File: WTC.jpg (3.07 MB, 2000x1883)

3.07 MB JPG

Remember without a photo you're a bitter sensorlet.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 25.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2000
Image Height	1883
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:02 17:28:43
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2000
Image Height	1883
Scene Capture Type	Standard

gear doesn't matter

>>4331865
Sorry you don't qualify, sport.

File: 20240702_173020.jpg (1.09 MB, 2754x3062)

1.09 MB JPG

>>4331860
I wonder how slow this thread will be. I've considered making either an alternative process thread, or a large format thread. I know it would most likely be only me posting in them. :(

Here is a god tier medium format camera. 6x9, wide angle, ground glass or zone focused. The graflex xlsw.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	Galaxy S24 Ultra
Camera Software	S928U1UEU1AXCB
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	115 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	3000
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:07:02 17:30:20
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/3.4
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Unique Image ID	H50XSQE00YM
Image Height	3000
Brightness	3.2 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	83/5000 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/3.4
ISO Speed Rating	200
Image Width	4000
Digital Zoom Ratio	23.5
Focal Length	18.60 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4331860
What’s a good camera for someone looking to adopt the format that already has experience with film? I really like the Fuji GX680.

>>4331977
Pentax or Mamiya 645

File: IMG_1975.jpg (1.46 MB, 1284x1456)

1.46 MB JPG

>>4331977
The gx680 is a beast I love mine. The lenses are fantastic. But I would recommend it as a first medium format. Get something small and light that you’ll want to take with you like a rolleifkex or something. Picrel mk.i I recently got working again (came as a parts cam with my mk iii).

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	216 dpi
Vertical Resolution	216 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1284
Image Height	1456

>>4331981
Meant “would NOT” recommend. Maybe something like one of the rangefinders too, or the af 645s

>>4331977
Right here >>4331966 keep an eye on ebay for a cheaper one, and get a horseman 23 6x9 back for it.

File: rbcarry.jpg (412 KB, 2040x1536)

412 KB JPG

>DYEL

Why yes I do.

File: IMG_20190413_172058.jpg (2.51 MB, 2736x3648)

2.51 MB JPG

I loved my RZ67. 110mm was an absolute monster of a lens.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	HUAWEI
Camera Model	CLT-L29
Camera Software	CLT-L29 9.0.0.203(C432E5R1P9)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2736
Image Height	3648
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Image Orientation	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2019:04:13 17:20:58
Exposure Time	711/500000 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	3.95 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2736
Image Height	3648
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

Poser cameras

lol chads can only post gear pics?

Does 6x7 really have any benefit over 645 other than grain peeping 100mp scans?
>so many more blades of grass i can see
>That's just a bunch of dots
>no, it's a blade of grass

>>4332146
holy fucking cringe. Just imagine this fat retard waddling around with his camera aggressively trying to project an air of being nonchalant while he so obviously and desperately wants you to think he's cool and ask him about his camera.

>>4332286
A different look. Just like all other fipmy types and formats.

>>4332289
A different look at what enlargement factor and film speed

Like 400 speed 35mm is clean and smooth as a 4x6 and doesn't really look different from mf unless there's an insane DOF/lens quality difference (less likely ages ago, but these days you can actually shoot 35mm film with sharp-wide-open lenses, thanks canon ef mount!)

>>4332316
All of them. Bigger film = finer tonality

>>4332317
Prove it with photo

The V-system is the pinnacle system of MF. I have tried many others but nothing comes close. Film backs, perfect lens, great handling, rock solid, no electronics. I have shot (and own) many others but this is my favorite. My second would be Pentax 67

>>4332319
No one has to prove anything to you. You’re 100% allowed to believe 35mm and 67 look the same.

>>4332331
>Is 6x7 that much better than 645, not just in excessive enlargements
>yes, if, in theory
>Prove it, post photos
>uhhhhhh fuck you
645 it is then

>>4332316
You don't need to compare pictures to prove it.

If you take a 35mm image and enlarge it to 8x10 and do the same for the exact same image but on 6x7 film one will have much smaller grain that produces a higher tonal resolution at the very least. Same exact film emulsion.

Enlargement factor really doesn't matter because practically speaking we normally print to standard sizes like 8x10,11x14, etc. I don't think most people decide to make a print and say they want a 12x enlargement factor. They choose a size to print at.

>>4332287
I'd love to talk to a fat retard about his old camera

>>4331981
canadian?
also bloody hell are those plastic gears?

>>4332337
Ok, prove that 6x7 enlarges to 8x10 and 11x14 noticeably better than 645.

>>4332340
Yeah, what about that picture points to that though lol
>plastic gear
Yes, it is, but I’m not worried about them, they seem well made, big and chunky injection moulded things. Still, metal would have been nicer.

