File: IMGP0343.jpg (1.62 MB, 3872x2592)

1.62 MB JPG

I have a plenty of pentax glass with k-mount I bought for my DSLR and a whole bunch of m42 lenses while I never had a pentax film camera.
Which one is the one to get? So far I've done a little reading and choice seems to be between either MX or LX. Are there any other models to be on the lookout for?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX Corporation
Camera Model	PENTAX K10D
Camera Software	K10D Ver 1.00
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	450 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:04:14 09:50:44
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3872
Image Height	2592
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Close View

File: Fuji Velvia 100-23 copy.jpg (3.39 MB, 1667x2500)

3.39 MB JPG

>>4367132
The MX would be a better option over the LX unless you find a really good condition LX. Feature wise the LX is tempting, but its a fickle camera with a lot of expensive things to go wrong. Love mine, but an MX is just a safer bet. The MZ-S is good if you don't mind the modern styling aswell.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3 Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.5.1 (Macintosh)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	154 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:01 17:53:18
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1667
Image Height	2500
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Macro

I've been looking at an MZ-S for a few months now.
Trick me into buying it.

>>4367384
it prints the shutter and aperture info between the sprocket holes

if I didnt have to pay for a trip to a friend's wedding id be holding one with a battery grip rn and planning on shooting some sports with my 150-450

>>4367387
how is the autocofus compared to the old EOS film bodies for example?
I don't own any autofocus cameras at the moment. I shoot even birds with a 300mm with manual focus.

>>4367390
It's okay, not amazing, but it's there from what i've heard. There's a few videos on youtube by people who used them for work etc back in the early 2000s I think that mention it being reliable but not fast

>>4367112 (OP)
Seems like Clive is so desperate for attention he's making fake Pentax threads to shill Pentax pancakes. They are for DSLR so it doesn't make them smaller. Imagine being so pathetic you hate on Sony this much. How miserable is your life Clive?

>>4367382
copped MX not long after posting, once I read more in depth about the issues that may affect LX
looking forward to using it

>>4367397
shut up clive

>>4367397
I know right its truly sad and pathetic to be a Sony hater. Any comment trashing Sony is posted by Clive. Guy probably works at an IHOP making pancakes.

File: light_purple.jpg (3.49 MB, 5921x4000)

3.49 MB JPG

Now that the old thread is gone, I'll continue with the rest of the outdoor pictures.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4367112 (OP)
Almost bought a K-3 III. I keep resisting the purchase button. It's dumb as hell, but something in me just kind of got sick of EVF's. No pretentious artistry crap about 'it's the real light', I just don't want to stare at another screen.

What lenses do you recommend?

>>4369632
Any given DA limited lenses really
The 40mm f2.8 xs Über pancake for keks

>>4367397
Stop trying to derail legitimate threads Colin

>>4369753
Any specific lenses that stand out? Debating picking one up off of Amazon, that way I can return it, if I don’t like it.

>>4370271
The 43mm f1.9 limited comes to mind

File: PICT8130_v1.jpg (511 KB, 1800x1200)

511 KB JPG

Recent pic with minor edits. I shot this one in raw for a change.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	34784
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1800
Image Height	1200
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2024:10:03 19:51:59
Exposure Time	10 sec
F-Number	f/13.0
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Image Width	1800
Image Height	1200
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Soft
Subject Distance Range	Close View

>>4369632
>It's dumb as hell, but something in me just kind of got sick of EVF's.
I feel the same way, but for me it's kind of pretentious: A DSLR feels like it's capturing an image once you see it on the back screen, instead of taking a screencap of the EVF stream. Especially if you use electronic shutter and burst modes with the mirrorless camera. Unfortunately I'm stuck with mirrorless because I bought the lenses.
>>4371540
Nice capture but the subject does nothing for me

File: 53996961506_01724dcd23_k.jpg (661 KB, 2048x1367)

