[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_0971.gif (54 KB, 220x261)
54 KB
54 KB GIF
>color science
>>
>film simulation
>>
>film recipe
>>4364114
This one is extra egregious
>>
>film scans
>>
>>4363835
>creamy bokeh
>>
>>4363835
>G-Master quality
>>
>>4363835
>film
>>
>straight out of camera
>>
>lens rendering
>>
>film grain
>>
>soft at the corners
>>
>>4364141
clive spotted
>>
>>4363835
>FULLY manual
>>
>>4363835
>this old camera
>>
>>4364196
>FROM JAPAN
>>
>clive
>>
>>4364154
To be fair, Canon colors look nicer even to the untrained eye.
>>
>scanning film
>>
>>4364207
Wrong.
>>
>>4364207
>untrained eye
>>
>vintage
>>
>>4364237
>character
>>
>>4364145
>filmlike
>>
File: shoots like film.png (1.1 MB, 1116x1749)
1.1 MB
1.1 MB PNG
>shoots like film
>>
>>4364327
i feel nothing but hate
>>
>>4364327
>G12
>$12
Where?
WHERE?
>>
>pushing portra 400
>>
>>4364334
It's over
>>
File: sony water damage.jpg (94 KB, 480x640)
94 KB
94 KB JPG
>weather sealing
>>
>>4364410
They literally dropped it in the ocean, but when someone says their olympus had a dial/button fail after light rain “U LIE THEY MUST HAVE TRIED TAKING PHOTOS UNDERWATER” lmao

Anti sony shills are so stupid they make me want a sony. It must be great if they’re threatened enough to misrepresent and lie all the time.
>>
>advantages of mirrorless
>>
>sony shill
>>
>>4364413
It is. People legitimately feel like they need to "fight against sony" here like it could drive their favorite brand out of business or something (it already nearly did, RIP nikon)
>>
File: s03SOu45fm69j29vd9s.jpg (1.03 MB, 2560x1708)
1.03 MB
1.03 MB JPG
>flagship pancake lens

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-7RM3
Camera SoftwarephotoWORKS23
Photographerjaesun_riu
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)32 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution350 dpi
Vertical Resolution350 dpi
Image Created2024:09:05 11:15:41
Exposure Time1/4000 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating100
Brightness10.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length32.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2560
Image Height1708
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationHigh
SharpnessNormal
GPS StatusMeasurement Interoperability
Geodetic Survey DataWGS-84
GPS Differential CorrectionNo Correction
>>
>>4364434
>its actually an ultra-budget samyang that markets itself as a film simulator
Do you ever get sick of it?
>>
>>4364436
>ultra-budget
>$500
>>
>film simulator
>>
>>4364447
$350 for the main housing and 3 different classic point and shoot lenses.

Sony already had two "flagship pancakes" (35mm f2.8s) that were roughly the same size as the z 26 with its mandatory hood. Sony hasn't made one since. The more feature-complete muffin lenses outsold them.
>>
File: 8173820.jpg (812 KB, 1590x1614)
812 KB
812 KB JPG
>"flagship pancakes"
>>
>>4364468
>oh no, the lens is longer than my penis!
how gearfag do you have to be to care
>>
>informal fallacy
>>
>classic point and shoot lenses
>>
>>4364473
>points out that a flagship pancake lens is not in fact a flagship pancake lens
>start talking about penises
I knew Sony ponies were raging homosexuals but this is a leap
>>
>>4364530
“Same length as the z 26mm with the mandatory hood” is true. If your prime lens has to get a fragile dust/water pumping erection to focus and doesnt have filter threads its not a whole lens.

Nikon did not make a pancake. They split a shitty muffin in two to make a marketing claim.
>>
File: sexo.jpg (283 KB, 800x600)
283 KB
283 KB JPG
>>4364531
>always the same weird mental gymnastics spiel
Keep on coping
>>
>>4364327
>the same guy trying to make the video 3 times
>>
>>4364540
>no filter threads without hood
>no weather sealing without hood and filter
>fragile slow focusing noisy focus breathing pos that vignettes 3 stops
at least its short in its most fragile and least useful configuration
>>
>>4364545
Aaand that’s why sony didn’t make one. This lens can not shoot video. A basic task that these incels will surely seethe at because video is for people with friends.
>>
>>4364545
>fragile slow focusing noisy focus breathing pos that vignettes 3 stops
Please dont talk about Sony's flagship pancake lens like that >>4364434
>>
its pretty insane how mentioning sony and pancake can just derail any thread on this board
>>
>>4364548
So you admit nikons $500 lens cant outdo samyangs toy lens? Bravo
>>
>>4364550
Derail? Bullshit is the literal topic, theme, and lifeblood of this thread
>>
>>4364552
yes thats why the bundled lens with their $2000 zf is an entirely plastic one lol
>at least it focuses internally and silently
>>
File: rentfree.gif (2.56 MB, 933x720)
2.56 MB
2.56 MB GIF
>>4364550
>>
>>4364553
Of this entire websight tbqhwy
>>
>In today's video, I'm gonna show you how to pull portra 800
>>
>brand ambassador
>>
>a building corner
>>
>>4363835
I read the fuck out of color theory in college and never once did any of it talk about frequency ranges of the hues in question. Every time I asked anyone why they don’t just use the fucking frequency, I got “hm, I never heard of anyone even mentioning it as an idea, maybe we will someday.” Welcome to my niggawat.
>>
>>4364531
If you’re using the pointless hod you must be Ken Rockwell. There’s no reason to use that. The lens is about 1/4” in diameter, sits below a plastic edge, and retracts when not shooting and it has a slip cap that pops on and off so smoothly and efficiently & only adds about .8mm to the stack height, you’ll never use the hood or a filter on that lens unless ur a total putz.
>>
>>4364602