>>4332342
6x4.5 = 27
6x7= 42
42/27= 1.56

67 is 1.56 times larger than 645. If the image is the exact same you will have 1.56x more resolution/tonal definition.

Your brain is in gearfag/digicuck mode, my guy. Stop it. I said they have different looks and larger film sizes have finer tonality when printed to the same size as a smaller format. Nothing about either of them being innately better just a different look.

Sometimes a super grainy, high enlargement factor 35mm shot is a better look than the same image with a zero grain 8x10 sheet film contact print!

>>4331981
>just buy a japshit camera bro

>>4332333
Literally no one cares what you do anon

>big camera
>film processed by a studio
>scanned with shitty CCD sensor scanner
>compressed when uploaded online

you must be retarded to use this shit

>>4332346
>Yeah, what about that picture points to that though lol
the english-french can of peace tea or whatever that is. one only ever finds that in canada because the qfficial languages act is gay.
>well made, big and chunky injection moulded things
there's that then, although the plastification of moving parts started already with the nikon F

>>4332355
Shooting film is only complete when you make silver gelatin prints with it. Digitizing film is nothing more than an inferior digital archive of your photograph.

>>4332350
I am prepared to accept your argument if you can produce a non Japanese camera with equivalent spec to the gx680z no, not close, equivalent. Go on.

File: DSCF3500.jpg (3.13 MB, 4000x3000)

3.13 MB JPG

i gotta 50r which i most likely will sell for a film camera. it's just as slow and big as an analog mf camera i think, but more expensive and doesn't look nearly as good

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	GFX 50R
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.36
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	40 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:12:22 02:57:58
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	640
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Brightness	1.6 EV
Exposure Bias	-2 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4000
Image Height	3000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Blur Status	OK
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Auto Exposure Status	OK
Flash Mode	Unknown
Focus Mode	Auto
Focus Status	OK
Picture Mode	Aperture Prior AE
Sharpness	Normal
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
White Balance	Auto

talk me out of buying a Poontax 645z please.

>>4332429
They’re gay. Get a 645N for a fraction of the price. >>4332349
>>4332346
>>4332342
>>4332333
>>4332286
I have both a 645 and 67. For scans they look 99% similar. There may be nuanced differences but nothing major.

>>4332448
Thank you for a real answer goddamn

I like human perspective more than "in pfeory the tonality would be ditherent"

>>4332464
You aren't going to ask him for examples?

>>4332466
No his answer sounds honest instead of gearfaggy so i dont care, it's what i want to hear and what i'm used to seeing on flickr, probably even less of a big deal because i prefer the 6x6 camera selection to the 6x7 one, but if he wants to post examples go ahead

File: GOR3.jpg (1.59 MB, 2011x3000)

1.59 MB JPG

Can't wait for the weather to get better in Australia, had my 6x9 collecting dust on my shelf for months before I took it out for this shoot and it's been collecting dust again for months since then

File: R6-15-6-24-494-positivem.jpg (3.76 MB, 3000x2250)

3.76 MB JPG

>>4332477
>Can't wait for the weather to get better in Australia
tfw, this is the last image I got before it started pissing down continuously and then I vaporised a kangaroo with pic related so now I have to use every slither of sunlight to patch this shitbox up.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:04 12:40:18
Flash	No Flash
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: DSCF5904c.jpg (991 KB, 2400x1800)

991 KB JPG

repost from /fag/
atm this seems like a meh thread idea

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	GFX 50R
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.38
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	51 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:19 02:50:36
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	250
Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Brightness	2.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	65.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2400
Image Height	1800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Blur Status	OK
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Auto Exposure Status	OK
Flash Mode	Unknown
Focus Mode	Manual
Focus Status	OK
Picture Mode	Aperture Prior AE
Sharpness	Normal
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
White Balance	Auto

>>4332548
>atm this seems like a meh thread idea
That’s cause when you scan it and present it on a screen really what’s the difference between digital MF and 135, unless you’re using really special glass not much. And that’s the black pill people don’t want to accept. So then, this just turns into another weird gear fag snapshit thread

File: DSCF4404.jpg (2.25 MB, 4000x3000)

2.25 MB JPG

>>4332552
probably the best case for the thread is people learning and sharing information about mf camera experiences. as always with threads based on particular strains of gear

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	GFX 50R
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.36
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	40 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:01:09 00:09:02
Exposure Time	13 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Brightness	-7.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4000
Image Height	3000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Blur Status	Blur Warning
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Auto Exposure Status	OK
Flash Mode	Unknown
Focus Mode	Manual
Focus Status	OK
Picture Mode	Manual Exposure
Sharpness	Normal
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
White Balance	Auto

>>4331860
isn't fullframe medium format, since ff backs were called mf?