661 KB JPG

It's hilarious how good the K1 is with Pixel Shift but i have never been convinced about the glass in terms of price and variety.
If i ever get one i think of a kit composed of 15-30 f2.8, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8, FA Limited 21, 43 and 77 and maybe the 50mm f1.4 Golden Star... yet there's no cheap 200-5/600 f5.6 and no cheap f2.8 and below after the 85mm range, or at least cheap compared to Nikon/Canon, because the difference between a Nikkor 180 f2.8 and the Pentax version is just too much.
Also the old lenses have soft rubber rings, come on now. It's been years and the glass just isn't convincing.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Photographer	ZEGABY
Image-Specific Properties:

File: 1721525499786511.jpg (398 KB, 1280x1707)

398 KB JPG

>>4371653
There's no subject

redpill me on the monochrome dslr

>>4371869
You can't see the corner of the building in that pic?

File: PICT8039.jpg (528 KB, 1728x1152)

528 KB JPG

>>4373074
Most of my pics have no subject

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:09:28 17:51:56
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Creative
ISO Speed Rating	140
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Low
Sharpness	Soft
Subject Distance Range	Close View

>>4371729
The K1 is the best digital camera ever made and it's being buried by the lack of good lenses.

>>4373221
Every image has a salient features though. Even this one I would say it's the orange looking tree

>>4373221
>Most of my pics have no subject
That's literally impossible but a great cope for not thinking about your compositions

File: birdhouse.jpg (4.62 MB, 6000x4000)

4.62 MB JPG

>>4369040
I forgot I had posted that picture in the last thread. This one's new. f5.6

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: compositionbabble.jpg (330 KB, 900x600)

330 KB JPG

>>4373221
>no subject
Wrong, your subject (green zone) is clearly the trail and the background (second red zone) compliments it due to leading lines pointing or going parallel with the leading line of the subject (shown in orange pointers) like the water body and the other trail, trees all give pauses and framing, including the ones in the foreground (first red zone).
If we could see the water body more clearly, as in no vegetation to cover it, it would be much nicer. But there is a subject, not wanting to see it means lack of discerning theory or >>4373241 a coping mechanism.

File: PICT8321.jpg (486 KB, 1728x1152)

486 KB JPG

Leaves in motion

>>4373581
Nice scene

>>4371729
Majestic. Not sure about the tree in the foreground.

>>4373588
Thanks for your detailed analysis. Next time I'm there I might go for a close-up on the stone light fixture thing near the middle.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:15 19:40:57
Exposure Time	1/350 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: pentax-k1-ii-j-limited-01(...).jpg (138 KB, 1180x1009)

138 KB JPG

Can you or can you not disable the RAW denoising "feature" of the K-1 II?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 22.2 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2021:02:26 13:29:20
Comment	Screenshot
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1180
Image Height	1009

>>4378196
Why disable it if it gives less noise?

>>4378551
All raw cooking causes artefacts when pushing shadows to avoid bracketing faggortry or when stacking for astro

File: pinku.jpg (4.44 MB, 5539x4000)

4.44 MB JPG

>>4373581
f11, but I wish it was a little lower so the pines were a little less prominent

>>4378196
I can't say 100%, but I think it's inherent to the accelerator unit and I saw a post from 2018 that it wasn't a switchable option and it was never mentioned in the firmware update summaries

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: PICT8501.jpg (527 KB, 1728x1152)

527 KB JPG

My vintage screw-mount 50mm isn't very sharp at max aperture. The pictures are quite hazy. Do the newer (K-mount) 50mm lenses like the DA50, F/FA50, HD FA50, etc produce sharper results?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:20 20:07:19
Exposure Time	1/180 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: wiz f1.8 da50 k70.jpg (4.24 MB, 4000x6000)

4.24 MB JPG

>>4378580
This is handheld f1.8 with the plastic da50 with the k70. The focus was on the eye.

I think there is a little softness at max aperture based off this and a couple of other test pictures. I posted a f1.8 test pic with the same lens of some silverware in a blue cup from my kx in a previous thread. It also had a little softness.

