>Sony can't make FF pancake lense-ACK!GET IN HERE SONY CHADS WE ARE SO FUCKING BACK
>(sony) were very surprised with their (pancake lenses) popularity onlinelmao some snoy faggot employee is browsing /p/ as we speak on company time
canon sisters how we will cope now?
>>4366808No, two sonyalpharumors faggots are browsing /p/One of them is clive, the frantic sony hater who makes like 5 threads about how much he hates sony over stupid irrelevant shit each day.The other is probably the owner and mod of that worthless gearfag site.Clive is frantically spamming every bad thing to ever happen to a sony camera for any reason and bitching about it missing some shitty toy lenses. Next on his agenda is definitely snoy lacking a 200-800 f12-16.Back in the real world actual photographers are grabbing their canons and snoys and just... shooting. Because sony is such a ridiculously popular brand that just one of their bodies outsold panasonic and fujifilm combined.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4366806kek you people are so tarded, I have Snoy, Fagji, Canngr... and I do not care.
>>4366815the top two sony and canon models combined outsold nikon, panasonic, fujifilm, and pentax/ricoh combined.it really puts the odd dead camera from them in perspective>hey canon y ur camera falling apart? i heard this from THREE ppl nao!>3 lemons out of 3 million isn't bad.
>>4366806based af I will buy it day 1
>>4366839anon, a snoy obsessed gearcel made that in photoshop because he's in a lifelong troll war with the gearcel that runs snoy rumors.the worst part is both of them post here.
Making more seething photoshops, Clive? Is there anything that you do that isn't seething at Sony?
>>4366806You'd think that Clive with his amazing photoshopping skills would at least be able to make the "NEW" tag consistent with the rest of the image, but it seems he's been seething a bit too hard in the process.
>>4366808>snoy shooter is an obsessed gearcel that spends all their time seething and ranting on the internet instead of taking photographsChecks out
>>4367047>Clive is such an obsessed snoyhater that he spends hours of each day creating images depicting snoyshooters and spends hours on the internet trolling sites dedicated to snoygear seething about snoy cameras and snoy lenses that he will never buy
>>4367073>Leo AtreidesThe pawdishah emperor strikes again
Clive desperately wants an a7cii in his pocket huh>sony look PLEASE MAKE MY PANCAME
>>4367078Should have got a Canon
>>4367119Canon doesn't make a modern body small enough to benefit from a pancake. Only the dead and dated EOS M lineup knew such joys.
>>4367169Wish they would make a photo-centric compact high megapickles camera.
>>4367119Or Nikon/Fujifilm/Panasonic/Olympus/Leica/Pentax
>>4367186>bodies too large, pancake is an overpriced toy>apscope xtranny>bodies too large or mfoolturds, f8 fixed or foolturd trash>foolturds>no autofocus>dlsaarSo no one has made a good ff mirrorless pancake that autofocuses without buzzing and extending? Only compromised cope lenses?
>>4366899You know they reuse designs right?
>>4367186>Nikon's pancakeNo small bodies. Actual garbage lens. Should have been $150, or 10mm longer and built normally.>Fujicrop, xtrans>PanasonicNo good cameras>OlympusNo good cameras>LeicaFilm mount, doesn't support autofocus>PentaxDSLR, a pancake doesn't make it any smaller.
>>4366813by knowing that my canon ef-m 22mm is f/2 and not f/2.8
>>4367283Why tf did they release the best compact aps-c 35mm eq. lens ever and not make it in R mount as they did it with other EF-M leftovers? Why their R-mount crop bodies are ugly huge hunks of plastic when they clearly can make beautiful compact bodies? Even Nikon with their enormous mount managed to make a relatively pocketable body (Z30). Do they really want wedding and sport toilers to be their ONLY customers?
>>4367190Pancakes are not designed to operate like a giant IF lens, they're designed for convenience
>>4367310Because Canon make the most anti-consoomer decisions possible to appease their "proffeshional" market-base. Why buy the 28mm f/2.8 when you can spend 2x and get the 24mm f/1.8 IS? Why buy the RF 24-105mm that caps out at f/7.1 at 85mm when you can spend 3x as much and get the RF 24-105mm L f/4? Canon purposefully kneecaps their consumer-grade shit, and I reckon they looked at the sales numbers for the M lineup and lenses and realised it was cutting into their mid-grade and above profits.
>>4367315It's not even about pro stuff. It seems like they just hate making small and pretty things. Like, for example, snoy a7cr is clearly a professional camera, but it's not fuckhueg and actually had a designer working on it in this millenium. Canon insists on making 80's bubbling tires, no matter the price category.
>>4367317Is this bait? The a7c cameras are some of the ugliest bricks ever made.
>>4367224Spoken like a true autistic nophoto
>>4367334Sure, it's not peak sex like pentax k-70, but not a single one non-ef-m canon comes even close to it.
>>4366815>>4366899>>4366903>>4367073Can someone answer who the FUCK is Clive?? What's his trip?
>>4367351Me
>>4367417Why are you bullying and upsetting snoyboys?
>>4367351He works at IHOP because he wants to make the perfect pancakes.
>>4367426At this point he's upsetting everyone with his disturbing sony obsession. It's like he wants to buy a snoy and is begging snoy, inc to fix the one little autistim niggle that's still bothering his mental illness.if he's faking pancake lens rumors? it's really starting to look like he wants a snoy and for snoy, inc to make his pancake.
>>4367351see >>4359570
>>4367351Clive has never posted here.
>>4368449Some autist pretending to be him is even worseThen again you need to be insane to hate sony like this. They make the best cameras and lenses.
You don't need anything faster than f8 in real world use.
>>4368471
>>4368471real world use basically means building corners and trees on this board, i know because they keep saying you dont need autofocus or shutter speeds over 1/30>>4367746>jannies got sony hate thread number>*checks*>SIXWhen will be rid of this retard? It's starting to look less like genuine opinions and more like an advertising campaign. But what's he actually shilling for?Probably panasonic. Despite having a whole two panasonic users /p/ gets huge flurries of threads (with heavy amounts of sony hate) whenever panasonic releases something. panasonic is also extremely unreliable with a lot of unresolved issues, but /p/ doesn't just not mention them, if you bring them up, you're shouted down with "this one sony (1/5,500,000) broke!" and its usually abuse like water immersion.
>>4368481i, too, remember "the s5ii is out, sony is going to die, sony is shit, its over for SNOY, snoy is garbage, sell your snoy and buy a panasonic, panasonic won, snoy is dying, snoy is garbage, snoy is for cucks, buy the panasonic, its more than youll ever need, its better, snoy snoy snoy snoy"Then in 2 weeks it was all gone (shills were recalled) until the g9ii was released and we got literally 10 threads claiming it was better than full frame, specifically sony
>>4368481>>4368482Meds
>>4368703>>4368704>two medsposts in two anti-sony shill threads made within 1 minute and 1 second of eachothersomeone said something a little too true for our lil' spammer
>>4368716Yes, snoy simpers need to take their meds daily