>>4332574
Full frame refers to 35mm film. It's probably called a MF back because it fits on a MF camera to replace the standard 120 film back.

>>4332468
>no because he told me what I wanted to hear

File: Stereotyped+complete+into(...).jpg (190 KB, 900x1225)

190 KB JPG

>>4332574
>>4332576
there was no full frame until digital, it's just a buzzword since producing the first consumer sensor similar in size to 135 was a big deal, it literally means "the whole 35mm nigger". 35mm film is "standard" and is a family of formats, e.g. cut in half you get APS, 16mm and super 16, uncut its 135, a myriad of panoramic formats and super 35. medium format comes from the film being somewhere between standard 35 derivatives and large format sheet films, simple as.

>>4332601
Unironically

File: 1000037793.jpg (2.22 MB, 2783x3710)

2.22 MB JPG

Another sold gear pic

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G781B
Camera Software	G781BXXS7HWF3
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	3024
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2023:08:20 12:18:02
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4032
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	X12QSND00YM
Image Height	3024
Brightness	7.5 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	3/2500 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	40
Image Width	4032
Focal Length	5.40 mm
Metering Mode	Spot
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4332754
>3.5
do MFtrannies really

>>4332776
You can get down to like 2.2f. He’s just a fag with a shit camera

File: Photo03_3.jpg (2.71 MB, 1500x1494)

2.71 MB JPG

>>4332776
umm akually bcuz of teh crop fact0r of 0.43 its rly an F1.5 equivalent

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2910
Image Height	2898
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2024:07:04 22:29:59
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1500
Image Height	1494

>>4332793
Show us the 2.2F 6x9 camera anon

File: IMG_6273 - Copy.jpg (262 KB, 1000x750)

262 KB JPG

Have a bunch of 120 Provia 100F E-6 film, should I buy the Cinestill e-6 kit? i regularly use the c-41 for when i'm doing color, just looking at getting into slides.

The rolls would go through a 6x9, 6x6, and 6x4.5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: 37600.jpg (3.17 MB, 4032x3024)

3.17 MB JPG

>>4332776
Yes

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-G781B
Camera Software	G781BXXU3CUG2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2021:08:01 16:42:16
Exposure Time	1/177 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	40
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	13.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	5.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	X12QSND00YM

File: IMG_6273 - Copy Copy.jpg (299 KB, 1000x750)

299 KB JPG

>>4332811
nice AI slop, post your real setup

>>4332813
>SM-G781B
holy bubbles bokah

File: 2024-07-04-0005.jpg (3.17 MB, 2345x2345)

3.17 MB JPG

I like TLRs and you should too.
picrel yashica D.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	9000F
Camera Software	VueScan 9 x64 (9.8.32)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top

What's your medium format scanner setup? I've heard doing it with a macro lens is acceptable but it seems I'll also need a light source and a film holder, and may need to do image stitching to get decent resolution. Is it really worth the hassle vs a dedicated scanner?

>>4332865
I’m using an actual scanner, canoscan9000f ii. I haven’t bought/printed/etc a holder for 120 yet so using my camera scanning setup is a bit of a pain with it. >>4332862 from the scanner. I’m happy enough with the results, but it’s a much clunkier process truth be told. If your medium format fits 3:2 well, then you could technically fit it in one shot but you’d be giving up magnification. But honestly if you’re just posting here and like Instagram or whatever, it’s decent enough. You could pass a whole roll through at single shot and if you see something you really like, go back and stitch it 1:1. The workflows are much nicer than using a dedicated scanner anyway imo.

>>4332870
>The workflows are much nicer than using a dedicated scanner anyway imo.
Damn for real? Even stitching and everything is still nicer?

>>4332873
I think so, because it’s much easier to just take a shot and move to the next one with a camera. Scanners are slow and you can only do like 3 frames at a time on mine and it takes a few minutes per frame at even a lower dpi. And the software I need to use vuescan works but it’s janky. Using my camera scanning setup it’s as simple as snap, advance neg, snap, advance neg, etc. I can do a full 35mm roll in like a minute with the camera.

File: unh.jpg (448 KB, 1094x1458)

448 KB JPG

>>4332853
what a strange post.
>>4332865
Canoscan 9000F MKII + Vuescan. For color everything the dust removal is top tier, for B/W the IR camera doesnt play well with silver so you have to manually delete dust, though i guess that would be the case with DSLR scanning too. It even has a bed lock for when you are moving it around to prevent damage.

