown

File: Something_of_a_Scientist.jpg (171 KB, 945x609)

171 KB JPG

>blix part A in the first bottle
>blix part B and developer in the second bottle
well there goes my dream of one day upskilling to meth cook

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	paint.net 4.1.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi

>>4304966
Careful. I hear that makes mustard gas.

>>4304965
Very slightly soft, probably hand shake

>>4304968
It was discussed in the other thread that my sharp for the time lens is soft as a babies bottom for your modern pixel peeper.

>>4304970
Lens sharpness depends on enlargement factor.

This image just has the signature haziness of a vibrating camera.

File: Image 5 (3).jpg (3.29 MB, 2882x3655)

3.29 MB JPG

>>4304973
Very slightly soft proves my point when using a 7lb camera handheld.

This may have been at 1/250, but I'm unsure.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.1 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	7207
Image Height	9139
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:03:15 22:03:42
Color Space Information	sRGB
Light Source	Unknown

>>4304775
>They aren't good nor reliable
Kievs are

Is there a real non-autistic non-pixel peeping reason to not just live on a steady diet of kentmere 100/400? Seems to do everything I want while being the cheapest readily available brand to me. What would I tangibly truly appreciably get from shooting a roll of T-max that costs 3x as much here?

>>4304976
Not sharp

>>4305010
not really, if it works well with your usual developer and you like the results just go for it.

niggas always complain about the lack of contrast but you can fix that in post, be either digital or a print.

File: IMG_5444.jpg (2.5 MB, 1470x1470)

2.5 MB JPG

>>4304965
>>4304976
These are not sharp.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	144 dpi
Vertical Resolution	144 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1470
Image Height	1470

File: HandheldCropSmall.jpg (3.03 MB, 1537x2048)

3.03 MB JPG

>>4304880
Get some forearm strength goddamn. 5.6 @ 1/30

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:16 18:41:34
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4305020
>>4305013
Gearfagging pixel peepers begone.

File: HandheldCrop2Small.jpg (3.06 MB, 1537x2048)

3.06 MB JPG

>>4305024
mfs never did physical activity in their life and it shows. Go on a hike, do a lap, lift something and sweat a little like damn. Telling others a medium format is unusable off a tripod is pathetic and funny at the same time.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:16 18:45:09
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4305026
>>4305024
Cute, would sniff.

File: E100-1.jpg (3.24 MB, 2048x2048)

3.24 MB JPG

>>4305028
lmao are you the same guy that said something like that about the other girl I posted in the previous thread or the black model stepping out the taxi before that?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:16 19:01:16
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4305025
I’m not gearfagging. The pic I posted was taken on a 50 year old camera.

File: IMG_5445.jpg (2.14 MB, 1083x1495)

2.14 MB JPG

>>4305032
Forgot to post another pic taken on a different 50 year old camera. Face it medium format, sucks for hand holding, unless in bright sunlight. I say this as someone who shoots 90% MF.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	144 dpi
Vertical Resolution	144 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1083
Image Height	1495

>>4305031
Anymore of the woman painting?

>>4305033
Not necessarily. Its just that heavy cameras in general suck for handheld. Mamiya 6 or rolleiflex is great for handheld. Doesnt matter the format, although the larger the format the more demanding it becomes to get the absolute best quality you can from it.

>>4305036
A rolleiflex doesn’t have a mirror to slap does it?

>>4305042
Neither does a linhof super technika. I would kindly request you refrain from changing the goalposts. Are we talking mirror slappers or just MF in general???

>>4305045
Holy fuck anon chill out I’m not the anon who was talking about medium format I just asked a simple question.

Do you go around this confrontational in your day to day life?

File: portra160_detail.jpg (2.48 MB, 3296x2267)

2.48 MB JPG

Hot damn I didn't know this level of detail was possible on 35mm
all the ecelebs seem to poopoo portra as "boring" but I'm thinking I need to shoot more of it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.36
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	850 dpi
Vertical Resolution	850 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:16 19:13:00
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4305047
Oh, my bad. A rolleiflex does not have a mirror to slap. It has a second lens to show you the image at all times. It's a leaf shutter like a 4x5 camera.

