>>4332760
Beautiful.

>>4332760
Seems the rumours of half frame being a quality sacrifice are overblown. Great shot.

>>4332768
desu, it only happens if you are shooting something with big grain like Colorpus

File: 1000006331 (2).jpg (2.56 MB, 1500x2000)

2.56 MB JPG

>>4332767
>>4332768
>>4332773
You got fooled by a 12yo samsung digishit with a smartphone filter.
If I were you I'd commit suicide and learn to check EXIF next time.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	WB30F/WB31F/WB32F
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	53 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:04 20:41:07
Exposure Time	1/45 sec
F-Number	f/4.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.4
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	9.60 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	2000
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal

>>4332777
digits confirm, based anon destroying poser fags

>>4332777
I was talking about your cat, dumbass. The snapshit is a 1/10 animal picture.

I take back my compliment, and think that cat is ugly and stupid looking.

File: 20240704_205306.jpg (4.76 MB, 4000x3000)

4.76 MB JPG

>>4332777
This bad boy beats your $3000 Leica M3 with a Summilux apparently

>>4332760
One of the stupidest looking cats I have ever seen in my life.

>>4332777
Ahahaha i love you

File: 1362970200740.gif (45 KB, 240x181)

45 KB GIF

>>4332767
>>4332768
>>4332773

File: 1709882976895775.jpg (10 KB, 168x300)

10 KB JPG

>>4332777

>>4332777
You revealed it too soon. Should've waited a day or two.

>>4332790
i think ppl would have caught on by then and OP would have ended up looking like a fool

File: 1UP TORONTO KODAK GOLD 200.jpg (4.03 MB, 3456x2234)

4.03 MB JPG

Kodak Gold 200 half-frame scan

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 25.7 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:04 08:44:51
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	3456
Image Height	2234

>>4332797
OP has been eternally btfo.

>>4332790
Have you ever seen an single photo thread on this board with the first reply
>Beautiful
Ever?

>>4332803
Filmfags do be like that

>>4332803
This, kek. Forced meme.

>>4332805
Catfags, newfag.

>>4332803
>>4332806
Schizophrenic filmfags already coping hard

Did you take the photo op or just find it somewhere?
It’s amazing how the composition rules can elevate a snapshit

>>4332777
based op exposing /p/haggots

>>4332797
How do we know you're not just pulling the exact same ruse? :A)

>>4332823
How could I have found it somewhere if it was shot today and has full EXIF

Nice try op, editing your portra 800 to look digital and attaching a fake exif.
You won’t fool /p that easily.

>everyone itt but me opened a photo of a cat
Wew

>>4332851
Can you judge format by a quick glimpse of a thumbnail?

>>4332837

Nobody on /p uses composition rules to this level, show me one other picture on here using this many compositional rules in a single photo.

>This camera fooled 4chan into thinking it was a film camera
>Take film like pictures with this cheap hidden gem
>Price is now $500

>>4332866

Can’t trust op he already lied once, also there is no way he took that photo.

>does half frame really look this bad
>this looks nothing like portra wtf happened
>oh
To be fair I've only shot medium format on film for the past while, which is a lot more forgiving on film stocks.
>>4332864
>composition rules
lol

>>4332875

That picture is elite level composition.
Nobody could take that without extensive knowledge and highly likely graphic design or art degree.

>>4332876
OP, stop trying to get someone to agree with you. Everyone knew your photo was a sham to begin with.

>>4332891

That’s how it fooled everybody though, it’s actually very high iq composition which is almost exclusively achieved by film shooters. 1 in a million to see a digislop that advanced which is why people fell for it.

File: 1000006343.jpg (1.23 MB, 1025x1366)

1.23 MB JPG

>>4332905
It's not that deep dude

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	WB30F/WB31F/WB32F
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	100 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:05 07:19:21
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/5.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	80
Lens Aperture	f/5.4
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	17.90 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1025
Image Height	1366
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal

>>4332929

This one is not to the same standard, it’s got a few rules but nowhere as much

>>4332933

2 of the corners aren’t even anchored, this one’s way behind the cat photo, not even in the same ballpark.

>>4332767
>>4332768
OP please

kot :)

>>4332777
ebin troll, checked

>>4332777
include me in the screencap

>samefag
>le ebin trol

>>4332777
delete this

File: 1000006280 (1).jpg (483 KB, 1086x1366)

483 KB JPG

>>4332934
Whatever you say

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	WB30F/WB31F/WB32F
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.3
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:05 12:43:24
Exposure Time	3/5000 sec
F-Number	f/3.3
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	80
Lens Aperture	f/3.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	5.10 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1086
Image Height	1366
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal

>>4332760
SOVL
>>4332777
Soulless. It is what it is.

>>4332777
HOLY BASED FUCK FILMFAGGOTS
DIGISHITTERS RISE UP

File: P1070522-Edit.jpg (4.03 MB, 3648x2736)

4.03 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-LX3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:13 18:25:40
Exposure Time	1/25 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	12.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4335181
Aside from the exif, what gives it away are the blown out taillights

File: 20240716_195933.jpg (2.64 MB, 3456x3456)

2.64 MB JPG

Lmao nice going opie. I say this sitting on a bench holding a half frame camera in my lap. You really got some anons mad.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-A536U1
Camera Software	A536U1UES9EXE3
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:16 19:59:34
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	250
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	0.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	5.23 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3456
Image Height	3456
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Unique Image ID	F64ESNGR0AM

>>4338309
I should've probably enabled the film compression option...