File: ge-spooky2.webm (2.9 MB, 583x546)

2.9 MB WEBM

>>4314064

File: GE_newcam1(20240430-172524).jpg (33 KB, 640x480)

33 KB JPG

raw CCD output

File: ge-skate.webm (1.67 MB, 720x514)

1.67 MB WEBM

At this point I got about 2 hours of VHS recordings from the last year. I've posted it to YT and even tried tiktok with zero exposure

>>4314071
That actually does look pretty good.
What's this one from?

File: GE_storm(20240515-131304).png (824 KB, 640x480)

824 KB PNG

>>4314075
an 80s Panasonic camera, in low light it gets noisy, but in daylight it does well.

File: GE_storm(20240515-134159).jpg (209 KB, 640x480)

209 KB JPG

>>4314078

>>4314064
just make a v/h/s ripoff and people will ate that shit up

>>4314087
I can do plenty of VHS recordings but I want to make some money off this. If I could sell sessions for $40 I could pay for all the equipment and batteries I bought in 2 sessions. I have two identical cameras so I can even go for the multi-angle artistc approachic

>>4314064
I'm a little confused here, what's going on?
I understand you are hacking old cameras and shooting to a secondary slave device rather than recording to VHS, but this looks decent.

Was interlacing shit done between the sensor readout and writing to VHS and did you bypass that for a real 60p global shutter 640x480 feed? or did you de-interlace this? or is this footage sped up?

File: ge-vhscapture4.webm (3.59 MB, 678x462)

3.59 MB WEBM

>>4314105
Thats true but thats not what I did for that video.

Like you said, I can do it that - do a direct video out from the camera to a capture card - which will give me a 29.97 fps 480i uncompressed file, which I then filter and deinterlace into 60fps progressive file (and then make mp4s or webms from it)

I can also the do the same thing BUT record to tape, and then feed a tape player video out to the capture card.. etc. Thats what's going on in that webm.

What you are seeing is a de-interlaced 60fps video, more closely to what "tape" video actually looked like. Tape CAN look good provided you have a decent quality tape/capture path. Throughout the 90s/00s however the only way to digitize tapes was to record them to DVDs at whatever shitty resolution the player gave you, locked in at 29fps interlaced footage.

>>4314064
what vhs camera has a 1/2" ccd? I would be interested in buying that

>>4314064
No.
LoFi > Looking unintentionally like shit. > Looking intentionally like actual shit from the anus.

>>4314118
Most cameras from the 80s I think. By the time VHS-C cameras came around they switched to 1/8" sensors

>>4314064
Broooooo. I got this big bitch and would love to not hassle with vhs tapes. I really like the look of the video it produces.

Can you recommend me a portable capture card, possibly with a screen? The ccd viewfinder is in b&w, so I can't confirm the white balance is properly set.

I have a vhs player + capture card + obs that I use to record my videos with, but a portable solution would be so much better.

File: 20240515_144639.jpg (1.43 MB, 3508x1800)

1.43 MB JPG

>>4314064
Oops. Forgot pic. Got this for 80 bucks at an auction. In the 90s these cameras were over 7k dollars new.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G998U1
Camera Software	G998U1UESAFXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	1800
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:15 14:46:39
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	XA8XLNF00SM
Image Height	1800
Brightness	0.4 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	320
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	6.70 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

File: file.png (4.91 MB, 2500x2500)

4.91 MB PNG

>>4314164
Nice, you got an SVHS tape and an SVCR too? hell yeah

i tried using one of those Ninja portable HD screens but it doesnt accept the lowest resolution of the camera input

>>4314154
>>4314164
Oh I thought you meant like a camcorder. That makes more sense, but I'm not willing to take a shoulder mount camera with me places

File: file.png (1.75 MB, 1200x900)

1.75 MB PNG

>>4314231
I do mean like a camcorder. These 80s panasonics have 1/2" CCD sensors which may actually be M43 sensor sized.
The smaller late 90s handheld ones are more portable but the sensor is smaller too

>>4314229
I have a svhs tape, but not player for it. If I realized I would have gotten one instead of my stinky normal vhs player.

My concern is that the video out is those older ports.

