[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 3767.jpg (434 KB, 1506x1004)
434 KB
434 KB JPG
didn't we use to have an aircrafts general thread? anyway here it is revived
photos from the faggotville air show last weekend. weather was objectively shit. no good position on the flight line to be had either
>>
File: 4276.jpg (412 KB, 1506x1004)
412 KB
412 KB JPG
chink trainer plane and a biplane stunt machine
>>
File: 4349.jpg (439 KB, 1506x1004)
439 KB
439 KB JPG
RCAF SAR chopper
>>
File: 4501.jpg (464 KB, 1506x1004)
464 KB
464 KB JPG
CF-188 "mass attack"
>>
File: 4539.jpg (450 KB, 1506x1004)
450 KB
450 KB JPG
I bailed as these were landing. missed the F-35 demo at the end of the show. oh well, it was raining pretty badly by then
>>
>>4331005
Hold on, they've got fake canopies painted on the undersides? That's pretty cool. I figured that was made up for anime plane games.
>>
>>4331014
>they've got fake canopies painted on the undersides?
correct, all CF-188s have that feature
>>
File: 4386.jpg (489 KB, 1506x1004)
489 KB
489 KB JPG
stunt plane. probably my best panning shot from the show.
ISO 100
f8
1/125s
>>
>>4331023
Niiiiiiiice, that looks really sharp. Too bad the weather looks like shit
>>
File: DSCF5653.jpg (1.69 MB, 2160x1440)
1.69 MB
1.69 MB JPG
F-35

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-H1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.4 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.4
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)345 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:07:01 00:14:37
Exposure Time1/4000 sec
F-Numberf/6.7
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/6.7
Brightness9.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length230.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: IMG_20240710_182944952.jpg (2.71 MB, 4096x3072)
2.71 MB
2.71 MB JPG
I'm airport ops. I'm a fucking moron with no idea how to take good photos and my Thinkphone takes ass pics from a distance.

I will contribute if I get gear recommendations for a first timer at photography with a $3-400 budget, since I have access to everywhere other than stuff that will put me in danger or active runways. There's a lot of things I see with my two eyes that look fucking cool but my phone cannot capture without looking completely underwhelming
>>
>>4335484
Used D3400 (or D5x00/D7x00) + kit telephoto zoom lens (get the one with VR if you feel like spending a bit more, it's worth it)
>>
>>4335572
How important is a telephoto lens? I was gonna do this >>4335593 but I'm now realizing from reading that the R50 is a great body with expensive lenses. I'm not scared to buy used...but mind you that's $600 for a refurb R50 just not sure if the 18-45mm lens gonna be enough.

I can set myself 5-700 feet from centerline of most runways here I would love to take a few pictures of planes on touchdown. It's a major airport so I'll get to photo 747/777/A380s.

The dual lens Nikon is uncommon, when I find them they're like $600-800
>>
>>4335633
EF adapter for $60. EFS 55-250 IS STM for $350 new, $150 used. Sure it's old glass and not the best telephoto but you want a budget option, there us ho



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.