I suggest finding a NIB one from eBay that hasn't been over worked, I bought mine new in like 2014 and it hasn't given me any troubles.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4332979
cabinet o' cringe

>>4332984
you should see my other cabinets!

>>4332988
Show me.

File: photo_2024-07-05_16-43-41-2.jpg (199 KB, 500x500)

199 KB JPG

Points to whoever can guess how rare this model is. No I will not be providing a higher res image.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:05 16:46:35
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: photo_2024-07-05_16-57-53.jpg (44 KB, 500x500)

44 KB JPG

>>4333017
Photo for entry.

>>4332340
>are those plastic gears?
>>4332346
>metal would have been nicer
Solid plastic is better than Sony's bullshit of putting a plastic tooth ring over a brass hub, causing the outer ring to break when it offgasses and shrinks.

>>4332425
>i gotta 50r which i most likely will sell
How much?

>>4332542
>I vaporised a kangaroo with pic related
Did you take its head as a trophy?

>>4333018
>>4333020
>>4333022
>>4333026
nice one luke
>>4333033
what part about vaporised don't you understand? cunt turned into red mist

>>4332574
>since ff backs were called mf?
"Full frame" is relative.
24x36mm digital backs weren't full frame because they didn't fill the frame of the cameras they were mounted on (with the exception of the Horseman Digiflex (which was a 35mm camera)).
By that logic, APS-H cameras are medium format too because the DCS 465 exists.

File: Giraffe_Pole_Fellatio.webm (1.95 MB, 480x768)

1.95 MB WEBM

>>4332605
>pic

File: 4adjuv.jpg (25 KB, 630x396)

25 KB JPG

>>4333035
I royally fucked up, never putting my name in metadata again. Thanks for maintaining my anonymity.

>>4333017
Rolleiflex 2.8E3?
2,025 made

Xenotar lenses on the Rollei's are incredible

>>4333095
Nice one. How it's less expensive than the 2.8F will remain a mystery to me.

>>4333097
You never know, if you hold onto that 2.8E3 for long enough it'll be worth way more than any 2.8F
except maybe those weird ass gold arum ones

File: PSX_20210814_181644.jpg (1.93 MB, 2500x1566)

1.93 MB JPG

I hate scanning 120 so my bronica has just been on pano duty the last few years. 135 > 120 bitches

>>4333102
Pretty fuckin kino. But include an actual scan if you're posting 35 to a 120 thread.

If I like shooting 67 what’s a good digital system to get into?

>>4332576
Yeah, I am kind of joking. The name is well established these days.

>>4333102
Sounds a bit homo to me

File: Image 95 (2).jpg (3.81 MB, 2809x3781)

3.81 MB JPG

65mm 250D, 6x7

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	7025
Image Height	9455
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:03:30 08:10:57
Color Space Information	sRGB
Light Source	Unknown

so is 6x9 medium format or large format.

>>4333443
Medium

>>4333360
bruh, get a squeegee it absolutely obliterates those water marks and spots

>>4333492
I hate squeegee, and find that photo-flo + adequate drying time works perfectly fine, especially if you leave a bit of extra film at the bottom for the water to collect on.
I may not have done a photoflo rinse because my 65mm back needed a clean and lubrication. I was happy to have gotten this one picture from the whole strip.

>>4333498
lol, I just pull it straight out of the stabiliser, run the squeegee down 2-3 times and never have an issue. also reduces amount of dust since both stab and photo-flow get super sticky as they dry and anything that lands on the film is there forever, the squeegee dries it enough that any dust can be brushed or blown off when scanning.

>>4333501
Squeegee is jusy another chance of me scratching emulsion, sadly. If you want fast drying try using a space heater with a fan. Works great for sheet film and somehow no water streaks!

File: par121453-teaser-story-big.jpg (227 KB, 1280x849)

227 KB JPG

>>4333513
Wasn't that how Robert Capa's D-Day negatives were ruined?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)
Photographer	Photographs by Robert Capa © 2001 by Cornell Capa
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5344
Image Height	3543
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2015:11:06 17:51:31
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	5344
Image Height	3543

>>4333515
No clue. Maybe older films are more sensitive to it, but I've never run into any issues when I've done it like 100 times. I don't know exactly how hot my fan is, but I keep the film moving and it only gets warm to the touch.

