>>4363193
Sounds like chatGPT-generated ragebait.
Frogposter, snapshitter, what else?

>>4363193
>she laughed at me for being a pleb, for not doing photography like "it's meant to be".
give up photography, cuckold. there is no such thing as "doing photography like "it's meant to be"".

do whatever you enjoy. digital is cool.

once again digicucks want to be like film

>>4363193

That’s ok anon just wait until your 500th hour in Lightroom or photoshop messing around with sliders in frustration while the colours still look bad.
At that point you might discover film is actually a lot less work to get a nicer looking photo.

>>4363193
there’s nothing particularly more methodical when shooting film. It’s just poorfag mindset because they’re scared to burn film. Also there’s nothing particularly special of film renders, the lab developers use digital color profiles to give that particular “film” colors. Film is basically burning cigarettes versus vaping. People like it because of the analog, barbaric feel. That’s it.

>>4363405

Digital photography=90% sitting in front of a pc
Film photography=90% out taking photos.

You just have to learn to be more selective when to actually take a photo

>>4363406

Most people scan their own, only total beginners would have the lab scan the negatives so your point is invalid.

File: sony water damage.jpg (94 KB, 480x640)

94 KB JPG

>>4363193
I will never shoot with a SNOY
Im just not gonna!

>>4363409
if you've ever scanned your own negatives, which I do with my still functioning Nikon coolscan, then you'd know how soulless negatives are without post-processing. You're dishonest if you think negatives can stand on their own after scans.

>>4363409
Hot take from an amateur

>>4363412
>I won't shoot with a sony because I always drop my cameras directly into the ocean
Smart man!

>>4363418

A quick 5 second curve adjustment, it’s many times easier than getting a digital photo to look nice, or get a better scanner.

>>4363424

Plustek scanner owner actually, the amount you save paying for lab to scan means it’s free and I have no idea why anybody wouldn’t buy one.

>>4363429
>the amount you save
$2 a roll?

Wow I guess just 200 rolls and it pays for itself. Scanning at home is for MF/LF shooters, 35mm doesn't have high quality detail unless you shoot low ISO slides.

>>4363431

Move to Australia, you will be saving approx $20 per roll.
Your scanner is paid off in months.

>>4363435
especially black and white and if you push it. im not paying ~$30AUD when i can do it myself at home for a dollar or so. absolutely insane

>>4363429
can you post an example scan from it?

>>4363429
Plustek is amateur af. You aren’t saving anything with subpar scans.

>>4363483

Obviously a $5k scanner can do more but absolutely nobody on this site needs that.
A plustek does amazing scans and cost under $500.

>>4363496
Amateur mindset

>>4363531

$5k opportunity cost is massive. Imagine the photography gear I would miss out on to buy a $5k scanner

>>4363407
Implying you don't edit film scans LMAO

>>4363483
>>4363483
Why would you scan with a m43 sensor scanner, just shoot digital then for same results.

>>4363575
He meant to say 45% photography, 5% developing, 50% darkroom.

>>4363579
Where does 30% scanning and 60% applying insta filters come into equation?

>>4363407
>Pay people to develop photos
>Don't have to develop photos yourself

>Don't pay people to develop photos
>Have to develop photos yourself
Omg digital photography amirite?

>>4363589
>still have to develop digital scans again on top of paying someone to do it
Digital keeps winning

File: P9220554 1.jpg (204 KB, 480x640)

204 KB JPG

don't care. still shooting digital.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	43.40 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	17.00 mm
Image Width	480
Image Height	640
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard

>>4363496
>A plustek does amazing scans
You should post examples of your scans

>>4363610
Mush. Even your higher res shots look like mush. One day you may want to print a picture larger than a phone screen and you will be sorely dissapointed.

>>4363610
How deep did you crop? This looks like a 12mp phone camera

File: IMG_0425.jpg (269 KB, 598x361)

269 KB JPG

>>4363610
Om-5: $1099
Msucko 17mm f1.8: $349.99
Capture one perpetual: $299
You’re looking at a $1747.99 photograph, folks

A $1749.99 photograph that has worse detail rendering than a TEN megapixel d200 with 7 stops of dynamic range. This is barely ok on a phone, on a laptop or ipad its literal garbage that an iphone 15 or samsung galaxy could have shot better. Lol.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	144 dpi
Vertical Resolution	144 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	598
Image Height	361

>>4363610
>>4363667
Photos are fine. Perfectly servicable. You are making a big deal out of nothing. Stop samefag raging.