It's hard to tell against the screw mount without a direct comparison. I think the bokeh may be smoother with the da50.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4378558
>i can't compose so no one can
Get good scrub

>>4378847
>You need to follow some pretentious and arbitrary set a rules so that your photos look like everyone else's photos!!!

>>4378551
because it's extremely retarded to do anything raw related in camera
it gets outdated before the camera is even released lmao
especially with denoising
remember when profiled denoising wasn't a thing?
remember when AI denoising (which is just a profiled denoising on steroids really) wasn't a thing?

File: noiseaccelerator.jpg (90 KB, 1287x630)

90 KB JPG

>>4378551
Destroys the image quality at high ISO or when recovering shadows, there's loads of videos showcasing this, the most common effect is purple tinging.
There's a reason Pentax fags swear by the original K1, II only had the added bonus of having japanese-only special editions that are rad as fuck. And also purple.

>>4378973
>pretentious and arbitrary set a rules
There's no rules, only possibilities which are seen more and more depending on taste and experience, both given by watching photos and taking photos, both which also evade you due to not doing it.

File: IMG15434.jpg (1.01 MB, 2400x1920)

1.01 MB JPG

>>4378855
what, people aren't allowed to take photos of their cute figures?
>>4379379
>the most common effect is purple tinging
interesting, my mk1 also does this, but also only when pushed really hard
I don't have a mk2 to compare it against to see if it's just blatantly more obvious with that one

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-1
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	63 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:10:19 23:28:15
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	Flash
Focal Length	63.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2400
Image Height	1920
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Close View

>>4379441
Some mk. I bodies were retrofit with the mk. II sensor, if you bought it used or refurbished then it's probably the same problem, if not then you push it extremely hard.

File: Screenshot 2024-10-29 at (...).png (548 KB, 1014x282)

548 KB PNG

>>4379447
bought used but pretty sure it doesn't have the II sensor, since I only start seeing it start to creep in around effective ISO 51200
picrel is ISO 20000 +1EV w/ vignette correction for the D FA 24-70 2.8 which iirc is at least 1 stop in the corners

>>4378551
>>4378554
kinda similar problem to snoyny star eater

>>4379447
check where the symbol that says SR is. if it has a "II" in its place then it's had the guts switched out

File: IMGP4587.jpg (3.46 MB, 3264x4928)

3.46 MB JPG

Does anyone have any strong opinions about the K-5 vs the K-7? I want to pick up one of them. I've been wanting a weather sealed crop body for a travel camera. I have the K-01, and I quite like the sensor and it is basically the same sensor as the K-5. But part of me wants to experiment with the older sensor.

I am also looking at two lenses, the Pentax SMC Pentax-DA 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 ED AL DC WR and the Pentax-HD Pentax DA 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 ED DC WR

I'm temped to go with the 18-135, it's smaller, lighter, and cheaper. I'm not particularly fussed about image quality and I doubt I'll use the wider fov, but the 16-85 is only like ~$30 more.

Thoughts?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-01
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 14.0.1 (Windows)
Photographer	EDERN FULUP
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	57 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	141 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	141 dpcm
Image Created	2024:10:31 01:53:44
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	8000
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	37.50 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: PICT6478.jpg (484 KB, 1728x1152)

484 KB JPG

No comment about those lenses. But I like the K-7 a lot. I've had it for about 1 year. K-5 is a newer model, so maybe it has lower noise at high ISOs

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	79 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:24 22:22:05
Exposure Time	1/90 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Creative
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	53.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

>>4380145
Ironically I was considering the K-7 Because it'd be noisier I've started shooting all my digital bodies around 400-800 iso because I like a little noise in my images. But I was also really impressed with my K-01 at 8000, considering. I did find a good deal on a K-5 on ebay, so I put I bid in. If that doesn't work out, maybe I'll look more at the K-7

File: Voigt282_06.jpg (50 KB, 802x253)

50 KB JPG

Are there premium manual focus lenses for K mount? I've used a few Voigtlanders and Zeiss lenses over the years and I'm getting a hankering for them again but looking around it doesn't look like either company really made lenses for the mount. on ebay there are a few Zeiss lenses, but they are wildly overpriced. So what are my options? Should I adapt from another mount?

