Sony a7RIIISony a7RIVSony a7SIIISony a9IIICanon EOS R6iiCanon EOS R8Canon EOS R7Panasonic Lumix S5mk2Panasonic Lumix S5mk2X
>worstall of those except the r6ii>bestr6ii, r5, z8, zf, gfx100sii, x-t5, r7
>>4337819>r6iiyikes
>>433782412fps mech shutter is nothing to laugh at. It's a mirrorless 1d.E shutter that falls short of being global shutter or a 1/250 DSLR sync equivalent WITH FULL DYNAMIC RANGE is essentially gimmicks. Cameras are not there yet. Just look at the a9iii. It's the first actually usable e-shutter, and it only has 1 stop less noise than micro four thirds. Tech still has 5-10 years to improve.
>>4337826>It's a mirrorless 1dnot even close. 1dxiii got 16fps in flappy mirror mode or 20fps in live view mode. 12fps of the r6ii is closer to the dogshit snoy's 10fps mechanical shutter than the 1dxiii.
>>4337837I said 1d not 1dxiii learn to readGood enough for herons catching fish good enough for you
>>4337837>snoy's 10fpssnoy hasn't shot 10fps with full raw bit depth since the third generation models that also vomited out their shutter curtains, died if exposed to dense fog, and rendered flesh tones as either sickly green or plastic orange
>>4337839If your comparison baseline is a camera released in 2001, then canon must have really shit the fucking bed with the r6ii
>muh fpsand yet the best photos ever taken were shot under 1fpsits all been downhill from there. less fps = better photos. pentax 645z supremacy!
This kind of premise is silly. Anyone reasonable should be happy with any of those cameras and they're all capable of superb quality images. I would personally take the A7R IV out of the lot, but that's because I currently have the A7R II. My friend has an S5 II and it is a great camera too.
>>4337812fuck ya mudda
>>4337812Canon R7Canon R8Lumix S5IILumix S5IIxSony A7SIIISony A7RIIICanon R6IISony A7RIVSony A9III
>>4337842Sourse on dense fog claim?, I shoot my A7iV in fog denser than your mothers ass all the time, don’t want it to explode[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M4Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.5 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)67 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationUnknownHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2023:10:02 22:21:16Exposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1000Lens Aperturef/2.8Brightness-5.1 EVExposure Bias-3.3 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceTungstenFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length67.40 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2700Image Height4050RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4337982>upgrade to the fourth generation before your gen I-III snoy rusts
>>4338176Used to have the OG A7 and my hand rusted off trying to hold it, shit is like a rock climbing crimp
>>4337982Apparently they fixed it later because people were complaining so muchBut in reality maybe 5% of people with a camera actually rely on the weather sealing ever and just as insurance for a surprise drizzle
>>4338183I super needed it, photography is just a hobby for me but I love shooting in the rain decided to pick up a 50mm 1.4 GM recently 2nd hand so I didn’t kill my extending barrel zoom lens
>>4337824>i just NEED 8k 120fps recording
>>4337812>all except the following two>S5IIX>A7SIII
>>4338504why? may i ask
>>4338512>S5IIXsecond best AF on the FF market, best IBIS, best menus, video features done right (the best), cheap(ish)>A7SIIIlow megapixel sensor, excellent video DR, excellent low light, built from the ground up as a video machine without caveats, perfect AFsince it's a 48MP sensor with 4 physical pixels per image pixel the well depth is somethig crazy like 150keCanon has shit codecs and weak ibis (or none at all), the A7RIII is excellent for stills but useless for video in 2024 and poor weather sealing, the A9III is a dynamic range disaster that's only good for photo/video in good light.