>>4305051
If a 4x5 doesn’t have it why are they so hard to handhold?

>>4305052
Because they weigh a lot, they have poor balance, the DoF is significantly smaller for an equivalent focal length, and any imperfection in your technique is blaringly obvious with such a large negative. Using a viewfinder + rangefinder combo is very difficult as well.

They are very demanding cameras to use even with a tripod, and people are not willing to recognize that.

What's a good cheap to mid budget medium format camera?

File: C02E3476-5E2D-4EE2-A115-6(...).jpg (160 KB, 750x1334)

160 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Instagram
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	750
Image Height	1334

>>4305062
Any folder. just test shutter speeds beforehand, there's only like 3 or 4.
They can usually be had for single digits of dollars.

>>4305063
Why are the veins like that

>>4305063
What did he mean by this?

>>4305063
silent hill is looking dope
>>4305062
A TLR or a folder one, the ones that go for meme prices are the shitty japs ones

>>4305067
AIDS and sepsis from a necrotic prolapse

>>4305067
>>4305083
Infrared film w/ infrared flash :)

Ooh and aids yeeeeaaah

>>4305063
Post somewhere unedited.

>>4305033
Technique issue. Looks like your scans aren’t focused desu.

File: converted.2024-04-16-0001.jpg (1.1 MB, 4000x2709)

1.1 MB JPG

>>4304740
>>4304751
>>4304763
further dinking around with this test roll, i think the camera and development were fine, it's the scanner that needs to be nailed in. 3d printed a thin spacer and the scans look a lot better. i think i've got some residual digital expectation and feel like it still isnt' sharp enough, but honestly its probably good enough. have a mirror snapshit. surprised the rudimentary AF on the eos 5 managed it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	9000F
Camera Software	RawTherapee 5.10
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	43
Vertical Resolution	43
Exposure Time	0 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Focal Length	0.00 mm

>tfw no 4x5 sovietshit camera

JUST

>>4305119
I got you, bro. It is not a soviet camera, but this bundle will get you started for cheap, and people will think you have wasted all your inheritance money on shitty camera gear.

Get a 50 pack of foma100 for like 75 bucks.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/135014709814

https://youtu.be/uCcpIqlmWrI?si=_uxVjhB_NFgOTdh6

Is this a good way developing in E-6 process?
I'm trying to figure out how to do it economically
without spending to much on developer gear like Jobo.
Or do I really need something like Jobo CPE-2 or something similar?

>>4305143
I wouldn’t recommend. I have tried once with my sous vide and the temperature jumped +/- 1.2 C during the development and colors were a bit off compared to lab developing. For expired stocks it doesn’t matter I guess but for fresh ones I decided to pay more but be sure in the result.

>>4305033
Literal skill issue. I've used my Hassie down to the notch in-between 1/15 and 1/30. Hell I gave you a couple examples in this thread of my shots at 1/30 and I did the same in the previous thread but I see you changing goalposts.

>>4305156
I found some relatively cheap temp controlled bath on ali this could solve problem with precise temperature
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4001358444855.html

File: 25465474.jpg (4.84 MB, 3915x2689)

4.84 MB JPG

Minolta x-300s, kentmere Pan 100
I like to make very boring shots of modernism
is the white scratch a fuck up by lab?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-2000
Camera Software	ACD Systems Digital Imaging
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4425
Image Height	3038
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2024:04:16 12:20:30

>>4305186
>chinkshit
>precise
ehh, maybe

>>4305186
bruh just buy a sous vide theyre readily available

>>4304965
This is soft and has a useless blurry foreground

At least most of the pubes were cleaned off right?

>>4304976
Also soft

Try shooting superior 35mm and using a lab. 4x5 resolution wank gets you nowhere.

i have half a roll of 5222 and a good 4-5 hours in toulouse tomorrow
any good stuff to shoot?

>>4305219
You mean an immersion circulator, fren?

>>4305229
Pixel peeping gearfaggot does not realize she is looking at OBVIOUS 67 format shots. SAD!

Opinion in the trash. You know nothing and it really shows.