>>4379543
did you mean to reply to >>4379455 ?
and yes I know about that, mine has all the markings for a non-upgraded mk1
so unless someone got the mk2 board upgrade but not the updated markings, I bought a standard mk1 (which is what I intended to buy)

File: PICT8659.jpg (530 KB, 1728x1152)

530 KB JPG

>>4378669
I think mine has a different level of sharpness depending on the subject distance. Close up ones look quite okay with +1 or +2 sharpness set in camera.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:03 01:19:55
Exposure Time	0.7 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: PICT8485.jpg (519 KB, 1728x1152)

519 KB JPG

>>4380762
But if the subject is farther away it doesn't look too good.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:20 20:00:06
Exposure Time	1/350 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Low
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: PICT8478.jpg (515 KB, 1728x1152)

515 KB JPG

>>4380763
Comparison

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:20 19:59:52
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Low
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

>>4380406
voightlander makes/made k mout lenses, i think zeiss did too. there are some nice small modernish colour-skopar voightlanders in native k.
there is a way to convert nikon zeiss to k mount, its called zk mount. there was a boomer on pentax forums who was in to it.
seems like a waste of time to me when the limiteds are better in everyway except artificial benchmarks and clout. especially if you are paying zeiss money, just get a second camera

File: IMGP9628_toned.jpg (659 KB, 662x1000)

659 KB JPG

The brotherhood of the solenoid failure

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-30
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:02 20:38:56
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	662
Image Height	1000

File: yellow_and_ants.jpg (4.72 MB, 5000x4000)

4.72 MB JPG

>>4380763
That close up looks pretty sharp, but it does seem something's off with the far focus. It seems like some area should be sharp.

I took some more pictures in my living room with the K-70 from farther away 10-15 ft and I would say it was equivalent to what you see with the figure with the light softness, but no drastic changes. The figure picture gives a good idea of what to expect.

I also tried with the K-X and I was having a lot more trouble with the focus, but at least one of the f1.8 looked similar.

Probably any of the new 50s would be sharper just because it looks like something's off. The macro 50 is sharp at 2.8, its widest aperature.

>>4378570
f6.3 This turned out to be interesting with the ants, but I probably took it from the wrong angle.

>>4379955
Used? That seems like either a bad price for the 18-135 or a deal for the 16-85.
Based off what you said, it seems like the 50mm reach difference might be the thing to consider.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4381269
>Used?
yes, used. I was mistaken though, it was like a $50 difference. The 18-135's go for about $150, there was a copy of the 16-85 on mpb for $200 with no hood, I should have grabbed it because now it's gone. I think the extra telephoto reach on the 18-135 wouldn't be used. But it is a smaller lens which is appealing to me, I'm not picky about optical quality. I guess it's just a matter of 'which do I buy first'. I want to try them out and see how I get along with each of them.

>>4381269
>zoom in
>not just ants but
>RED ants
>:(

>>4380769
>Limited FA better than ZF lenses
Surely you are coping, the L FA line is great but some Zeiss lenses are superb

>>4381336
the law diminishing returns applies on Zeiss glass well
spending 2/3/4/5 times as much to get an almost indistinguishable optical performance is dare I say retarded
and I don't mean it in pentcuck vs zeiss glass only terms either
many high end lenses are as good if not better than Zeiss glass
IMHO zeiss glass is only worth it for the complete Contax larp (and some of the Contax cameras are indeed extremely nice like the ST or 167MT)

File: PICT6302.jpg (487 KB, 1728x1152)

487 KB JPG

>>4381269
It could be that I slightly misfocused the tree picture. It's very easy to miss the focus