>>4333515
I asked jeeves about this really quick, and the drying cabinet over heated. It wasn't from normal heated air type drying.

this is more of a rant than anything but. i did my first shoot with a model a week ago, and i ended up taking more medium format photos than 35mm. my view was that for an idea/specific pose, i only need a few frames of it to capture it. taking only a few on 35mm seems stupid because its cheap, so i take more on it but it felt 'spammy'. the only downside is smaller depth of field on my fuji 6x9. and why not get the extra image quality while i can?
also, convince me not to buy a hasselblad swc. its one of the 3 options (from what i found) for a 21mm equiv lens on MF. i love 21mm, i can shoot with an OVF and focus without a rangefinder/just by distance. but idk about the 6x6 square neg. maybe i should just stick with 35mm

File: Olympus_Pen_F-3413930015.jpg (2.83 MB, 5616x3744)

2.83 MB JPG

C...c...can I join in?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows
Photographer	Ashley Pomeroy
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:02:03 21:29:18
Exposure Time	1 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	5616
Image Height	3744
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4333592
No cunny in the MILF zone

File: E8cCd6Q.jpg (114 KB, 690x700)

114 KB JPG

>>4333587
>convince me not to buy a hasselblad swc. its one of the 3 options (from what i found) for a 21mm equiv lens on MF.

Just get a bronica sqa and 40mm. No dumb ovf, a camera you can use other lenses on, and at a fraction of the cost of an swc. Pic semirelated. SQA + 150mm on fuji 160C back in 2006

>>4332979

>EOS Rebel T2

Based knower. Weighs nothing and the kit lens it came with wasn't bad either.

File: 20240707_0004.jpg (2.64 MB, 5359x5120)

2.64 MB JPG

I like medium format, I feel like it elevates snapshits

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	ScanJet G4050
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:07:07 00:53:54
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5359
Image Height	5120

>>4333624
that is truly a great photo anon, if it really is yours. wow.

File: Yashica - mf snapshit.jpg (2.78 MB, 2750x2750)

2.78 MB JPG

>>4333939
i agree with you, but i don't know if it's actually a real effect, or if i'm just placebo-ing cause i know it's medium format lol.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS R
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.4 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:07 02:59:53
Exposure Time	1/13 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: CLKOLRG_8.jpg (17 KB, 450x450)

17 KB JPG

have RZ
have a pelican case for storage and an older Crumpler karachi Outpost (large) to hike the kit around. Been to multiple countries with it, but i'm finding it's too big these days and I want to downsize

Anyone rec a backpack or an insert that can fit the back + body + 110mm attached without being too massive? anyone else use something smaller?

>>4333939
>>4333949
nah it's real, those are both shitty images but still seem "neat" in some odd way

>>4333939
>>4333949
>>4333978
When I load up MF I have an obligation to make every shot count by premeditating every scene for a solid minute. Might as well put a chastity cage on my camera's shutter button since I rarely diddle it.

>>4333624
i actually think i remember you, you answered a question about flash in daylight and i remember this photo. anyway the bronica is another option, so 4 total. unfortunately i hate electronics/batteries in a camera (its irrational but oh well) and it seems a bit bulky. none of the options are perfect and each have their trade offs, whether its price, minimum focus distance, electronics, bulkiness, etc. why is everything so hard

File: LuQdZVk.jpg (363 KB, 1000x1000)

363 KB JPG

>>4333940
Thanks, used to shoot a lot of skate back then. That's why I bought a medium format camera in the first place.
SQ-A + 50mm on Provia

File: zEhpJKE.jpg (872 KB, 1200x1200)

872 KB JPG

>>4334018
Yep that could've been me, that photo used 2 flashes off camera. Fwiw I've gone thru 4 batteries in 20 years with my sqa. It's never let me down.

>>4334019
great shot

File: R5-24-5-24-319l.jpg (4.07 MB, 4096x3072)

4.07 MB JPG

>>4334018
mamiya 645 are great if you want a smol big camera

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:24 19:20:02
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4334021
i also think you said you intentionally underexpose by 0.5 or 1 stop when using flash (pretty sure it was that and not overexpose cause slide). i can tell one of the flashes is to the right and behind the skater ish. wheres the other? and the battery thing is more to do with electronics and what if it fails. its just a thing i have being anti digital and all. but ill strongly consider it, thanks
>>4334026
yeah but then im like why not just shoot 35mm at that point. im too picky. and i love rangefinders/ovf rather than an slr/screen
if there was a fuji 690 that had a 50mm lens (21mm equiv) i would buy it no matter the cost. i was even considering buying one and replacing the lens with a different one

>>4334060
Ya, underexpose ambient a bit to get whatever the flash is hitting to pop. Other flash is on the ground behind the orange barrier to give him a bit of rimlight.

>>4333949
>>4333978
People say that is because of the thin DoF but I think that is the tonality, the transition is smoother

>>4334026
Looks digital

>>4334060
>yeah but then im like why not just shoot 35mm at that point
That's the 4channer tendency to consoom to impress anonymous bots that don't care about you speaking

6cm x 4.5cm can not be "not enough". It's only a 14.5mm crop off the height of "glorious hasselblad 6x6". Would just taking the top off ruin the tonality? No. That's fucking retarded.