>>4304965
I thought about composition and this photo is nearly unsalvageable

Blurry grass below, sky is too bright for the shadows without a gnd, shoot horizontal or get closer at that angle and it emphasizes the dog is in a corner and he looks stressed out, get closer and shoot head on and its just a dog in front of plywood

Maybe the best thing to do would have been to take photos somewhere other than the county dump. Then add how its blurry and dirty. Its not lookin good cunt.

>>4305237
>pixel peeping
If i was pixel peeping id know it was 6x7

Its just a bit soft. At normal screen sizes its soft. Zoomed out on a tiny phone screen its still soft and hazy. There’s no definition. The midtones are mud. Rescan if its salveageable but the composition aint great.

>>4305240
Imagine writing an essay about an obvious test shot.

Go to bed, nophoto.

>>4305240
I think the opposite, it could fool me for a historical artifact from around 1917 precisely because of its "flaws".

>>4305242
Are all your photos just test shots? Lol. Maybe all the fancy grain peeper gear is distracting you from basic photography and you should take a break and use a normal camera for a while. May i recommend a nikon FA?

>>4305243
German shepherds didnt look that inbred in 1917, they still looked like skinny wolves. 1917 was also either way sharper from huge plates or way worse in every way from shitty super slow and rough emulsions.

File: IMG_9568.jpg (341 KB, 2048x1544)

341 KB JPG

>>4305246
I found a german shepherd photo from 1921

It has a lot more contrast and definition so you dont need to squint or zoom in to see what’s there. I was wrong. Photography in the 1910s and 20s was actually better than that.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1544
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4305248
>dirty negative
>motion blurred dog
>still technically and artistically superior because they used light and shadow which gave things shape instead of pointing the camera at the void ala digislugs afraid of blowing highlights
>also sharper probably because they got gud
based

>>4305248
You know they asked me to post a photo I took at 1/125 or less, so I chose one that was clearly in shadow that was in focus? Only reason I posted it...

It's ultra shitty aristaedu 400 speed film also.

>>4305250
Next time shoot in daylight at a smaller aperture if aiming for that shutter speed (it would improve your vaseline coated lens)

Nophoto loser proves herself to be incredibly stupid yet again. Color me suprised!

File: 9djfbt4in4771.jpg (179 KB, 1024x667)

179 KB JPG

>>4305246
Not so clear cut to me, this is from 1916.
>>4305248
It has D&B. Have you even read Adams?

>>4305255
Still sharper
Still better defined
Still a less inbred looking dog

Has photography gotten worse?

File: pathetic.jpg (8 KB, 198x255)

8 KB JPG

>>4305256
So you haven't read Adams, explains why you don't realize the negative isn't the print.

>>4305257
We have photoshop now.

Scans are prints. And shooting underexposed dogs in shadow cant be salvaged with D&B, on complex subjects the halo is unmistakable.

>>4305258
There's plenty of D&B in the pictures you praised, you're just too artistically blind to realize it.

>>4305119
Look up fkd view cameras.

>>4304873
>>4304879
>>4304880
get >>>/fit/ you faggots
on the other hand most faggots are into 67 so it kinda checks out

Is mirror lockup (or no mirror like a rolleiflex) a necessity for hand shooting MF at lower speeds?

File: Untitled (107).png (4.72 MB, 1260x1852)

4.72 MB PNG

>>4305010
just shot my first roll of kentmere 400, and thought it was a great film. Gonna be shooting more of it- i think it make take the place of ilford hp5+ desu but might still be too early

>>4305355
mmm potatoes

>>4305063
lmao i remember you from a few threads ago. how much have you spent on hookers?

File: Untitled (104) 22.png (2.16 MB, 1066x1338)

2.16 MB PNG

>>4305375
Why so curious lmao

>>4305350
the bigger the mirror the bigger slap, so yeah it's a big plus if you want to avoid shaking.
it's not a necessity when you apply the handheld speed to focal ratio (shooting 180mm -> handheld no slower than 1/180s)

>>4305350
Greatly depends on model.