Macro 50 might be an interesting option for nature photography. The new HD FA 50/1.4 seems nice too. too bad there aren't that many sample pics taken with it at f/1.4. Try your DA50 sometimes at f/1.8 with a landscape scene and post results. Curious

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	79 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:07:20 19:20:07
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Creative
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Exposure Bias	1/2 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	53.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: PICT8714_v1.jpg (676 KB, 1800x1200)

676 KB JPG

Autumn evening

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	34784
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	90 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1800
Image Height	1200
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2024:11:09 16:35:43
Exposure Time	1/45 sec
F-Number	f/9.5
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Image Width	1800
Image Height	1200
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Soft
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

>>4383314
I think I preferred the version of this one you said was underexposed, but it is a nice shot. I really like the color of the sky and the light on just the buildings.

So I've been digging into my menus more and reading the manual a bit and the TAv mode is easily one of the best features I didn't know I wanted. It's great for shooting handheld in low light. It also seems good for dynamic environments. I know I've definitely missed shots because I saw something while in aperture priority and wished I had been in shutter priority to capture something with motion blur and it was too slow to change. I'm definitely going to play around with it some more.

>>4383464
>pentax user discovers the wildlife setting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAEV1HyS8Bg [Embed]

>>4367112 (OP)
is the weird puprle shit with the K1 Mk2 anything to really worry about or should i just get the K1

>>4383672
Just get the K-1, it's cheaper and iirc the only real difference is that the mkii bakes in noise reduction to the raws, and I thought the denoised images looked worse than the ones straight from the K-1

File: yellow_and_ants_1.jpg (4.32 MB, 5037x3379)

4.32 MB JPG

>>4381269
Last one, worse than the other yellow ants one.

>>4381520
Looking again, the top, dark part of the trunk may be in focus and it could just be all the leaves in front and behind that are not focused make the whole tree look blurred. I will try to get a da50 1.8 landscape for you, but I don't know when.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: 1722321301058694.jpg (35 KB, 400x396)

35 KB JPG

The Pentax K-1 is too good. It's not fair, I don't have a reason to gearfag anymore. I think about buying something, then I think "yeah, but will it be better than the K-1?" and the answer is always no. It's fucking gay.

>>4383765
what does the k-1 have over say the d850?

>>4383832
pixel shift
better viewfinder
ibis
size
price
much nicer ergonomics
more aesthetically pleasing

>>4383832
Much worse and fewer lenses
Autofocus off a d200
Meter bugs and broken mode dials
Gay spider legged screen that can’t flip up
Gimmicks you’ll never use like 0.5mm of shift for pc

File: PICT8696.jpg (524 KB, 1728x1152)

524 KB JPG

I managed to remove some of the yellowing from my vintage 50 lens. I left it under an Ikea lamp for about a week. No test shots yet. Pic unrelated.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	72 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:03 19:10:56
Exposure Time	1/45 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	48.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Soft
Saturation	Low
Sharpness	Soft
Subject Distance Range	Close View

>>4385783
which Ikea lamp?

>>4385785
The yellow one, duh

File: 6a00df351e888f883402b6853(...).jpg (75 KB, 603x563)

75 KB JPG

Seriously considering getting a k3-iii monochrome. What lens should I get to complement it? Right now I'm looking at either the 24mm f/2 or maybe the 20-40mm f/2.8-4?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4386452
The tragedy of pentax is unlike leica, they dont actually have a lens that holds up to this high pixel density+monochrome.

>>4386452
>the 20-40mm f/2.8-4
Notorious for being pretty unique despite its lackluster speed and range
By unique i mean renders with the character of an old prime lens, odd for a APS-C zoom

>>4386456
The new 16-50 plm zoom might come close if only one could afford it

>>4386456
>>4386637
would be interesting to see how the 85 1.4 fares, seeing as it's unusable for color

>>4386452
Looking forward to your future B&W threads of building corners and back of peoples' heads

Just ordered a Samsung gx10 (pentax k10d) for cheap
Excited to see how it compared to a Nikon D70. Will keep it if the backfocus issues are manageable. Supposedly can dial it in using the debug menu.