Oh yeah, the damn things weighs way too much. I can only shoulder it for like 10-15 mins at a time. You'd also look like a maniac filming at the post office with it.

>>4314236
you will need a special connector in order to get svideo direct output https://www.avsforum.com/threads/oddball-jvc-7-pin-y-c-to-standard-s-video.1442427/

>>4314071
>composite video
>raw
i hate to break it to you anon, but it is heavily processed, and not raw. for fucks sakes you even have a date overlay

>>4314277
Youre right, raw was the wrong word. What I shouldve said was that the image was a direct video output from the camera, as opposed to recording to a vhs tape then capturing the footage from the tape.
This removes the middleman step.

>>4314265
Fug.

Sovl.
HD video was a mistake

>>4314295
Early tube HD cameras are a marvel and have plenty of sovl. It's only when everything went CMOS that the soul was sucked out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW26YMe8iUQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbBuBRY3iJ8

>>4314461
>1035i
>upscaled

File: ge-vhscapture5.webm (1.98 MB, 630x478)

1.98 MB WEBM

>>4314109

File: InShot_20240517_151111542 (1).webm (1.68 MB, 640x480)

1.68 MB WEBM

Meant to take a picture

>>4314702
So good

File: 1000030868.webm (2.57 MB, 640x480)

2.57 MB WEBM

Comp cuz webm is a pain in the ass

These are really cool. It's disappointing no one wanted to hire you. How do you record directly to a capture card on these? I assume there is a cable for direct TV out, is someone making retrofit units to take SD cards that you plug in from the external out port?

File: eSxgNY6.jpg (2.76 MB, 4756x2688)

2.76 MB JPG

>>4314785
I already took mine

>>4314805
>>4314810
>>4314829
what camera is this?

>>4315778
First two are off a FinePix S5800 and last one is Pentax Optio Z10

>>4315034
Nice

>>4314236
> Oh yeah, the damn things weighs way too much. I can only shoulder it for like 10-15 mins at a time. You'd also look like a maniac filming at the post office with it.

pussy

>>4316091
I gotta work up to it. It may be a combo of weight + uncomfortable shoulder pad.

You don't understand the temptation I have to do a 1st amendment audit with a huge 90s TV broadcast like camera.

>>4314064
Do you sell these on ebay or something? I'd be interested

>>4315813
Thank you.

I have one but the battery is junk and the tape drive keeps chewing up my tapes. Did you battery work or did you have to diy a battery for it

>>4314935
2nd this question I’m interested as well in learning more. Best of luck OP I think it looks cool as fuck

>>4316223
Do I sell the ones I fix up? Not currently. I'd like to make a video service using multiple vhs cameras as kind of a home-movies-vibe but with a little extras kick
>>4317139
They still make brand new batteries for my cameras, they're about $35 each and can last 1-1.5 hours

>>4317648
>>4314935
its a complex process that involves the video-out jack on the camera to a VCR and a TBC, which is then connected to a USB/AV adaptor into the computer, where it is captured raw, around 28 GBs per hour.
Then you filter and clean the video, then run it through a deinterlacer and eventually down to an x264/x265 codect to your final mp4 which can then be shared on social media,websites,youtube like i did here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQoCyteuDck

unfortunately YT's processing make the video look worse than the original

>>4317861
>28 GBs/hr
Anon of Quality, you can get YT to encode at better quality by rendering vid in high res container
Sticking it in 4k gives higher bitrate for *final* encodes

>>4317869
The issue is that these videos are captured at 720x480 and deinterlaced to 480p. If you know an upscaler that can go from 480 to 4K im all ears but i think it would look just as bad if not worse than the "HQ 480" mode that youtube has now

>>4317870
DaVinci Resolve has several upscale options. I believe setting your timeline to 4k (could always export at lower res, say 1080) is one way of doing it automatically.

If you play around with encoding several test vids at different resolutions/bitrates and upload them to youtube to compare you will see the benefits of increased bitrate.
Check out some youtube upload bitrate/resolution test vids, some pretty good quality is possible.

File: witch.webm (2.34 MB, 882x594)

2.34 MB WEBM

>>4317877
Thanks man. I have that program actually but never use it, I'll see what it can do. if it can import 480p or even 720p video then thats a good start.

