How did they get blown the F out by Nikon off all people?>artemis mission back to the moon >using Nikon Z9 instead of glorious German 100mp[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution71 dpiVertical Resolution71 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width750Image Height750Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4304860hasselblads are studio babies for shooting clothing ads now, they don't have the quality they did in the film dayshttps://fstoppers.com/originals/hasselblad-h6d-100c-comparison-review-full-frame-out-performs-medium-format-191500
>>4304860It's swedish you mongrel
>>4304865Scandinavia is rightful Germanic clay.
>>4304860NASA didn't use the H series either, did they?
>>4304860>>4304863most likely the body is good but the lenses suck, also the test is perhaps quite wrongly done
>>4304860>Germanthey're chinese now, just like jaguars/land rovers have been indian for the past 15 years
>>4304865>It's swedish you mongrelchinese you retardhttps://www.slrlounge.com/dji-now-majority-shareholder-of-hasselblad-what-does-that-mean/
>>4304863This shit the bed when they insisted when they went to digital on screwing over the people had the Legacy hardware and not supporting the lenses and bodies that people had spent thousands of dollars on. Just like contax did
>>4304897Germany doesnt even rightfully own their own clay, fuckin made up country.
>>4304863>>4304860High end fashion studios = Phase one IQ4Under of that budget is matter = hassel mirrorless or old Phase ones or old hasselsidk what's the clue of current H system. that 400mp is not a real 400mp. it's amplified.
>>4304860>artemis mission back to the moonspace is fake and gay, sorry. Nobody has been there.
>>4305973Several hundred pounds of moon rocks disagree.
>>4305973The LRO took pictures of the landing sitesPictures were taken by hand on the moonAnd now a z9’s going to the moon so cONTROLLED oPPOSITION will say, nonsensically, it was AI generated because it wasnt a canon 5d (a canon 5d would die halfway through the trip lol)
>>4306240I wouldn't believe that bullshit even if it were taken with a reflex. Because what NASA shows and what they label it as matters a lot more. AI in mirrorless is a concern because it can replace what people would see with an optical device. NASA didn't need AI to fake the moon landing, just a studio and some actors willing to play the part.
>>4306251The evidence is overwhelming. The skepticism has been debunked so many times that you need to believe in AI live editing EVFs to keep up the denial.Russians, due to being low IQ homosexuals, lost the space race. And Nikon was always better than canon
>>4306251congratulations, you're the ultimate retard
>>4306251>noooooo i just won't believe 15,000 6x6 medium format frames of film>a studio is just as good!Stop being a retard.
>>4305916Did you have a stroke
>>4306253ai live editing evf is possible, or atleast camera can recognize scene and take a picture
>>4304863>mogged by iPhone lenslmao
>>4309859It's not possible with camera processors so shit they struggle to do HDR and panorama alignment 50% as well as right clicking in capture one
>>4304860>artemis mission back to the moonThere is no easy way for me to tell you this so I'll make it short and straight to the point.Space is fakeNukes are a hoaxEvolution is a lieEarth is flatDinosaurs never existed.