>>4386693
Prepare yourself for doing lots of focus bracketing.

File: SG106685.jpg (2.51 MB, 3872x2592)

2.51 MB JPG

>>4386948
Received gx10. Focus was way off as expected. Dialed in as much as possible w/ debug menu. Kit lens is the softest lens I have ever owned by a mile. Here's a SOOC jpeg with in-camera sharpening maxed.
Might play around with it a bit more then hawk it off to the next guy. At least the camera itself is in great condition.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG TECHWIN Co.
Camera Model	SAMSUNG GX10
Camera Software	GX10 Ver 1.30
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2006:01:01 01:49:54
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3872
Image Height	2592
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: PICT8570.jpg (487 KB, 1728x1152)

487 KB JPG

>>4387626
Is that the original DA 18-55 kit lens and not the "II" version? I think overexposure is a bigger problem in that picture. Flower petals clip colour channels very easily in direct sunlight.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	120 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:10:26 18:22:56
Exposure Time	1/10 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	1100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	80.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Soft
Subject Distance Range	Macro

>>4387647
it's a schneider-kreuznach d-xenon 3.5-5.6 18-55 AL.. which is a rebadged Pentax something or other
... You do realize that is just a test shot for sharpness right?

>>4387647
Went back and checked the raw/jpg it's not overexposed, no clipping at all.

File: SG106742_03.jpg (1.84 MB, 3872x2592)

1.84 MB JPG

Maybe I just expected too much.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG TECHWIN Co.
Camera Model	SAMSUNG GX10
Camera Software	darktable 4.8.1
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:11:23 20:54:43
Exposure Time	4 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3872
Image Height	2592
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Macro

>>4387626
>>4387692
Looks pretty okay to me

File: SG106800.jpg (3.35 MB, 3872x2592)

3.35 MB JPG

>>4387715
>pretty okay
Yeah that seems about right

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG TECHWIN Co.
Camera Model	SAMSUNG GX10
Camera Software	GX10 Ver 1.30
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2006:01:01 21:44:57
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3872
Image Height	2592
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: SG106845.jpg (3.17 MB, 3872x2592)

3.17 MB JPG

Seems like the AF even when dialed in is just unreliable. Same with exposure. At least the default colors seem nice for what it is. When it works it works... okay.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG TECHWIN Co.
Camera Model	SAMSUNG GX10
Camera Software	GX10 Ver 1.30
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2006:01:01 23:18:18
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3872
Image Height	2592
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Macro

>>4387771
>Image Created 2006:01:01 23:18:18
Don't forget to set your clock.

>>4387836
It adds to the faux-authenticity of the snapshits

File: 01_HD_FA50mmF1.4_2-scaled.jpg (341 KB, 2560x2060)

341 KB JPG

Been interested in this lens lately. Anyone tried it on your cameras yet?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX 645Z
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 21.2 (Windows)
Photographer	M.KOB
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	94 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3310
Image Height	2663
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2023:05:15 18:14:47
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/22.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/22.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	120.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3310
Image Height	2663
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Close View

File: 285587652_119928352417935(...).jpg (114 KB, 1440x1440)

114 KB JPG

I'm considering a Pentax DLSR because I have a specifically autistic desire for having the option to use the same lenses for both film and digital (ideally without adapting). I already own a Program A and a SMC 50/f1.4.
How is the experience of using these older lenses on the K-1/K-1Mk2?
Are the newer Pentax full frame lenses backwards compatible with the Program A? I know the focus rings tend to be quite quick and slippery on the new ones having owned a 20-40/f4 Limited - does anyone with experience consider this annoying?
How is the manual focusing experience in the K-1(/Mk2)? Is there an electronic focusing confirmation aid; is the focusing screen interchangeable for a split prism screen?