Colour science can only ever be done correctly with physical objects like chemicals or paints.
Anything using rgb pixels is clearly bullshit a colour is not a red green and blue light close together trying to look like a colour.
A colour is a physical object reflecting light.
>>
>Full frame
>>
>Zeiss 3D pop
>>
>>4364626
i don't like that pop desu, i like my pics flat and non 3d
>>
>>4364680
It's a placebo term.
>>
>>4364625
The best sensor size because of all the autists that seethe over it
>>
colorspace non calibrated
>>
>>4364626
it's real. once i got a zeiss pro zoom i knew it was true
>>
>>4364716
It was always true but not exclusive to Zeiss these days mainly because Zeiss doesn't exist anymore, it's Cosina playing both sides of the Pop market
Also some Nikkor lenses and old EF Canon glass
>>
File: B0185378-y720px.jpg (118 KB, 480x720)
118 KB
118 KB JPG
>street photography

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelPENTAX K-3
Camera Softwaredarktable 2.0.3
PhotographerAndrew Wade Eglington oh-hi.info
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)147 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Image Created2017:04:01 19:13:48
Exposure Time1/320 sec
F-Numberf/6.3
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating500
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length98.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width480
Image Height720
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastHard
SaturationLow
SharpnessHard
Subject Distance RangeDistant View
>>
>>4364622
Yeah most of it was based in paints since it’s all been about paints wayyy longer than digital’s take on it. The number of paint ppl that had to be reminded that hue didn’t originate in the bauhaus or the pantone lab, it is a result of the specific frequency ranges of light reflecting off it, was shocking.
>>
>>4364722
0 color
0 sharpness
0 style
0 composition
everything about your snapshit is miserable
>>
>>4364734
>0 sharpness
>0 style
Check your eyes homo
>>
>>4364743
buy glasses old fart
>>
>>4364745
read some theory toddler
>>
>unexpected boner in public
>>
>>4364682
nah it's real, compare the canon ef 85mm 1.8 usm and Nikon z 85 1.8s, the difference is night and day, Nikon really has a 3d pop and Canon don't, 3d pop is ugly and unnecessary
>>
File: Untitled1692_1.jpg (2.54 MB, 4096x3168)
2.54 MB
2.54 MB JPG
>>4364722
do you even know you posted a thumbnail or you don't understand resolution?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4096
Image Height3168
>>
>>4364685
"Full frame" is not a sensor size
>>
>>4364327
I really hate that bald pedo moustache motherfucker.
>>
>Digital is the same as film because I could only take 36 photos if I wanted to.
>>
>>4365018
Its called a smaller sd card
but if you’re not poor you can shoot as much film as you want, really. garry winogrand shot several rolls a day.
>one exposure per motive
>behold my thought out masterpiece
>HOT DOG STAND - JAPAN
>missed focus wtf?<-forgot he tried handholding 1/15
>>
>>4364941
Full frame is a sensor size.

A fuji gfx is large format.
>>
>>4365018
>film is the same as digital because I can shoot countless rolls of film per day

Do you see how retarded you are?
>>
>>4364552
Well, it’s $300, and with a 26mm focal length and all its sharpness weighted at the center, it’s for selfies. …that look 1000x better than a crappy cellphone pic. …that and being able to pocket your big Z7, given that you use the slip cap for the lens instead of the big dumb hood, and that you take the rubber eyepiece of the rear of your vf. It’s fine, still whips the fuck out of practically every lens made before 2018, but is just not as premium as Nik’s current ultra sharp beasts.
>>
>halation
>>
File: sony bricks.jpg (38 KB, 986x346)
38 KB
38 KB JPG
>firmware updates
>>
>>4365035
>A fuji gfx is large format
Nigga it ain’t even the smallest accepted medium format lmao the fuck kinda crack you on
>>
File: Sony-FE-35mm-F2-8-ZA.jpg (206 KB, 1600x1200)
206 KB
206 KB JPG
>>4364458
>Sony already had two "flagship pancakes" (35mm f2.8s)
fucking retard lol

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelSLT-A99V
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)70 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2021-07-18T15:05:28-07:00
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/16.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/16.0
Brightness3.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length70.00 mm
Image Width1600
Image Height1200
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
All the seethe at sony just tells me they’re good cameras. If say, nikon were better we would be seeing daily seething about some recalls, some quality issues, some cripple hammering, and some firmware bug or broken camera. Where are the daily screenshots of ken rockwell getting a Z with an EVF? Where are all the “oh no no no” memes with screenshots of forum posts and articles about broken canons? Like this?

https://fstoppers.com/reviews/hey-canon-why-are-your-cameras-falling-apart-636447
Maybe nikon and canon just arent cool enough to make talentless and nophotonerds mad.

things to seethe about with other brands definitely happened but only sony gets the hate. Therefore sony must somehow jive with good photographers, which makes bad photographers (/p/) mad jealous. Like how /g/ is always angry at macbooks.
>>
>Sony Shooter



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.