This still needs a little work.
film photographers confirmed soulless snapshitters
heh
>>4337223heheheh
Philosophically, having a machine tell you when you are acting too much like a machine is the single most constructive application of AIHuman brains actually have a self-determined level of consciousness, set by how often you are able to collapse probability states and to what degree of finesse, including those of your own thoughts. You need to consciously maintain your free will. If you do not, external measurements of probabilities take precedent and you are victimized by determinism - an NPC. In the future, if your activity patterns start aligning with what an AI (lacking self measurement routines) would do, you could be warned that you are failing to maintain your consciousness and will stop being a free thinker if you do not start working towards greater self awareness.Rest assured AI will probably never be able to set its own states as a conscious observer. Souls did not evolve in reality. Rather, souls arranged reality so that they would be able to inhabit it, and AI will lack the structures needed for a soul to set states in it until someone tries running it on a sophisticated quantum computer. If souls begin inhabiting AI based on a quantum computer or an organic brain (a weak form of a quantum computer) we're going to see some shit.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1400Image Height700
>>4337223>>4337225You just know
>>4337259…that dog is exceptionally well cared for and well behaved
>>4337264No I was thinking the owner fucks his dog and then proudly posts photos on 4chan for attention even though he is a known dogfuckerI am glad that with each photo posted he brings himself closer to revealing his identity, which at that point will be turned over to the relevant legal authority in his area for hopeful arrest and prosecution of bestiality and animal abuse
>>4337269I know, you've been saying this on /an/ since I told a zoophile that he should be skinned alive. Then "total zoophile death" and he was off to the races, trying to larp as me, poorly photoshopping shit onto my dog to make her asshole look blown out, etc. That's his idea of "revenge" because I told him bestiality was ontologically evil. He thinks it's possible to frame me as a zoophile and get me arrested.Or you copied that guy because you want me to respond to your posts. I wouldn't put being an NPC past you.
>>4337281Hate to break it to you schizoI don't browse /an/Never been to the board, not even onceDidn't read the rest of your garbage post
>>4337282Right, you just act exactly like them. And organically, I was never called a dogfucker until the pet photo contest got crosslinked from /an/.It's not like this schizo hasn't been around for a while either.
>>4337281>poorly photoshopping shit onto my dog to make her asshole look blown outlol, did he really?
>>4337283Yeah I don't keep up with every facet of your dogfucker posting life and could care lessYou are a drama queen attention whore and dogfucker to boot
>>4337225the eyes of a victim
>>4337287Either you are that schizo, or your just happen to have imitated his shtick because you're a retard. There's not a win condition in here. You're unhinged.
>>4337289Quality analysis, coming from a man who copulates with dogs
>>4337287>drama queen attention whore>would have posted photos and fucked off if you weren't constantly acting like a nutjob and accusing people of unforgivable sins and federal crimes?
>>4337296>I'm going to make this mft thread my bitchYeah no you disingenuous dogfucking liarCome on, you wanted to derail the thread to be about you and got what you wantedStop complaining you "bitch"
>>4337299>>4337294he drove you straight over the edgeall u had to do was post photos too lolololololyou know huskychad shoots mft too right lol?
>>4337300who is huskychad?
>>4337300>huskychad cringe samefagging
>>4337283It's a meme, you dip
>>4337223>>4337225seek help anondon't fuck dogs to relieve your trauma
>>4337302not huskychad btw
>>4337299Best of all, he made the mft thread into bitches. Since he shoots mft too only the chart guy he shit on has a reason to be mad, right? Unless this /an/ stalker is behind the constant meltdown
>>4337308Every mft thread he posts his shitty dogfucking photos taken with non-mft cameras on purpose to "troll", get negative attention, attention whore, etc.Fuck off lying faggot
>>4337315I take some of them with an mft lolWhy do you think I started faking exif
>>4337315there's a technicality you're missing about "mft" threads. they aren't stated to be threads for talking about mft cameras. they aren't stated to be photo threads. the op, and principle discussion, is always inaccurate dr charts and equivalence delusions. it's not like /fag/ where it's for fuji photos, it's just a gear thread being made outside of /gear/ and is essentially disposable.
>>4337318>acktually, mft threads have nothing to do with mftseek help
>>4337320its truemft threads are normally very poor in photos and very rich in people trying to convince a schizophrenic idiot that photons to photos charts are labeled based on iso setting, not real iso, and equivalence isn't very important in real life shooting situationsthen someone posts a bunch of awesome dog photos and this instills so much awe in the denizens of the mft thread that they finally start posting photos.