File: GE-airshow.webm (1.8 MB, 719x594)

1.8 MB WEBM

>>4319556

File: ZVILLE_VHS2.webm (1.65 MB, 591x450)

1.65 MB WEBM

>>4321098

Bones from Team sesh approves this bread

>>4314064
You bet, Zoomers eat up "nostalgia" for breakfast anything that's on tape or looks like it.
>>4314099
you absolutely can, popular among bands, skaters, b-roll for music videos, "retro" subjects like vintage cars, vintage clothing models. Americana, summer sports, gen z could be called the "nostalgic generation" lots of Dough to rake in, frankly.
>>4314236
You got to work out to hold these cameras, overhead extension or something, i use a 25lb dumbbell and hold it for as long as i can. i end up holding camcorders for 2-3 hours at a time with breaks every 30 min.(filming bands). By the third set any camera is heavy.
>>4314935
video av cables(red yellow white) or s-video, even Firewire (if you have software on old OS) or a combination on how you do your audio to computer or analog converter.
>>4317139
Look in the tape deck if the rubber roller next to the other silver rollers if it is moving up and down or the rod its on is snapped that will cause tape bite.Canon camcorders seem to have this problem a lot so i hear. sometimes its just loose and needs to be pushed back on. be careful obviously.

File: The_accordion,_Le_Prince,(...).gif (805 KB, 295x265)

805 KB GIF

The CCD trend is so lame, and will eventually be saturated by cheap bandwaggoning by even lamer "artists", eventually leading people to realise it's another cheap capitalisation of nostalgia

The transience of the post-modern cultural graveyard is so depressing, kind of ironic since CCD looks inherently depressing

File: 1656931856831.jpg (59 KB, 606x484)

59 KB JPG

OP, this is really cool! 90's nostalgia is hitting hard right now, so hopefully you can find some work with your investment. I really like this clip. >>4321098 It reminds me of going to air shows with my dad as a kid in the early 90's. He had a very expensive camcorder like yours and he loved recording events.

>>4314280
ew why did you admit that asshole was right in any way
You didn't say RAW video
You said "raw video" as in video directly off the camera and unedited
You had it right, that other guy is an autistic wrong faggot

File: Vhscam Sample.webm (2.85 MB, 720x480)

2.85 MB WEBM

>>4314064
I have a VHS camera, but instead of getting the raw CCD output I record to VHS and then capture it through a VCR capture card.

What's your setup to capture directly from the camcorder CCD to digital file? You keep a laptop or something in your backpack?

>I've been trying to market myself to zoomers who want the VHS effect but nobody is biting .
They don't know what VHS looks like. They think old CCD footage just looks like their snap/insta filters- They still want HQ Video and using a free garbage filter is easier than actually putting the effort in, but I'm with you.

File: PXL_20230814_135704886.jpg (120 KB, 1105x832)

120 KB JPG

>>4327249
The camera. Repair was as simple as new belts and a replacement battery, but unfortunately the lens is fogged up a bit, the coating is starting to come off. I wish I knew how to fix that but I might hunt for a new VHS camcorder on craigslist or something.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:

>>4327073
>>4327249
Your right about the "VHS filter" app. Ive seen it and i'll admit its CLOSE but not all the way there, but for zoomers its exactly what they want and its instant. They dont want to wait for me with a giant camera and tape and take 3-5 days to get them back theirvideo that they have to then send to their phones anyway

>>4327249
My camera has an adaptor that lets me send A/V out from a proprietary jack on the camera itself. If im in the field I'll have a laptop wth a USB capture device to get the video ripped right the computer.
Did you 3D a battery adaptor? whats going on there.

>>4327254
You'd have better luck if you provided CCD recording in addition to other recording, like all the stuff a traditional studio did (Wedding photos, social media management, etc) Without offering all that, solely offering "VHS style recording" is going to be a stretch when filters do it instantly and free.

The camera came with a lead battery that was (obviously) dead. What I did was take the case for that battery and cut it open, remove and toss the old cells, then I 3d printed a small bracket that accepts a harbor freight 12v drill battery (Most of these cameras will run off 12v input from a cigarette lighter), and soldered it into the original connectors of the OG battery housing. this way, I have a factory fit removable battery, and a replacement that is cheap and rechargeable- I throw 3 or 4 of them in my bag and I'm good to go, and they cost like 15 bucks. I can record a 2 hour tape on 3 batteries, they are much more energy dense than the OG Lead ones.