>>4305395
Problem with this is most medium format cameras have comparably long focal lengths compared to 135

>>4305395
>>4305437
That rule doesn't apply for MF cams you'll need to convert it to whatever equivalence

>>4305444
Yes it does

>>4305444
I have zero evidence to back this up but I would assume if you want to capture full detail it would still apply. MF captures more detail so you need less shake than on 35mm for the same FOV. If you're just gonna scale your MF images down to 35mm size then sure, crop factor is probably relevant.

File: no mlu.jpg (3.55 MB, 1536x2048)

3.55 MB JPG

>>4305350
Once again posting this set of photos.

This one is no mirror lock up @ 5.6, 1/30

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:18 09:40:12
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: mlu.jpg (2.86 MB, 1536x2048)

2.86 MB JPG

>>4305462

This is with mirror lock up @ 5.6, 1/30.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:18 09:40:24
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 5.6 1 second.jpg (1.55 MB, 2048x1622)

1.55 MB JPG

>>4305333

I find it really funny that I keep posting examples of MF and LF being usable handheld like above and telling mfs to go lift some weights but they're only arguing amongst each other and with people that have photos they can shoehorn and rationalize as bad for whatever reason.

Here's a LF handheld although I did use the neck strap and my core to stabilize. Or is using your muscles cheating? I know some of y'all don't have any. Remember to breathe out slot and steadily as you press the shutter.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:03 12:06:47
ISO Speed Rating	100
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash
Color Space Information	sRGB

>look at me I am a badass that shoots handheld LF
>That is why I take photos of fucking walls
Clowns

File: go outside .jpg (3.09 MB, 1537x2048)

3.09 MB JPG

>>4305469

Awe someone's upset, I see you moving goalposts. Point is LF can be handheld. What about my other posts tho?

>>4305463
>>4305462
>>4305026
>>4305024

Go outside.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:18 10:06:40
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4305469
>did you just photograph something that doesn't interest me
Whats the source of your cope, creepshots of strangers or meeting 4/10 women on craigslist and signing a no-touchy contract while their boyfriend watches? just guessin based on the output of the average photographer who hates architecture, landscapes, etc (and it's always photographers, just like how only photographers really hate or really love street)

File: go outside 2.jpg (2.49 MB, 1358x2048)

2.49 MB JPG

>>4305471

Reminds me why I only show up once a day or sometimes once a week. Sometimes not at all. Just like the other Brazilian dude that was obsessed with some blurry cock in one of my shitpost photos. Full of cope and anger, eating it up the second I posted a shit photo and he finally had some "fuel" to say something but never replying to the good ones. They only speak up if you post something shit, try it out and see. It's like they finally have confidence to say something when they see work they can tear into. Not realizing it's bait. Like yeah dude it's a window with graffiti, but that wasn't the point. Second he couldn't say it was blurry or out of focus he decided to cry about subject matter.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:18 10:18:11
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4305472
Maybe thats because /p/ is inundated with trash snapshits where the only critique besides “sell your camera” is “out of focus” (always has been)

>>4305472
Nice critique and nice photo. I like how you contextualized the portrait with the framing.

>>4305484
Nophoto misses his point so badly he ends up proving it. Lol. Nice.

File: lazy afternoon .jpg (3.35 MB, 2048x1494)

3.35 MB JPG

>>4305486
Thanks, I wish I had my 50mm that day. And I wish I had crouched a but to get down to his sightline. I guessed the exposure and took the shot regardless. I have to get comfortable with taking my time. I rushed because subconsciously I didn't want to waste his time but I have to remind myself that people already agreed to their portrait being taken so it's okay to take my time.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:04:18 12:21:56
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4305472
>>4305470
>>4305463
>>4305462
>inconviemces others with your snapshit hobby


Maybe one day you will learn how to be a real artist.

File: [9] Kodak Tri-X 400_nobor(...).jpg (4.58 MB, 4061x2753)

4.58 MB JPG

It's been a long time since I've shot as carelessly as with this roll
Got a couple of shots I liked, though

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:18 12:58:47
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	1.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4305526
I see a border you damn liar.

>street photography is trash!
>but wall photography is cool
mental illness

> see a deal of 15 rolls for 80 bucks >message seller, just missed on it
>see the same films re-posted in split lots for three times as much by some hideous bugwoman after the original seller told me he no longer had them
These fucking people are scum. Allowing immigration was a mistake, legal or otherwise.

