Or any Film-like mirrorless...I am interested in obtaining that Film-like photos straight from the camera.I know Ricoh is very populat these days.. bu can it get those film shots... noAny other suggestion from the second hand market is welcome.. maybe Fujifilm XS10?I don't know why Ricoh is so expensive..
>>4327920X pro 3, fuck fixed lens cameras
If you want sooc jpegs looking like film there's nothing beating any Fuji and every new Fuji beats older models due to new sims/settings.
>>4327933OP here. So, you are telling me that I am better off with a used X-T3/4 rather than the Ricoh, right?
>>4327923bigger than a z6lol
>>4327935yes. the ricoh is terrible. I sent mine back after 2 days. it's a fucking meme perpetuated by homosexual youtube streetshitters
what about X-E3.. I see that they are quite cheap.
>>4327933You can achieve any simulation in post, retard
>>4327973OP doesn't want post retard.
>>4327920>wants FILMLIKE images>doesn’t just shoot filmRetard alert
>>4327990OP is tired of shooting just film, retard
>>4327923This. At least you aren’t stuck with soft foolji lenses and can go third party
>>4327992Op does not want post processing, yet xe’s primary criterion to start the thread was a camera that best applies post processing filters to jpeg output.Curious.
>>4328001SOOC...
Why are zoomers so fucking obsession with le film le lofi
>>4328003They’ve grown up in a world where the grotesque is presented and force fed to them as aesthetic beauty. They latch onto these things from the past with a misguided hope that this might bring them to a place before what they know, away from the garish reality of their present to the beauty of before. You have to feels bad for them a little. Their world has been ruined through no making of their own really.
Foolji looks nothing like filmTake your $2000. Buy a $50 film camera and $1950 in film. >>4328002SOOC is a marketing scam>buy the camera for the lookDeveloped film = strip of raw filesShoot film
>>4328011You'll have to keep spending $50 for film cameras as they break after 2 rolls of film.
>>4328012And your $2000 foolji scam breaks after seeing rain once
>>4328003Just like millennial kids romanticized the eighties in the ‘10s and ‘00s, and Genx romanticized the late sixties & seventies in the 90s, and the boomers romanticized the early sixties and fifties in the 80s, in every generation of kids a majority don’t get to bang the prom queen or fall ass first into money without having to earn it, so they feel the present is not working out for them, and that makes them prime candidates to get caught in the crossfire of the slightly older generations laziest marketers selling its youth back to itself in sad middle age, mired in the disappointment of finally realizing adulthood really fucking sucks and no one has a future worth looking forward to.Longest fucking sentence I ever felt like leaving as a run-on.Also, slide film is just kinda neat, bc you’re actually making something physical, sane as the diff between actually having sex w some smelly bumpy annoying human and jerking off to a perfect pristine video of a flawless model. The former is still preferable to most young people bc it’s a real experience vs a simulation.
>>4328016A digital photo is real>but metaphysically-Computation is based on material states. Everything is just nano-mechanical. It’s real. People are ignorant of this because it highlights how stupid “IP laws” are>i cant make a copy of my physical property and share it with a friend for free?>no, people who make this type of property are special to the government and get extra money by law. >that’s unfair isnt it?
>>4328026Nta but You damn well know and understand that “real” in this sense refers to tangible, you semantic schizo
>>4328028Computers are tangible, a digital print far more tangible than most negatives (ooooh, inverted colors with an orange mask, i can totally tell whats in the picture)Shoot film for reasons that matter not this autism>>4327920For the price of a fuji x-t4 ($1000) and a lens ($500), you can buy:Literally any nice film camera: $25 to $100100 rolls (3600) exposures of mixed color and B&W film stocks: $1400And unlike fuji it will actually look like film (and despite not being "weather sealed" not instantly and permanently die if it sees water, leaving you out $500 in repairs, fuji weather sealing doesnt work)
>>4328031I make 3600 good quality pictures in a single holiday
>>4328040Holy shit dude take your camera off continuous high
>>4328011digital can easily look like film lmao
>>4328043fuji sure cant. foveon can get closebayer already struggles and fuji xtrans is 2/3s as real as bayer. 24mp in bayer is really 8mp worth seeing. fujifags are putting up with 40mp to sorta equal that.