>>4363669
Looks worse than a $1000 phone.

Almost $1800 to take that. No way is fourturds THAT bad. You must have cropped half the image out after randomly snapshitting.

File: 20240331_0029_01.jpg (863 KB, 3580x3822)

863 KB JPG

>>4363610
What are you even doing m8, I know that these things are not FF resolution but that is worse than a digicam from 2006

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:09:23 10:26:31
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3580
Image Height	3822
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4363610
>can not compose a photo in a viewfinder
>crops 480x480 section of of 20mp file
"Crop your cropped crop for reach" was a joke not an instruction. Looks worse than most digishits.

>>4363673
>You
I didn't take it. Picture is fine. Go to optician, mate

>>4363685
>>4363661
>>4363684
>>4363673
>>4363667
samefag...

>>4363688
Wrong. You are being an extreme copefag.

>>4363686
Back in my day trolling meant something

>>4363689
As opposed to you I know something about photography. Picture is servicable.

>>4363697
>Hey kid, back in my day 480x640 would have filled two whole goddamn screens! i've printed 480x640 billboards, just stand further away idjit!
>^is blind

>>4363701
Mad because picture is better than your Fujifilm

>>4363697
You shoot with a toy camera. No one respects you.
You're like a midget saying he's good at basketball because you got some size 1 nike shoes to play in.

>>4363610
Loving the colors
>>4363667
It's more of a $1747 meltdown, money well spent to make you lose your shit like that lmao

>>4363709
>that is what tripfag calls "losing your shit"
Tripfag, if he's losing his shit you're in permanent tantrum mode.

That photo is awful, in basically every way. It's just random shrubs and dirt in some park and its permanently pixel peeped because someone can't compose a photo in the viewfinder

>>4363718
You call it random shrubs, I call it atmospheric. Like something you'd find in the works of surrealist auteur David Lynch.
Like Bresson used to say, "I'd rather people feel a film before understanding it".

>>4363724
>Like something you'd find in the works of surrealist auteur David Lynch
So when does mostly naked Sting walk out of the steam shower while a floating fan man laughs his ass off?

It's just a generic autism photo. Rocks and leaves in the most accessible suburban park-like wasteland.

File: Screenshot 2024-09-23 at (...).png (479 KB, 2218x1138)

479 KB PNG

>>4363669
:o

>>4363729
>can't appreciate a photo unless it's golden ratio rule of thirds properly weighted foreground background non-snoy coloured 3-day planned meticulously shot autism
Bruv, you can just like, enjoy a photo because you like it. No need to be a wanker because someone contributing to the board isn't Ren Kockwell tier. At least he's going outside and taking photos, ya fuckin knobgobber

File: P9220554 1.jpg (2.13 MB, 1620x2160)

2.13 MB JPG

>>4363666
just used a popular 4:3 resolution
>>4363661
I print regularity A3+ and am very happy with the results. I see those prints daily as I hang them on my walls.
>>4363667
see, when I was hiking through that nature preserve at 6 in the morning I took handheld snapshits with my OM-5. "ohhh nice trree. *snap* daaaayum that IBIS is great"
the only other people I encountered were other photographers. they had heavy gear backpacks with them. they took their FF cams with their thicc zooms out, put them on a tripod and stood there for god knows how long minmaxing bullshit and playing around with composition moving their tripod contraption by a few cm. by the time they pressed the shutter for the first time I had taken another 20 shots of 5 different trees in fog in the morning.
I had a blast. it was fun. and I was very happy. im the carI downloaded the SOOC jpgs directly to my phone and posted them on whatsapp status to get feedback once my numerous friends and family would be awake to tell me DUDE THOSE PICS LOOK AWESOME
I bet those FF tripod boomers are still dicking around in lightroom editing their first shot of the morning.
now try putting a price on this. you cant. also I got the om5 and the lens pretty cheap as it was used :)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	43.40 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	17.00 mm
Image Width	1620
Image Height	2160
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard

>>4363746
>Strawman
It's not a very good photo.