The battery: https://www.harborfreight.com/12v-lithium-ion-battery-with-charger-57763.html

I'm sure if you didn't want to go through the effort of building a 3d printed shitty bracket and all that effort you could just solder wires from a pigtail end 12v barrel jack directly to the HF battery and plug it into the power slot of the camera (Usually is covered by the battery so you can't have it plugged in and on battery at the same time.)

I can post more pictures if you want. If you wanted to make money, I might suggest repairing old CCD cameras this way.

Also, you can't use a USB to 12v barrel adapter cable and a portable power bank- When the record head starts it pulls too many amps and shuts off. Drill batteries do not have this problem.

File: file.png (126 KB, 640x410)

126 KB PNG

>>4327259
I dont know if normies even know what CCD is. how can I market myself other than saying "ill record your event on VHS for the authentic look"?

Damn thats genius man. I just bought a new battery off ebay but it was $35 and lasts about 80 minutes on a good day.
12V 2 Amp-hours
I like your idea better because you can get store-available batteries instead of having to seek them out elsewhere.

From what I've seen with the GE cameras I buy (i have 3 of them now) its usually the exact same problem of the gears seizing up when the tape is being loaded in. Its not an easy fix since the problem gears are linked to the whole transport.
If i were a brave man I'd venture into other brands but I know GE stuff (aside from that) works and I have extra peripherals here.

>>4327267
Yeah I think you'd only really get people interested if they were already looking to make a "Vintage" video for a specific reason (Larger youtube channel, etc) but it's just so easy using a shitty filter.

I lot lucky because my camera takes the battery externally- I know a lot of old VHS camcorders are based on a style where the battery slots in- that would have been way harder to do since obviously the drill battery won't fit. It looks like yours is the kind that slots in based on the pic of the battery. I know a lot of panasonics do this.

File: file.png (86 KB, 379x350)

86 KB PNG

How did he beat the system? He got 82K views in a month with only 400 followers, and I've been putting up VHS videos for months that barely scrape 100 views. Did the algorithm just decide on him instead of me?

>>4329675
Probably, that or he bought an ad

>>4329675
Nobody likes incels lmao

>>4314064
Zoomies want the experience, not the service.
They've grown up all their lives blasted with snoy tech bullshit that promises to change the world but doesn't make a fucking difference in how they feel that night
Then they see old tech from the 90s and early 2000s that barely works but gives them an opportunity to do dumb shit with friends and an aesthetic to match without marketing BS like over 9000 megapixels

These products had marketing originally too, but
1) the improvements those marketings promised actually significantly changed the capabilities of technology. Going from 5mp to 10mp to 16mp is huge. But after 20mp you start hitting diminishing returns hard, and past 24mp you don't get a meaningfully better image unless you're cropping heavily AND printing, rather than just sharing primarily through social media. And
2) the marketing is culturally disconnected. It's an artifact to them. To them it's not much different than a millennial or gen x being entertained by the differences in foreign tv, or how millennials appropriated hippie culture in their late teens and early 20s.

Not to mention, I think the purpose of products in the 90s and early 2000s were quite a bit different. Real consumer products existed back then.

So yeah, zoomies are looking for CCD cameras, a lot of them have looked into and discovered the subtle differences in the resulting image. But they don't want to fucking pay for that shit. The point isn't the resulting image, it's about the experience getting there.

>>4331385
Damn I should just quit now then

File: DSC_0006.jpg (1.43 MB, 3009x2000)

1.43 MB JPG

>>4331385
I enjoy the thought of zoomers buying up all the CCD cameras
They get to learn on older gear without all the nanny assists and massive dynamic range of modern cameras which in turn will make them better photographers in the long run