File: szdfgsdfgh.jpg (551 KB, 1350x1080)

551 KB JPG

some underexposed foma200

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:07 01:06:16
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: Jarman_Simon_Horizon.jpg (968 KB, 2383x3000)

968 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.3.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:07 20:11:46
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

File: Fuji Velvia 50-6.jpg (3.36 MB, 1780x2247)

3.36 MB JPG

>>4334185

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3 Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	154 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:09 23:47:30
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: Fuji Velvia 50-8.jpg (2.82 MB, 2223x1798)

2.82 MB JPG

>>4334187

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3 Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	154 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:09 23:47:30
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: Velvia 100 quickscan-2.jpg (3.56 MB, 1534x1954)

3.56 MB JPG

>>4334188

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3 Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	154 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:06 21:12:47
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

>>4334176
The dumber part is thinking you can publish a square image.

>>4334278
Square was a favored editorial format because it could be cropped vertically for covers or single pages or horizontally for double page spreads.

File: Image 74.jpg (4.76 MB, 5849x5843)

4.76 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	Perfection V800
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Image Height	7053
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Image Created	2019:01:04 11:08:04
Vertical Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Pixel Composition	RGB
Horizontal Resolution	3200 dpi
Image Width	7216
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	7216
Image Height	7053
Light Source	Unknown

>>4334280
Exactly what I said

>>4334278
Yes, the entire point of squares is cropping. Hence why people who call 645 "not real medium format" but enthusiastically go for 6x6 are stupid.

It's just a precropped square. By a very small amount. Aspect ratios don't factor into crop factor discussions because their impact is negligible. Crop factor itself is negligible until you get a 2x cf difference except in digital because digital can use absurd ISOs and people seem to like enlarging their d850 snapshits at 72ppi?????

File: IMG11193.jpg (1.19 MB, 1919x2400)

1.19 MB JPG

>>4331860
no photo because the scanner I bought arrived broken
>>4333624
what shutter speed did you use here?
something that's been annoying me is the SQ-Ai maxing out at 1/500

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-1
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	70 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:07:07 15:31:38
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	2000
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1919
Image Height	2400
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Close View

>>4334278
I can post square jpegs wherever I want and frame and mount square prints wherever I want. Same with any other aspect ratio. Since when did "publishing" matter to anyone who shoots for fun?

>>4334335
shooting a formulaic clothing ad for better homes and gardens is real art unlike gay winogays snapshits that "are in museums" chud!

>>4334336
You clearly don’t go to a lot of museums

File: DSCF5732.jpg (2.19 MB, 4000x3000)

2.19 MB JPG

>>4334191
>>4334187
>>4334185
beautiful
>>4333030
idk there's one more lens i'm thinking of trying with it. but i am feeling a kinda tired of buying gear rn

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	GFX 50R
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.38
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	40 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:08 01:49:33
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/10.9
Brightness	9.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4000
Image Height	3000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Blur Status	OK
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Auto Exposure Status	OK
Flash Mode	Unknown
Focus Mode	Manual
Focus Status	OK
Picture Mode	Manual Exposure
Sharpness	Normal
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
White Balance	Auto

>>4334176
>>4334280
thats actually a pretty good point about the cropping. i dont care or didnt mention tonality cause i shoot black and white 95% of the time. what are my options for 21mm equiv on 645? one of the downsides of 6x6 in my initial thinking was that yeah it makes images a bit hard to use directly (without cropping). i was a bit of a purist/autist about never cropping but now i realise thats stupid

>>4334509
Thanks my dude, slide film is fun when I forget its 9 dollars a shot and takes a month to get back from the lab

>>4331860
>hasselblad 500
>mamiya rz67
>mamiya rb67
>pentax 67
Which should I buy?

>>4334625

RB if you actually wanna take pictures

Pentax if you want to carry it everywhere

RZ if you want that K/L glass and updates over the RB

Hasselblad if you want street creed

>>4334625
If you don’t have a specific project it really doesn’t matter.

>>4334631
>RZ if you want that K/L glass
the RB67 pro SD can also take L and K/L lenses

>>4334625
If you're not adverse to a TLR get a Rolleiflex. They're cheaper, lighter,smaller, easier to use and more reliable than any of the SLR's you listed.

>>4334782
>TLR
nayrt but I could never get used to the reversed view in a TLR finder. somehow, view cameras are just fine for me.
>put a prism on it
then it's just a very impractical SLR

does anyone have experience with the bronica GS1?

>>4334803
With a leaf shutter.