>>4337323>I don't like mft threads so I can shit them up and offtopic post because I am a giant flaming faggotTake meds
>>4337326>be mfturd>try and spread flat earth tier lies>get told off>double down on being retarded>*BEEP BEEP BEEP*>oh shit huskychad's backing up his dump truck>NOOOOOO>buried in photos>flat earth chart thread is now a photo thread>how will the fool framers be btfo by p2p's inaccurate dr figures now!?
>>4337326>mft thread: not about photos, not about photography, about literal console wars on the basis of misinterpreting roughly made spec charts from some guy's blogdeserved
>>4337327who are you quoting, the voices in your head?
>>4337341last time he did it they only cried a little and spent the next 2 threads photo posting. the extent of this shitshow is new and apparently involves the cross board “4x5 dude is a zoophile” fag…
>>4337364Weird how you keep repeating the same false informationYou can tell your lies as many times as you want, it doesn't make it the truthOnly a retard like yourself would try to frame posting mft photos in mft threads on a photo board as something negativeNext time, Huskyfucker can make his own dogfucking photo thread instead of hijacking other threads, and admitting to it
>>4337259>>4337264>>4337269>>4337281>>4337282>>4337283>>4337287>>4337288>>4337289>>4337294>>4337296>>4337299>>4337300>>4337301>>4337302>>4337303>>4337304>>4337306>>4337308>>4337315>>4337316>>4337318>>4337320>>4337323>>4337326>>4337327>>4337341>>4337346>>4337364>>4337369KEEP THIS BULLSHIT IN THE RELEVANT THREADS, YOU FUCKING NIGGERS.
>mft thread>posting photoslolthey so mad they in other threads whining about it
>>4337376>>4337216>the algorithm thinks film photos are more aiLol wut? Is it because of the unrealistic colors and tones? Digital is more real = less ai?
>>4337382Kinda curious, I wonder if the algo would rate it as more human if the colors were desaturated and image unsharpened Not curious enough to test it though lol
>>4337378Remind me, what was the relevant thread when that dogdiddler decided to make the mft thread his "bitch" and offtopic postIf his behavior is acceptable I do not see why any other anon cannot do the sameI agree though it's complete faggotryIt's too bad this board doesn't have unique identifiers for each poster like /pol/, that way it would be easier to hide posters and move on
>>4337382Seems like it. The AI meter is usually higher for film. Probably because film is so uncommon that film aesthetics are likely to be AI generated, and an algorithm doesnt actually know what film looks like, just that it doesn't look like confirmed "real" digital photos.>>4337383Not more human, more hipster.
>>4337387Weird, I guess they need a larger dataset Also curious to see whether these ratings stay stable over time or change as the dataset grows I assume they pay thirdworlders pennies per hour to eventually go back and rate all the submitted images to improve quality of the algo
It definitely does not like film
>>4337390This was a portrait of a real person, simply shot on film and a very good, ultra sharp no-distortion 50mm primeThe algo HATES film scans. If this is how normal people will determine photo realness does it even matter if we have original negatives?
>>4337386>chad enters thread>sees a bunch of bickering about some idiot who takes p2p literally>"ur data is wrong ur logic is fallible, 100 posts no photos time to fix that">posts photos, a mix of ff, film, and mft with faked exif>thread since then is photos and actual photography talk whenever you can restrain yourself from being schizophrenic>you cant, you spread your meltdown to several other threadsthe only problem here is you desu
>>4337398so weird you talk about yourself in the third personno more replies 4 u
Algo is trash lol, gonna post a couple more to give it more variety
>>4337410thats right go run off to play with your micro 4/3s lol
Finally got a human result
So its basically>is this a landscape or is there a clear subject? ai generated "picture of">are the colors unrealistic? ai.black and white and more abstract elements make it think a human did it
I wounder how soon it gonna be when /p/ goes into autistic schizo spasm episodes when photography as career is comepletly uncompetetive to AI.Stock and marketing photography has basically been killed by AI already.
>>4337437The only photography that matters for making money is essentially journalism (actual journalism, events, weddings, sports) and replication of real things (advertising shoots, digitizing) which MUST show the actual product, not a CGI approximation.You even need real photos to feed the AI. So it's fine.
>>4337216>ayy eye itself cant properly detect ai gen imageslollmao
>>4337441i bet its standard for a real photo is an iphone selfie
>>4337442that wasn't film btw, but rather a manually processed raw from my phonestill signals a false positive
>>4337443Film and digital edited to have wrong colors look the same btw
Shitty quality b&w film pic is apparently as real as it gets
This website basically calls you out on being unoriginal
>>4337444they are correct to my eyes>inb4 get zeiss spectaclesno.
guess I'm living in a simulation[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid UP1A.231005.007.A256EXXS2AXD1Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1080Image Height2340Unique Image ID696430cf-5ec9-4ed0-aa07-7ab0852deb10