>>4328031There are no “reasons that matter” for shooting film you mongoloid, anything that “matters” is done better and more efficiently with digital. I shoot film myself but it’s delusion and cope to think it’s anything but an inefficient fun hobby
>>4328047Lets see, film:Is totally immune to moire and other false color/false detail issues native to CFAs and interpolationLooks more detailed than a 50mp MILC despite technically having less resolutionHas a limited color gamut which most people consider more aesthetically pleasing and painterly/artistic than your canonikonCan outresolve a $8000 fuji gfx with a 35mm rectangle if shooting black and white iso 10 film
>>4328047Digital does not and can not look like film doughever
>>4328067It will when you use photo editing software
>>4328068But no, it really won'tI've seen some people get very close but they were using 100mp medium format cameras and sophisticated, illuminant specific color profiles, not a one size fits all lightroom preset
>>4328069good thing gfx100s prices are going through the floor and soon they will be $2kif you can afford an x-t5 and 3 lenses you can afford a gfx100s and 1 prime and you will be a much better photographer for it
>>4328067This is cope for people who spent 500€ on 45 year old film camera only for it to die after 3 rolls of film.
>>4328076good film cameras dont break. sorry about your olympus, leica, canon or other such junk.
>>4328079This is plain ignorance of someone who hasn't held a film camera in his short life.
What about Canon G7x ii or iiihttps://youtu.be/Vk9PsOGLnvs?si=G8NssxbPZLLY9ZRS
>>4327920>Film-like photosjfc just use a fucking "film filter" app on your phone then. None of these cameras take film-like photos, the cameras simply have that aesthetic on the outside. What a pathetic retarded obsession.
>>4328115just add grain and shift the colors a little and you got film aesthetic. fucking fuji marketing department is genius at milking millennial retards and zoomer faggots
>>4328093$200, now $700+. What is the cheapest commonly available digishit that I can vacuum up and then make a Youtube video for more than 3x returns after a year?
>>4327920film-like in what way? film can look many different ways
>>4328222In this way:https://youtu.be/AlNQEiqXybEhttps://fujixweekly.com/2022/11/27/1970s-summer-fujifilm-x-t5-x-trans-v-film-simulation-recipe/
>>4328286Ah, you mean looks like expired film on a bad camera, gotcha. Well if you get a Fuji you got the bad camera part down, at least.Why do zoomers think that film was only ever lofi, full of defects and faults, with shit colours and bad focus? Who gave them that idea? It’s amusing that they also look a lot like the “CCD HACK” type of images they seem to cream themselves over as well. If that’s the case just add a bad colour cast and reduce clarity lol
>>4327920OP look - I have a Ricoh GRIII and I used it for about 2 years. Kept it out of my pockets and around my neck. When not in use it was stored in a hard shell case in a climate controlled environment. Doing all of this was for nothing, it still got a huge hair of dust inside that I cannot remove. Avoid the GRIII don't fall for the hype, you have to baby the fuck out of it and it will still get debris inside the lens. Wait until they release a weather sealed GR and rethink. Seriously I am not memeing or trying to be funny - as soon as I can make it back to the shop I am selling this pos.
>>4327940I've seen a dude by the name sage posting this pic, it's a very nice pocket size camera and much cheaper than fuji. and the simulations you can do them in Lightroom.
>>4328286if film looked like this I would demand my money back from the guy who sold me that roll of film
>>4328003They grew up with social media, and the big influencers and big players on social media are usually sharp professional photos. The lofi grainy nostalgic image is a route to get the fuck away from the world that’s only getting more shit for the zoomers, let alone the absolute state of the generation before them, the millienials.
>>4328031>fuji weather sealing doesnt workHow so?
>>4328638too bad you lose the camera rather sooner than later due to dust.
OP hereSeems like I might end up buying X-T5 + Fujifilm 35mm F2 R WR XF lenses.