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D70
Camera Software	DxO PhotoLab 7.4
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	2190
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	202 mm
Serial Number	-1000216
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:02 11:03:41
Exposure Time	1/2000 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	2.24 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	135.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3009
Image Height	2000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
ISO Speed Used	200
Image Quality	FINE
White Balance	AUTO
Image Sharpening	MED.H
Focus Mode	AF-S
Flash Setting	NORMAL
Flash Compensation	0.0 EV
ISO Speed Requested	200
Flash Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
Tone Compensation	AUTO
Lens Type	Unknown
Lens Range	80.0 - 200.0 mm; f/2.8
Auto Focus	Single Area, Center Selected, Top Focused
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Color Mode	Landscape sRGB
Lighting Type	NATURAL
Noise Reduction	OFF
Camera Actuations	15516
Image Optimization	CUSTOM
Saturation 2	NORMAL

File: DSC_9345_d70_1.jpg (1000 KB, 3008x2000)

1000 KB JPG

>>4331789
How did you get a nice picture from the D70? I tried that and it just came out flat

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D70
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Camera Raw 12.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	770
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	150 dpi
Vertical Resolution	150 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:04 17:54:33
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/5.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/5.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: DSC_0005.jpg (877 KB, 3009x2000)

877 KB JPG

>>4331790
Just install Nikon Capture in a VM and make a custom curve :^D
https://archive.org/details/NikonCaptureVersion4.2.1NSA2005

Or just mess with the curves in your raw editor of choice lol

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D70
Camera Software	DxO PhotoLab 7.4
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	2190
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	202 mm
Serial Number	-1000216
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:02 10:58:35
Exposure Time	1/6400 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	1.68 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	135.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3009
Image Height	2000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
ISO Speed Used	200
Image Quality	FINE
White Balance	AUTO
Image Sharpening	MED.H
Focus Mode	AF-S
Flash Setting	NORMAL
Flash Compensation	0.0 EV
ISO Speed Requested	200
Flash Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
Tone Compensation	AUTO
Lens Type	Unknown
Lens Range	80.0 - 200.0 mm; f/2.8
Auto Focus	Single Area, Center Selected, Top Focused
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Color Mode	Landscape sRGB
Lighting Type	NATURAL
Noise Reduction	OFF
Camera Actuations	15515
Image Optimization	CUSTOM
Saturation 2	NORMAL

>>4331790
Also your pic looks nice? Wouldn't call it flat at all, probably just the lighting

>>4314064
Zoomer here
>I've been trying to market myself to zoomers who want the VHS effect but nobody is biting .
How about you stop trying to milk us with the least available effort and just go out there and make some art with your shit?

>>4332251
I have taken over 30 hours of VHS video since last summer dont worry

I'd say keep at it. Maybe the market will take off and if it won't you at least had some fun filming stuff and did not waste money on buying NFT's or something.

>>4314702
man, this is nice. What capture card are you using?

I have a hi8 camcorder that I would like to do this with. I'd just use tapes and digitize them later but unlike audio cassettes they don't make them anymore.

I also have a mini DVD camcorder that I want to try to get working again but it's not as cool as a tape camcorder, even if I don't end up using the tape.

>>4314935
>These are really cool. It's disappointing no one wanted to hire you
It's all about networking and marketing, I would assume. OP probably isn't enough of a vapid social media addict to make it in that milieu

>>4317139
you can get new batteries. video tape decks can be a bit of a nightmare to work on, hopefully it's just sticky rollers or something but I wouldn't mess with it unless you know VCR repair

>>4321098
>>4323977
Holy shit. this is so cool.

File: file.png (547 KB, 502x599)

547 KB PNG

>>4327214
>CCD looks inherently depressing

>>4331385
>Zoomies want the experience, not the service.
This would make sense. OP, if you're doing the taping yourself and then giving them a finished video, to them it's almost functionally the same as just using software to make it kind of look that way. Actually using it yourself is different entirely. I think you'd be better off:
>continue making your videos and offering the service anyway
>keep posting them
>use your knowledge to find and fix these cameras
>shill them and sell them to people

File: ge-fireworks.webm (2.4 MB, 464x359)

2.4 MB WEBM

>>4333270
the big reason for me offering the service is that the workflow is complex and will turn off zoomers from even bothering with it:
even if i gave one a camera and a blank tape they will still need: a vcr, a tv to watch it on (or an HDMI adaptor), or a USB capture card, capture software, deinterlacer software, video editing software. And you do allll of that and youre left with a MP4 file that still has to get copied to your iphone and then uploaded to social media

I mean i COULD rent out my cameras, let them shoot, and then digitize their stuff for them, at least then they can feel like they "did their own video", but I dont feel comfortable leaving my equipment unsupervised.