>>4334829
you say that as if it was unusual for MF SLRs

>>4334832
Leaf shutter and no moving mirror.

File: IMG_8271.jpg (99 KB, 1024x837)

99 KB JPG

>>4334832
>KA-CHUNK

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	837
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4334838
Nonissue for RZs. Do your research.

>>4334847
You're saying mirror slap isn't an issue on them? Because you have a mirror lock? The shutter is just a little click sound on a rolleiflex, and you can still see everything.

File: IMG_8274.jpg (98 KB, 1024x650)

98 KB JPG

>>4334847
>Muh mirror lockup
Retard. The RZ67 is a lot of things, but it's not a TLR/rangefinder. It's also a hilariously oversized homunculus of a camera even when compared to the pig that is the Pentax 67.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	650
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4334848
>>4334851
It’s not an issue because of the RZs design. Have fun on Google!

>>4334852
In the rz67 manual it says that mirror lock up is recommended for situations when no mirror vibration is necessary. Nothing else about a super special magic mirror...

>>4334854
Aww are you reading the manual for a camera you don’t own? :^)

>>4334858
Lmao you're cope posting. If you weren't a retard you would know that reading camera manuals is a good way to understand their function and features.

Truly embarrassing post there, bud.

>>4334859
You read manuals for cameras you don’t own, bud?

File: mamiya-1990_4862.jpg (475 KB, 1169x1650)

475 KB JPG

>>4334862
Occasionally when I'm curious about the camera, bud.

Let me guess. You are instantly sold on a camera after seeing the half page ad for it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4334864
You have ads for cameras you’ll never own lol.

File: IMG_8270.jpg (40 KB, 400x288)

40 KB JPG

>>4334862
That's a weird hill to die on, shaming someone for reading an instruction manual for a camera. Does baby need a YouTube video from an obnoxious self-inflated idiot who thinks every camera they put their filthy paws on is the best ever made?

Tell me then motherfucker since you've made it the crux of your argument, why mirror slap is nonexistent on the RZ.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	400
Image Height	288
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4334869
Imagine thinking an rz67 is expensive. I have an rb67 with 5 lenses, and much prefer my rolleiflex 2.8 planar and mamiya 6.

You keep getting funnier and funnier.

>>4334873
Did I say nonexistent or nonissue?

>>4334875
Finances are a soft spot for you.

>>4334873
She found a way to be an even bigger loser than a nophoto. It's honestly impressive.

>>4334859
Don't sweat it, sounds like he buys cameras based off vibes and youtube hype videos lmfao

>>4334843
what are you implying

File: 110mm_PhaseOne_B+W_web - Copy.jpg (642 KB, 1417x1062)

642 KB JPG

Just got a high rez medium format digital back for my RZ Pro ii that I tested tonight. 110mm, Phase One P40+ digital back. I'm liking the results for boring tests. Can't wait to start shooting portraits with this this.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	7320
Image Height	5484
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:10 20:38:20
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Light Source	Flash
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1417
Image Height	1062
White Balance	Unknown
Unique Image ID	E05800000065000C04010C1E73002487

Is there an MF camera you can take into the field? As I've used my RB more and more I've just come to realize people weren't meant to walk around with studio cameras.

>>4335310
Any camera can be handheld if you aren't a pussy. If you want the absolute most compact/lightweight get a folder.

>>4335310
Eat more beef, drink less onions. Or get a Mamiya 330

>>4335311
>>4335315
It's not that I can't carry it, it's just bulky as shit and awkward to get out of my bag if I need to catch a shot. There's a 6x6 Fujinon I think that's pretty compact might give that a try.

File: 110mm_PhaseOne2_web - Copy.jpg (549 KB, 1417x1062)

549 KB JPG

>>4335308
color test same set up

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	7320
Image Height	5484
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:10 22:11:25
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
Light Source	Flash
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1417
Image Height	1062
White Balance	Unknown
Unique Image ID	E05800000065000C04010C1E730024A0

>>4335310
why do you think Mamiya 6 and 7 are so expensive? they are the goat field camera

>>4335308
>>4335324
Nice pictures anon. While I can't attest to the merits of digital medium format they look very sharp indeed.

>>4335327
Because it's MSRP adjusted for inflation was that high to begin with. Great system overall, BTFOs every other MF camera when it comes to absolute resolution, nothing comes close.