File: [11] Kodak Tri-X 400_nobo(...).jpg (4.19 MB, 4190x2766)

4.19 MB JPG

>>4305530
>LMAO for realzies™

the other ones I like are of friends, so i'm not posting them
and then there are these ones that are like
>snapshitty in execution but I think they could be really nice if more polished
>but at the same time it's kinda hard to get them polished because they could only be made precisely because they were kinda careless indeed

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:18 13:08:31
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	1.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4305379
i remember in the other thread you had like 5 different ones and on top of the price of film its gotta be like 90% of your money goes to this hobby

>>4305587
Imagine NOT dwindling your inheritance on hookers, vintage cameras, and film.

File: CNV000023.jpg (2.23 MB, 2655x1823)

2.23 MB JPG

does anyone have idea if these flares are just lens flare or a light leak? On the film itself it looks symmetrical from one frame to the other, but it appears only on few frames in the middle of the roll

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4425
Image Height	3038
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format

>>4305595
show negative

File: [17] Aerovaldo - 120-Pano(...).jpg (3.98 MB, 6454x5321)

3.98 MB JPG

>vroom

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 15.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:19 00:16:47
Exposure Time	1/90 sec
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	2.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 1713526234468.jpg (2.44 MB, 3642x2274)

2.44 MB JPG

>>4305648
sorry for the shit pics
doesn't look too good, flares I meant are marked, and I actually saw there is more of them on the roll just most of the time they are very faint
weird

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Sensing Method	Unknown
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4640
Image Height	2088
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Exposure Program	Not Defined
Brightness	0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	D65
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4640
Image Height	2088
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4305595
>>4305672
Tbh they look more like light leaks to me, they are too uniform to be lens flare and they are across different frames. Your shutter may not be opening/closing correctly

>>4305595
>>4305672
light leaks
if you can recall where the sun was coming from on your most impacted photos, you can narrow down the location of where the leak is otherwise I'd just repair and replace all of your light seals

File: IMG_20240419_130552.jpg (158 KB, 1080x975)

158 KB JPG

>>4305649
Posted this same photo in the car photos thread
>quality critique
Never change, 4chan

File: IMG_20240419_184420_545.jpg (197 KB, 1280x853)

197 KB JPG

>>4305735
I'll critique it.
Rear wheel is weirdly cut off instead of completely omitted or fully included.
Weird angles in background dont go well with the 90 degree angle of the car.
Super distracting foreground object.
Lighting is ugly, doesn't help accent the curves of the car.
Whole image looks way too gritty for the subject and environment.

What you should have done here is picked a completely different angle and focused more on the actual car because the surroundings have nothing of value as far as I can see.

Just my 2 cents.

>>4305742
Thanks, man
I don't even think it's that good of a photo either, I just thought that whole interaction was kinda wild lol
Thanks for the comments
Unfortunately I couldn't do anything about the lighting (it's in a store) and the rear part (there was a pillar and a security guard telling me I couldn't take pictures with my camera, although it was okay to take photos with my phone for apparently no real reason)
Not an ideal situation, but not an excuse for a sub-optimal photo, I must agree
Although I don't think it's atrocious either kek

>>4305742
Quality critique and I agree. I didn't respond to the image when I saw it because I didn't know he wanted critique and in my past experience when I critique people lash out.

>>4305752
Feel free to contribute, man
Saying "yo that looks atrocious, and no, I will not explain any further" is pathetic, but offering actual criticism like the other guy did is literally the main reason I post on 4chins

File: 20240419_133526.jpg (808 KB, 1593x2321)

808 KB JPG

And it BEGINS! HAHAHA.

Still have to spend a decent bit more time on this print. I couldn't help but make an 8x10 really quick.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXBC
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:19 13:35:26
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	10.3 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	1/2500 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	16
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4305830
yo that looks atrocious, and no, I will not explain any further

File: 20240419_134204.jpg (352 KB, 1181x873)

352 KB JPG

>>4305832
Said the same about your mother before I spent a little more time in the darkroom fixing her up!