>>4333299
The same zoomers who would find that workflow too much are the same ones, I would assume, who, if they wanted that sort of video, would just slap a free shitty "filter" on it and call it a day. The ones who would enjoy that workflow would just do it themselves, I think.

There are probably ones who would enjoy the workflow if it were simplified and already set up for them. Cut out the tape middleman. They aren't making VHS tapes anymore anyway, so let's leave them to people who really want to work with tape. You could refurbish cameras by giving them a good cleaning and stuff, even ones with a broken tape transport (which also seems to be the main failure point). You can do the difficult work of setting it up with a capture card and stuff, and then you can see if there are people willing to buy your converted straight-to-digital-storage VHS camcorder. Then all they have to do is know how to work the camera and maybe plug the capture device into their computer or something.

Since you're already playing with the cameras try setting one up in a way that you could sell it as a standalone thing to someone and see if you actually get any buyers and go from there.

File: file.png (479 KB, 999x560)

479 KB PNG

>>4333352
I thought about that actually. They make these tiny capture screens for HD cameras that you can mount and its basically a screen with an HDD attached to it so you can live capture any video being fed into it.

The VHS cameras I have allow for direct composite video and audio out, HOWEVER these HD screens cannot capture the native resolution of the camcorder which I believe is 320x240interlaced. I tried using one of those video game upscalers (retrotink) which can take a 240i signal and upscale it to 480i. still no luck. This would be the ultimate portable method otherwise

The other option which is more cumbersome is taking a laptop with you and just running the camcorder video right into the USB capture card to the laptop. I've done this with success, however now you will have to go around with a camera and laptop tied into each other while youre shooting which can be awkward in public.
When youre doing it at home (ie tripod, or just shooing with some friend for fun) its a great solution. just have a 6-12' usb cable so you can move around the room and leave the laptop (hell or a desktop at that point) and just shoot until youre done.

You're still left with a massive AVI file that will need to be deinterlaced and shrunken down to a portable size, but hey, you dont need a Tape or a VCR anymore.

File: vlcsnap-2024-07-05-14h35m(...).png (597 KB, 720x540)

597 KB PNG

>>4333355
>HD screens cannot capture the native resolution
as in they fuck it up a bit, or they just won't accept the signal? If it's the former then some zooms will still buy it. I don't know if you'd be willing to sell it like that though, you seem like a guy who gives a shit and wouldn't want to build a half-assed thing like that.

>retrotink
>still no luck
why not? What happened?

I've used a composite capture card with a laptop at home. I made some home videos on christmas with a hi8 camera. But people shit on me when I mentioned it somewhere because apparently whatever capture card I was using wasn't good enough. It was a device like in link related (https://www.ebay.com/itm/355703224269), as you can see it's really cheap. I'm sure the people who flamed me were sort of right, but for me the results were adequate. Pic related is a screenshot from a video I took.

Also, I guess it's cheap because the capture card maybe doesn't have to do the heavy lifting, your computer hardware runs software. So maybe that's partially why it's far cheaper as a USB capture card compared to something that is a DVR all by itself complete with a screen.

I wonder if you could swap the laptop for something like a raspberry pi.

>>4333359
That capture USB looks fine to me, I use a hauppauge Live-2 that I got about 10 years ago. It captures at 720x480, when is fed into a program called amarectv. I tried using virtual dub for actual capturing but I couldnt figure it out. I then use a codec called Lagarithmic (LAGS) which is more-or-less a raw capture codec, so 1 hour video is around 26GB. I then run it through editing software to reduce the size etc, etc.

>they just won't accept the signal
This, the HD screen (atomos ninja v is what i was using) just didnt detect any input signal. I think it MAY have been because the upscaler could not make a 480p signal but thats speculation. i dont have any other line doublers to check that theory and they are expensive at it is

What you posted looks fine to me. compared to what i posted here >>4314071 it definitely has a Hi8 feel.