File: test3_web - Copy.jpg (1.27 MB, 1417x1062)

1.27 MB JPG

>>4335324
>>4335328
another color test

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:10 22:37:07
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Light Source	Flash
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1417
Image Height	1062
White Balance	Unknown
Unique Image ID	E05800000065000C04010C1E7300247F

File: GmoneyWestCanyonTrail.jpg (714 KB, 800x800)

714 KB JPG

>>4335310
When I lived out west id take my bronica on multi day hikes all the time. It's much smaller than a stupid rb

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: 081.jpg (875 KB, 1000x1000)

875 KB JPG

b r o n i c a
r
o
n
i
c
a

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6645
Image Height	6634
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2014:07:05 17:39:46
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000

>>4335339
ETRS, S2, GS-1? How many lenses and what's the weather proofing situation?

>take my bronica on multi day hikes
You're a fucking masochist

>>4335334
>>4335324
>>4335308
Really makes me want a digital back for my gx680, but the prices for them make me cry. Nice shots

File: gs7TKne.jpg (64 KB, 465x593)

64 KB JPG

>>4335341
SQ-A. Usually 1-2 lenses, 2 backs. Doubt it's weatherproofed but I've been treating it like pic rel for 20 years without issue. It survived 8yrs hiking in Vancouver bc no problem.

>>4331862
flat as fuck. not even large format

pussy

>>4335340
>thot facing away from camera
Instantly ruins any photo, fyi.

Headed to SF soon for 3 days, Going to bring my m6451000s, I only have room for whatever lens is attached to the body so I need to decide between 80mm 2.8, or 55mm 2.8.

decide for me because i am incapable of simple decision making.

What would a good body choice be if I'm planning on doing landscape photography that is going to require a lot of backpacking to get to location?
something light weight and preferably not crazy expensive.
would prefer an internal light meter but if I must use something external like my phone or a dedicated spot meter I could make it work.
last time I just took phone pictures and while they look good I'd like something I can really blow up and look at every detail and print large.

>>4335775
unfortunately unless you want to spend thousands or carry a mamiya pig it seems the only good cameras in existence are the pentax 6x7, hasselblad v system, and bronica sq-a

>>4335775
Super Baldax

>>4335775
Wooden 4x5 field camera. I bet you could make it lighter than a similarly priced MF camera.

File: Screenshot_20240711_12245(...).jpg (564 KB, 1080x1980)

564 KB JPG

>>4335781
I looked that up and came upon this. seems to focus on being super light. I wonder if it's any good? uses mamiya lenses and back

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Android UP1A.231005.007.G998USQSBGXF1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1080
Image Height	1980

>>4335775
Crown graphic

>>4335913
At that point do the large format memery right and get a Wista or a Horseman45

>>4335349
umad

>>4335775
thinking more on this, how dumb would a TLR be? The shape would make it easy to pack in to a case in my bag without the lens hanging out making it oblong and prone to damage.
Are there TLRs with wide lenses worth a damn?

File: 1e6.jpg (41 KB, 600x727)

41 KB JPG

>Mfw 2 week vacation in Moab, Utah with Velvia 50 and full RB67 outfit

I should be okay using a regular RB rotating mechanism on a Pro-S body and Pro-S backs? My Pro-SD rotating component wont let me shoot landscape mode and I found a regular one, and with the cover off the back I can dry fire it and see the open aperture

I tried repairing the back and couldn't find anything loose, not sure what's going on there. No issues with the past couple of rolls off of it.

File: 041.jpg (1.4 MB, 1000x1000)

1.4 MB JPG

>>4335963
It'd be dumb because for landscape film photography you'll probably be wanting to use graduated nd and polarizer filters. SLR would be preferred.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4984
Image Height	4999
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2012:11:17 20:35:41
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1000

>>4335978
You can add filters to TLRs no problem, you just need one for each lens if you want to see what it looks like first.

File: unknown-4.png (2.27 MB, 931x928)

2.27 MB PNG

>>4335979
Much harder to do with graduated nds. Something like a bronica or hasselblad are totally fine for hiking

File: hasselblad.jpg (1.68 MB, 4032x3024)

1.68 MB JPG

>>4331860
>Post your setup and one photo for entry

wouldn't give up my hasselblad for anything. The Distagon 50mm FLE is a recent grab, haven't gotten to shoot too many rolls with it yet but its a really pleasant focal length.

I have a Bronica ETRSi as well, nice camera but it hasn't seen any use since I picked up the 'blad.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: smallsize 4.jpg (3 MB, 4000x4000)

3 MB JPG

>>4336116
nothing too interesting for photos

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	EPSON
Camera Model	GT-X970
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	4000
Image Height	4000

File: blad.jpg (2.6 MB, 4032x3024)

2.6 MB JPG

>>4335985
can confirm hasselblad fine for hiking

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>4336118
Where is this?

>>4336133
>tfw your photos OF the "blad" are better than WITH the "blad"
yikes

>>4335985
You just have to make sure they're rotated the same. What did you find hard about it?