>>4387874
The autofocus is somehow worse than a 2007 nikon DSLR, with a focusing screen that is so thick and low res you can see the fresnel lines better than critical focus. Switch to F mount to share between film and DSLRs if the gimmicks (ie: IBIS) dont matter to you
EF to share between film and mirrorless

>>4387875
>muh canonikon garbage

File: new-gear-added-the-canon-(...).jpg (1.36 MB, 3024x4032)

1.36 MB JPG

>>4387875
>EF to share between film and mirrorless
Aren't most EF lenses a bit bulky to be adapting for mirrorless cameras? Seems to defeat a major pro of using mirrorless over DSLR. Would rather have a chunky body with a small lens than the opposite. I know EF has a shorter flange distance than F so the problem isn't as pronounced for Canon but still.
Besides Pentax my other idea was to get a used last or previous gen Nikon DSLR platform for the Voigtlander lenses that are also perfectly compatible with my F3 and do better on digital than the equivalent AI-S.
The last (and probably most rational) alternative would be to grab a 1V to complement my 5D4 as I do have a couple EF lenses already.
Yes, my gear is very inefficient, it's mostly hand me downs.

>>4387877
RF native lenses are also huge, and not even that good ($1500 24mm prime doesnt illuminate the whole sensor lol)

Its no sony/fuj

>>4387874
I use pentax digital bodies and pentax mx with the same pentax and adapted lenses and as long as they have aperture rings will work on both and the A lenses will also be able to shoot on digital in aperture priority mode as the aperture can be controlled from the body. With M lenses you have to go to manual mode and use the green button to measure the light before shooting.
I'm really enjoying the experience overall

>>4387874
There's a focus indicator for manual focus.
>>4387647
I like this.

whats the appeal? i mean this nicely

>>4387894
Top-tier bodies who can withstand tons of abuse and have tons of specs other brands do not have, great viewfinders, tons of button customization and modes, that's it i suppose

>>4387894
I hate canonikon and snoy garbage like you wouldn't believe it

>>4387894
Bodies are tanks, loads of cheap used lenses

>>4387894
It's a hipster brand. Nothing more. Pentax is borderline out of business and no longer improving. In fact, if their newer FF lens and body lineup says anything, they have gotten significantly worse. The K1 had reliability issues with the meter glitching out and part of the mode dial falling apart internally, and the K1-II forces raw noise reduction for every photo that reduces its low light shadow pushing ability (sony does something similar if you enable shading correction in camera but at least you can turn it off).

The only thing they do that nikon does not is put weather sealing on their cheapest aps-c junk. Instead their cheapest trash has aperture failures. Yes, I know they have IBIS. They don't have a native tilt shift lens and OIS lenses are as effective as pentax's third rate IBIS. K mount can't adapt SHIT either. The autofocus is notoriously slow and a bit inaccurate. For a photographer these are overpriced, oversized cameras with significantly reduced utility unless you already own a mountain of K mount lenses.

So why is it a hipster brand? Because the pentax k-1000 was the default camera for most photography school students so hipsters buy a pentax to feel like they are more of a real artist than just another "camera guy". So they just have to hate other brands (often irrationally) to cope after spending a boatload on a k3-iii and a bunch of mirrorless priced lenses with SLR performance.

If you don't hate yourself get an a7c and weather sealed tamron glass. It's as durable as any pentax, if not more because there is less to fail.

