[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: soyrings.jpg (12 KB, 200x195)
12 KB
12 KB JPG
Why are some photographers so worked up over that?
>Aspherical optics are creating sharper images than ever before, new technology makes it easier to manufacture.
>NOOOO SØY-RINGS NOOOOO THE BOKEH NOOOOOO.
>>
>>4334324
pixel peeping

i have never seen this shit except when checking focus. both exporting for 4k and printing at 250+dpi makes it invisible.
>>
w-huh??? where would this appear? what even is that image?
>>
>>4334329
In the bokeh balls
>>
>>4334330
holy pixel peep batman. OP better show us some examples of photographers actually getting upset over this, I won't believe anyone would actually care about this otherwise.
>>
>>4334324

would /p/ like to discuss difference of multiple aspherical elements vs none aspherical elements plus software correction

i hear canon 28mm has three aspherical elements
>>
>>4334353
Underrated banger of a lens.
>>
>>4334330
>>4334343
I had to zoom wayyyyyyy the fuck in to see that one some of my first images with a crappy rf-s-55-210mm, who genuinely gives a fuck about this lmfao.
Checking my RF100-400mm it's barely noticeable on the corners
>pic rel
I'll post the ones from the RF-S-55-210mm after
>>4334353
>>4334355
unironically been eyeing that lens landscapes and maybe astro stopped down besides my rf50mm 1.8f(which needs to be stopped down to 2.8f to be sharp). Any experience with it?
>>
File: donion-rings-muh-iq-kek.png (799 KB, 3465x1587)
799 KB
799 KB PNG
>>4334400
>double dubs
nice
Here's the rfs-55-210mm one
>>
>>4334324
They can actually be a bit distracting in images with huge bokeh balls from long lenses and specular highlights at night like using a 135mm at night in the city.
>>
File: seagullbutbetter-3.jpg (3.78 MB, 3072x2017)
3.78 MB
3.78 MB JPG
>>4334400
This screenshot is from this image: >>4332183
>>4334401
This one is one of the first pictures I've ever taken with my r50 that blew my mind being brand new into the hobby which made me pursue it further. Not an incredible image by any means but fell in love from it lmao.
>pic rel
>>4334403
Do you have any examples? I can see how it'd maybe be annoying on absolutely massive bokeh balls but I feel like the lack of bokeh balls would make the overall image worse rather than the onion ring ones.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS R50
Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/7.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2024:03:28 17:05:25
Exposure Time1/500 sec
F-Numberf/7.1
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/7.1
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length210.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>4334353
>multiple aspherical elements vs none aspherical elements plus software correction
what if I told you that software correction is frequently needed even for lenses with multiple aspherics?
>>
And don't even mention the cat-eye bokeh
>>
>>4334417
this is mechanical vignetting and has nothing to do with aspherical elements. lens manufacturers could eliminate this phenomenon completely by using ungodly large front diameters. I bet building a 50mm lens with a 122mm front diameter would eliminate this completely.
>>
>>4334417
This shit is awesome and no-one can convince me otherwise
>>
>>4334455
Yup, but it is another one of those things that some put way too much importance in.
>>
>>4334455

>What is 58/1.2 Noct-Nikkor
>>
>>4334329
it is the self interference of light waves within a lens which creates this pattern

>>4334324
when I was younger, I created a homemade laser interferometer and used a camera lens to format the final output of the device. I was able to see (and morph/interact with) this exact pattern as it was projected onto my wall. with miniscule adjustments to the air between my mirrors, I was able to create immeasurably small disturbances in the fluid and witnessed an evolution of the interference pattern which I only wish I could describe. truly a beautiful and complex sight which I will never forget. light itself is an amazing entity and we are lucky to have engineers who have come before us and built these cameras to capture it, even for a moment. the interplay of light is one of the greatest mysteries of the cosmos, and one we still work on understanding today
>>
>>4334456
I like it too, especially as they curve around the edge of a frame
>>
File: image-13.jpg (125 KB, 1600x900)
125 KB
125 KB JPG
>>4334456
>>4334674
It's distracting as fug
>>
>>4334739
Cat surrounded by catseye bokeh balls would be peak kino
The distracting part there is the soap bubble balls and busy nervous looking bokeh
>>
>>4334739
I think the soap bubble effect is more distracting than the cats eye effect
>>
>>4334568
>it is the self interference of light waves within a lens which creates this pattern
really? coz I'm pretty sure it's because of the "ridges" or unevenness on the surface of the asphere due to imperfect molding or polishing
>>
>>4334773
Poor quality finish on the optics. I bet it's sigma
>>
File: 33648612570_503b1fa1ba_k.jpg (227 KB, 2048x1363)
227 KB
227 KB JPG
Summilux-M 50mm f/1.4 ASPH.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.