It's a cropped crop of an abandoned field.

here's some more you'd enjoy, knock yourself out
https://www.google.com/search?q=rocks+and+leaves+photography

>>4363750
Whats with micro four thirds users and the big cope essays accompanying a photo that looks like an iphones
>i took 20 shots of 5 different blurry trees
Based tripod boomers took 1 good one that doesn't need a cope essay to stand

File: P9220530.jpg (1.7 MB, 2160x1620)

1.7 MB JPG

>>4363718
>compose a photo in the viewfinder
not my game. I'm driven by instinct and I love to take snapshoots. if it looks good to me the shutter gets pressed

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	5.46 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	17.00 mm
Image Width	2160
Image Height	1620
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard

>>4363752
NTA. But isn't the whole point of photography to share the images you take? I'm all for people improving on their skills, but you're just being an aimless jackass. Offer some actual critque or fuck off onto /o/ or something.

File: P9220499.jpg (1.31 MB, 2160x1620)

1.31 MB JPG

>>4363753
I guess OM-5 users are more action oriented and more about the act of taking a photo. I'm an ISTP so maybe that's that. I don't really care for faggy theory bullshit - I just like to do shit.
The OM-5 is an adventurer's companion. Not some satanic soul stealing machine for sexual deviants who love to study charts.
People like you will never understand this as they are too afraid to live.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	14.06 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	17.00 mm
Image Width	2160
Image Height	1620
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard

>>4363534
Lab scans are billed on consumption.

>>4363759
>some satanic soul stealing machine for sexual deviants
I'm fucking sorry, where can I find one of these

File: P9220580.jpg (2.86 MB, 2160x1620)

2.86 MB JPG

>>4363758
the art is to just not give a shit about what nophotos tell you. if he would attach a photo to his "ure shit" post and I would think his photo is actually good I would consider his critique. but with him being a nophoto it's just ramblings of an autistic retard who's too afraid to go out with his camera

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	4.92 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	17.00 mm
Image Width	2160
Image Height	1620
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard

>>4363759
>McDonalds is good food, served fast. I love the taste of Mcdonalds.
>You must hate good food.
>I don't like to wait for my food.
>I've got better things to do than waste my life cooking food.

>>4363759
>>4363758
>>4363754
So much gearfag cope, but its just the same snapshots of grass every day

How many photos of grass does the world need? What are you accomplishing? What are you saying? Or are you just living the LARP, like someone walking around the safest woods in minnesota kitted out like a navy SEAL scout and saying "well im a prepared outdoorsman, see this is a glock and I bought this hat from REI"

>>4363759
>. I'm an ISTP
its that like being aids ridden and autistic or what

>>4363765
>nophoto
>nocritique
>yelling vaguely about gear
Brother get a job. Or maybe buy a camera since you're so hung up on a photography board with no photos to share.

File: P9220456 1.jpg (2.67 MB, 1620x2160)

2.67 MB JPG

>>4363765
I'm not sorry for enjoying myself :)
>>4363766
no, it's astrology for men. look it up

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OM Digital Solutions
Camera Model	OM-5
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	4.66 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	17.00 mm
Image Width	1620
Image Height	2160
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard

>>4363769
He is proudly nophoto. He considers himself a photo critic and believes he deserves to sit at the big boys table.

>>4363769
>Nocritique
It's snapshits of foggy grass repeated ad infinitum. Do you critique gearfagreview's sample galleries or write them off as snapshits?

>>4363773
anon you seem a bit mad. maybe take a photo it always helps me feel better

>>4363765
he is living the larp

these people will never engage in street photography because they are afraid of people, even though a single photo taken in civilization is more poignant and compelling than the rocks and leaves that never change

every photo you fags take of yosemite looks the same but every photo you take in the streets of LA will look different hour to hour... but they're afraid of people.

Guys look out, the freshest mft thread on the board is here and everyone is schizoing out over it

File: P1030330.jpg (269 KB, 1106x762)

269 KB JPG

>>4363779
we truly live in a society

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-GF5
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.2.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2023:03:11 22:43:08
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	160
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: DSC_7585.jpg (2.64 MB, 3024x2012)

2.64 MB JPG

>>4363779
>street photography
the jewish kind of photography

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON Z 6_2
Camera Software	Capture One 23 Macintosh
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	40 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	360
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	40.00 mm
Image Width	3024
Image Height	2012
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4363784
Amazing how mft's quality issues literally dont matter as soon as you go somewhere with people, lol

Rocks and leaves magnify specs faggotry but no one cares how sharp and noiseless an emotionally and philosophically significant street photo is. Looking at blades of grass... versus thinking about the human condition.

