hey /p/, i'm thinking of getting a camera and ditching my phone and i'm looking one of the best cameras of this size (it can be bigger that's fine but never like a dslr) but that i can at least swap the lenses, i don't know much about modern cameras but if there are some with usb-c so i can quickly transfer the photos to my pc and no gps/antena/wi-fi garbage just photos and videos with basic interface no bullshit
The newer Canons (R50 and more $$$) have USBC to USBC transferring and interchangable lenses. If you want that in a camera you need something made at least since 2021
>>4337635If you want something compact with interchangeable lenses you get an M43 or Canon R50. Also heard good things about some snoys but I can't vouch. USB-C is totally a thing but only from rather recently, which means M43 is out the window. I however would suggest you just take the SD card out and get a $25 UHS-I card reader. I find that plenty convenient but you do you fren. WiFi is found on most modern cameras save maybe some really shit digicams and bridge cameras.Post your budget and photography needs if you want actual recommendations though and be well fuckin' aware that if you want an Interchangeable Lens Camera (ILC), you are going to spend more on lenses than the body eventually, so budget accordingly. For example, one body I spent $350 on second hand, and my first lens was $400. It was a very good macro lens, but my point stands.pic rel is my M43 cameras with no scale but I can tell you each of those are small enough to cover side to side with one hand.
>>4337681forgot the fucking picture[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS R50Lens Size18.00 - 45.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.0Lens NameRF-S18-45mm F4.5-6.3 IS STMImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:07:15 02:14:35Exposure Time1/20 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating6400Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo FlashFocal Length24.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3984Image Height2656RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeMediumFocus ModeUnknownDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingNormalMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance0.340 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed352Color Matrix129
>>4337635>but that i can at least swap the lenseswhy?
>>4337682these little things have wi-fi? why?
>>4337766?? Speedy image transfer
>>4337827>speedyclearly you've never used it. it's slow, unstable, and relies on a godawful, jeet developed app.wifi transfer is not even usable on $2500 full frame mirrorless shit. you take the card out, or you have an ethernet port for fast ftp uploads. this hasn't changed in like 15 years.
>>4337766Only the white one, the E-PL7 does. Everything before that didn't iirc.WiFi is okay for a handful of photos at max, since they somehow cram the worst antennae running at like max. 40Mbps and a single RAW can take like 5-10 seconds, let alone a whole folder full of RAWs and JPEGs. WiFi is conveience for single photos, and this goes for basically ANY camera with WiFi.Honest to god just take your SD card out and stick it in a reader. Bonus points for the ethernet idea from >>4337831 since storing things on a NAS and sending shit at 5Gbps is glorious. Will need an SSD for that, as spinning rust will cap out at about 120Mbps without some fancy raid 0 nonsense you wouldn't use in a home NAS anyway. Fuck, what blue board is this again?
>>4337638>>4337681Sony have had type C ports on their full frame bodies since 2017. Not sure about their crop bodies though, it seems that some realised after that time still hade micro USB.
>>4338490Yup the early years of USBc it was still being treated as a premium/top model feature and not just another port, so the 6x00 models took longer to get it.