OH BABY! WE ARE SO BACK.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXBC
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	13 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:19 13:42:04
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	0.8 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/2.2
ISO Speed Rating	320
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	2.20 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4305830
>>4305833
>Underexposed as fucking fuck
I consider this guy a troll, I have no other explanation why he is so unbelievably bad at everything he does.

>>4305837
You simply cannot read can you? I have testinf of my enlarger that needs doing before I actually spend time on a print. Idiot.

>>4305839
And what is the result of this kind of testing? Image can be printed on paper and developer works?
This is ridiculous. I have nothing to say.
Man you have built a reputation already, this is not a thing that can be easily ignored. Just try to make something correct. Please. Not only you but all of us need this.

>>4305841
You sound like a filthy no print from your sheer ignorance alone. My advice? Stop getting so angry at images on the internet. Your life will improve.

It was my first print in over 5 years and I was just excited to share that I'm back in business. I even said it was shit. You think I'm done working on one of my favorite images of my dog when it looks like that? Are you really that incredibly stupid?

>>4305847
Maybe, just maybe, we don’t need to see every step in your “process.”

File: 20240419_145239.jpg (1.14 MB, 1795x2748)

1.14 MB JPG

Having a test print to check that the grain is focused made a major difference in how sharp this print looks now. Added an extra bit of time, and got my background exposed. I figured out that the vario-contrast setting was not activated, so now I can start bumping up the contrast.

Sadly I did not fix it for long enough. I need a darkroom timer... My setup is far from ideal, but I'm making it work.l in my 4x4 tent. Hah.


>>4305857
And your autistic whining about an obvious test print?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXBC
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:19 14:52:39
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	10.4 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	1/2500 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	16
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4305859
yo that still looks atrocious, and no, I will not explain any further

File: 20240419_151826.jpg (1.45 MB, 1793x2388)

1.45 MB JPG

Contrast +2. Think I may like +.5 best. It's a little too harsh right now...

It's kinda fun sharing my process, but I'm not going to often after today. I think I'm one of maybe 3 people that I've ever seen post actual prints on here, so you can't say it isn't fresh and new content!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXBC
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:19 15:18:26
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	10.0 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	1/2000 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	16
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

File: 20240419_153530.jpg (1.12 MB, 2490x1390)

1.12 MB JPG

>>4305873
There it is. +.75 seems perfect for my tastes. :D

I could probably add a few more seconds to get some pure black in there, and it may be even nicer. I'll decide on that when my print dries.

Onto an image with corner to corner focus for more testing. I'm not going to post anymore about my darkroom fun. Thanks for reading my blog.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXBC
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:19 15:35:30
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	9.9 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	3/5000 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	16
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4305878
Not a bad portrait of your doggo. Your haters are seething at your accomplishments.

>>4305878
looks like you got a little too excited about getting the right contrast.. whats that shadow doghairanon?

File: 20240419_160224.jpg (1.63 MB, 1800x3630)

1.63 MB JPG

Please observe what it means to want it and get it.

These darkroom tents were on sale at b&h for like 200 bucks. That's cheaper than the large film changing bags by over 150 bucks.

>>4305883
:D Always.

>>4305885
I could not can-tain myself. I'm sorry.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXBC
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	13 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:19 16:02:25
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	147/2500 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/2.2
ISO Speed Rating	2500
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	2.20 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>should I try porta 800

90% of the color I shoot is e100 with a little gold 200. Never tried porta at all but thought 800 would be good for some indoor shooting.

File: 20240419_192650.jpg (1014 KB, 2164x1800)

1014 KB JPG

1:15 exposure at 0 contrast. Dodge bottom half for 45 seconds. 10 seconds at +4 contrast. Bam. This scene was very high contrast, so it was extra fun to try and get everything nice looking.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXBC
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:04:19 19:26:51
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	4.7 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	83/10000 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	50
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

MF chads - what's your favorite format and film stock?

>>4305959
6x6, Rollei retro 80s

>>4304737
Those kinds of film cameras are my favorite because they have neat features and haven’t had prices driven up into space by hipsters.