>>4363785
Have you ever noticed this one weird thing about politics?
Bigoted far right fucks are never, ever, EVER decent artists. Ever. They may be excellent scientists, they may be speechmakers, they may be software developers or mathematicians, but they are totally incapable of creativity in the visual and musical arts.

>>4363787
I have noticed that the white man enjoys nature and the outdoors. Thus nature photography is white photography.

Jews enjoy photographing people because as a parasitic subrace they feel attraction to host species. It's like if wolves somehow enjoyed photographing sheep.

>arts
you mean degenerate postmodernist jewish arts only created so jews could corner the art market and sell literal shit to idiots with too much money? of course no one with a sense for aesthetics would get involved with that. classical art is white. modern """""art"""" is jewish.

>>4363791
Street photography was invented by white men (specifically the scottish and french). Photography in general was, really. Originally, the primary purpose as portraiture, and street is just everyday portraiture, a portrait of the act of being a living human being. So your post is antisemitic nonsense.

May mossad's pagers find their way into your gear bag, inshallah.

>>4363794
stop coping, cryptojew

File: Clown-camera.jpg (36 KB, 640x398)

36 KB JPG

>how it started: micro four thirds
>how it's going: holocaust denial

Oh boy this thread has everything
>filmfagging
>jews
>crypto
>MFTurds
>gearfagging
>food analogy
>"samefag"
>the white man
Fuckin christ.

>>4363800
Did the food analogy mac you hungry? I'm sorry.

>>4363804
>Mac
Yes I need some blue box Mac n cheese right godamn now

>>4363799
I'm really sad it didn't happen

>>4363787
Almost like the leftist stranglehold into the art world has made it impossible to make it unless you mask your views, crazy how that works huh. I don't avoid posting my work here for nothing.
Even the low tier publishers you have to be on the lookout for, they are the gatekeepers who compile the blacklists of up and coming talent. Hollywood being so filled with pozz is no coincidence, and it's self-perpetuating.

>>4363806
Boxed Mac is the mft of the Mac and cheese world. Now I want a burger.

>>4363814
You can make apolitical art and keep your mouth shut but for some reason they never do

The brutal rationality needed to say that you hate 5 billion people because "muh future of human capability" also robs you of your ability to communicate in fundamentally human ways like art.

>>4363816
Yes they do, you're just looking at the ones who can't keep it to themselves. Every now and then another one snaps, often while drunk and all the intelligentsia becomes simultaneously horrified by the discovery and bloodthirsty for his career. And it doesn't even have to be right wing, it's enough to oppose part of their agenda. Just look at that druggy dumb nigger Kanye, he called them out and his life has become a bigger mess than it was before. Don't be surprised if they suicide him.

>>4363818
They already did

>>4363193
yes but why would anyone really care?
Telling digital shooters: no shit same here
Telling film shooters: kay, nice to meet you and forget you I guess. ?

why can't we all just get along ;_;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjNjtKlFCnc

>>4363829
because of jews poisoning our societies

>>4363845
>IT'S DA JOOOOOOOOS

>>4363829
No body actually cares about anyone else's photos. Taking photos is a private endeavor, there is no reason to interact with anyone else about photography except to argue. Not getting along IS the social component of the hobby.

>>4364083
Should I care about photos in galleries and photo books?

>starts with film vs digital
>eventually becomes format size war
why is it always like this

Why is everyone being such an elitist faggot? Who cares what you shoot with if you're just having fun?

>>4367082
How will I feel superior to people when my mft sensor is no bigger than my right nut?

>>4363193
>art history student
AKA future homeless woman/camwhore/Antifa terrorist. I'd have included burger flipper but they are all Indians now.

>>4364090
Only the good ones
>>4367082
Because 90% of people on /p/ don't own a camera and only come here to brandfag/formatfag
>>4367086
>they're all indians now
Many such cases