I do have an rpi. its a 3B+, not sure if the processor could handle it, even then i'd need an OS that could run the capture software. and some kind of tiny portable screen so you could see what youre doing.

>>4333369
I think your pi should be fine, a lot of this software seems like XP era stuff so if it could run on an older laptop then potentially similar software can work on a pi running linux. I'm not certain though. It could be worth a try,

bumpin
has anyone here used a DVD handycam before? How does the sensor output direct from the camera compare to hi8 cameras?

File: 1712368734850.webm (456 KB, 600x480)

456 KB WEBM

>>4314064
Spoopy.

>>4333352
>>4333299
I don't think most zoomers have the patience, I record on tape and convert the tape to digital via an analog to digital converter, from there i pass the recording off by cloud storage with link in email or unlisted YouTube for them to use a YouTube downloader to rip it. biggest gripe I have is re-recording because you have to replay the video in live time to convert it, and pray the tape or cam doesn't crap out. main selling point is, "you could use and app or editor but the effects are authentic and irreplaceable" . Most zoombies can't sit still for 2 hours watching a tape record let alone 7 seconds.I don't sell my tapes (to hard to find) Its a labor of love that's why I do it.

bumpin

>>4314071
That's very Jeanne Dielman

>>4337931
how so?

>>4314064
Last bump

File: ge-pd.webm (1.88 MB, 763x557)

1.88 MB WEBM

>>4345876
One thing CCD struggles which is sharpness, maybe it’s just the shitty lens on the camera but text always looks soft and out of focus to me

>>4345900
>mouse pointer moves across screen
Immersion broken

>>4345947
I had to screen capture the mp4 file to webm and I forgot to turn off the capture mouse option lel

>>4345969
nice

>>4314074
>zero exposure

oh, you mean you thought babies first reel would go viral and an audience would just flock to your brilliant creative talent without you actually putting any work in?

there are 200,000,000 other schlubs like you doing the same fucking thing.

>>4347983
>sends out a dozen (12) job applications
>doesn't hear back from any / gets automated rejection emails
Idk man, the marker is rigged must be

>>4314702
colour me stupid, but can't you achieve same thing with modern bigger sensor cameras and an After Effects FX?

File: ceaffe.jpg (145 KB, 1400x1050)

145 KB JPG

Fuck you all, I thought my old DSLR addiction was bad enuogh, now I'm looking at 40 year old camcorders that my noodle arms can barely hold.

just got a DVD handycam. Not as cool as a hi8 camcorder but I'll still play around with it

File: sonic2-1.webm (1.94 MB, 637x532)

1.94 MB WEBM

>>4349675
There's something unique about the CCD sensor and its size. There is an inherent "softness" to the image that comes from the sensor and possibly the lens too that doesnt really work on modern sensors.I suppose if you did a very soft blur effect on a modern video it might achieve something similar?

>>4351498
If you know how CCDs work there's an inherent 'rounding' effect that comes from the fact that each pixel is a 'bucket' which is basically filled up by light, and when it comes time to save the values to a file, only one column of buckets (usually the leftmost or rightmost) has a 'readout facility - each bucket is poured into the adjacent 'bucket' then read off in turn. So there is a sort of blurring/loss effect from that process.
Also there's no rolling shutter at all because it is literally like a grid of buckets that can all fill up simultaneously. However hard they try to disguise it on CMOS it's still there and it's obnoxious.
There's probably something else in play but what that is is hard to determine

>>4351522
This is actually really cool info thanks anon

>>4351522
Nah, global shutters on CMOS sensors is nothing new. They've been around for a while. The trick is, they have a small bit of memory next to every photodiode so everything can be exposed at once, stored to memory, and the circuitry can take its time to read it out.
But the problem has always been that the memory, and particularly the supporting circuitry and shading structure for the memory (hint: the memory is essentially a second diode which is sensitive to light), has made it hard to get small enough pixel size to make it practical for consumer cameras -- it's largely been a technology reserved for industrial cameras where distortion-free images is more important than high resolution images. E.g. inspecting for flaws in an LCD's color filter as it comes out of a production machine at a high rate.

What Sony's done with the new global shutter is basically figured out how to put the memory into a BSI sensor in a way that still protects the memory from light, which allowed them to shrink pixels sufficiently to put them into consumer cameras.

>>4345969
>>4351498
I know you were looking to do actual a/v with the setup anon but if you take these crt tv videos with sonic or other 90s games and intersperse the tv flipping to channel 2-3 with the blue screen or fuzz and maybe some vintage ads and some decent audio work you could probably make a 10-15min ty vid of "pov you got home from school in 1994" or whatever and that'd pop off and be viral. if you can really stack up the footage you could make one of those ten hour videos too (even if it loops or has long periods where the TV is just time counting up/static/whatever) for the nostalgia nerds to watch while they sleep

>>4355759
Thats not a bad idea. Originally the idea was to piece together the whole game as a 1-2hr video and call it POV: watching your brother play sonic because you were too young" or something.
not sure exactly how your idea would work.
i have 3 inputs on this tv, one is for the game console,
one could be for a VCR playing old tv shows on a loop.
the third could be a signal out from my laptop with a fullscreen of a site that shows old commercials streams
Could be a lot of fun but the fact i have to think so hard about what to do to go viral makes me think im not cut out for this

I just got a new battery for my DVD camcorder in the mail and it seems to work fine. Can anyone recommend any specific DVD-RW discs?

>>4359024
Don't ever use RW discs. Rewriteable DVDs have and always will suck. Just use one time use discs and buy a 50 pack of whatever from wherever is cheapest.

>>4359354
>Don't ever use RW discs. Rewriteable DVDs have and always will suck.
how badly? I actually just got a couple in the mail, lol. They seem to work fine (for now), and I'll be using them as temporary storage before I save them to my computer. I don't care about their long-term stability.

>>4359749
RW discs work by using a dye that darkens when the laser writes it. This dye is unstable over long durations and the discs can only go through so many write cycles before needing to be replaced. Back in the day they advertised they could be rewritten like 1000 times, but that's when DVDs were the hot shit and not made as cheaply as possible in Chinese factories using old secondhand tools. I've had them fail after 10 rewrites.

Good thread

Just the thread I'm looking for, I don't know anything about photo/video and am not from this board, besides film are these types of cameras they best to capture the 80s/90s/early 2000s look? What are the best options?

>>4370174
you just named 3 fucking decades and 2 different mediums pick one because ill tell you different shit depending on the one.
you want 90s/early 2000s video, get a dvd-rw camcorder.
you want early 2000s photo, get a ccd cam.
you want 80s/90s photo, use film (preferably slide film)
you want 80s video, get a vhs camcorder

>>4314064
You are being stupid. VHS never looks “great”, and your shitty old sensor isn’t going to help the problems inherent in the format. A crappy lossy compressed 8th gen analog 240p image blown up & deinterlaced & analog multiplexed 5 times, recompressed, intended for a crt and caputured by a fucking cmos or ccd looks equally like the shit smear in my 2yo’s shorts. The only hope the world has of seeing its history for the 20 years after film gave way to video in 1980 is if Ai can analyze & deepfake old vhs content and reconstruct the characters, sets and scenes based on 35mm photographs of the time. All this shit is in the mean time is capitalism making everything cheaper, shittier, and all around worse until the pinko socialists at DARPA & NASA started licensing out the digital imaging tech they’d been developing for 25years to private companies to cash in on it.

>>4370374
Was it possible to get quality like this in non obscure formats?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fT4lDU-QLUY&pp=ygUPaGQgdmhzIG5ldyB5b3Jr

>>4370402
Canon is now selling an FF camera with APS-C dynamic range for $4500

>>4370903
Keep it up and they'll be celling a C series with VHS DR any day now. Salary man go brrrrr.

>>4370894
>that one guy caught looking at a fine broad at 1:00
Kek

>>4370894
pony tail man

>>4323977
Camera reveal??

>>4378549
Its a GE vhs camera from the 80s

>>4314064
I will never understand how anyone buying a camera that does video was ever convinced to go from global shutter (like this) to rolling shutter.

Imagine a device designed to capture motion, being bad at capturing motion! Nearly every video camera is like that now, and will be completely obsolete and not missed once global shutter takes over again.

>>4351498
More important is that fact the entire image is taken at the same time (global shutter), therefore handheld camera shake still looks good, especially at the high refresh rate.