>>4387931
>muh snoykon garbage

>>4387909
>tons of button customization
honestly I find it to be a bit limited
maybe they're just better than everyone else but I doubt it
if that were the case then what the fuck is everyone else even doing

>>4387937
>then what the fuck is everyone else even doing
That's what i've been saying for 8 years, K1 still remains the best DSLR and probably will be for a long while

File: PICT2812.jpg (526 KB, 1728x1152)

526 KB JPG

Splash of light

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	72 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:28 21:38:31
Exposure Time	1/90 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Creative
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	-1/2 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	48.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Close View

File: PICT3495.jpg (514 KB, 1728x1152)

514 KB JPG

>>4387885
Thanks a lot Anon

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:06:07 21:53:26
Exposure Time	1.5 sec
F-Number	f/13.0
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Close View

What's a good and cheap lens for my K5, Looking for something that zooms to 200mm or there abouts

>>4387931
As I read up on Pentax camera models and old forums posts, I find that almost every model has quality control issues/ flaws. Not to mention the lenses are inferior to the competition by a noticeable margin. I guess that's why the used market for Pentax cameras/lenses seems more affordable.
Not shitting on Pentax, I'll snag an a K5 sooner or later. They do make some nice jpegs imho.

>>4367112 (OP)
I'm sure they're great, but Pentax always sounds to me like it's some kind of feminine hygiene product.

>>4388063
>Forget quality, i need a cool name in my camera for my pics to be good
I don't know if you are bottom retard or peak artist

>>4388082
>I don't know if you are bottom retard or peak artist
Bottom artist?

File: SG106950.jpg (2.06 MB, 3872x2592)

2.06 MB JPG

SOOC colors are really quite nice
DPreview test chart doesn't do Pentax justice

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG TECHWIN Co.
Camera Model	SAMSUNG GX10
Camera Software	GX10 Ver 1.30
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2006:01:05 06:15:10
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3872
Image Height	2592
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: DSC_0071.jpg (759 KB, 3008x2000)

759 KB JPG

>>4388395
Not a fair comparison since the lighting changed in between shots but here's a shot from my D70 with contrast maxed (also SOOC). Pentax was at default everything for reference.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D70
Camera Software	Ver.2.00
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	824
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	105 mm
Serial Number	-1000216
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:11:27 04:03:03
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3008
Image Height	2000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Hard
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
ISO Speed Used	200
Image Quality	BASIC
White Balance	AUTO
Image Sharpening	HIGH
Focus Mode	AF-S
Flash Setting	REAR SLOW
Flash Compensation	0.0 EV
ISO Speed Requested	200
Flash Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
AE Bracket Compensation	0.0 EV
Tone Compensation	HIGH
Lens Type	Nikon D Series
Lens Range	18.0 - 70.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/4.5
Auto Focus	Single Area, Center Selected, Top Focused
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Color Mode	Portrait sRGB
Lighting Type	NATURAL
Noise Reduction	OFF
Camera Actuations	16575
Image Optimization	CUSTOM
Saturation 2	NORMAL

>>4388396
>>4388395
Sharpness was maxed on both*

Sisters, do anyone have a raw of a K50 that can share? I am on the fence about buying one. Yes I want a pink camera but I also want to use it for you know, actual photos.

File: pentax tho.jpg (154 KB, 1006x1599)

154 KB JPG

gear posting cause I tidied it all up a bit recently

>>4390472
based

File: IMGP9268.jpg (495 KB, 1728x1152)

495 KB JPG

Kind of low contrast scene

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	90 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:09 18:53:09
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/13.0
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: IMGP9274.jpg (492 KB, 1728x1152)

492 KB JPG

>>4391130
+3 contrast

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	102 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:12:09 18:57:34
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/13.0
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1/2 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	68.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

File: 123.jpg (4.42 MB, 3888x2608)

4.42 MB JPG

Bargain bin Quantaray 70-300 seems pretty good

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	GX10
Camera Software	RawTherapee 5.11
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	450 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72
Vertical Resolution	72
Image Created	2024:12:10 12:10:59
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Close View

File: SG107121.jpg (4.35 MB, 3888x2608)

4.35 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	GX10
Camera Software	RawTherapee 5.11
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72
Vertical Resolution	72
Image Created	2024:12:10 10:55:05
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	300.00 mm

>>4391156
It's excellent

File: SG107148.jpg (2.16 MB, 3888x2608)

2.16 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	GX10
Camera Software	RawTherapee 5.11
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72
Vertical Resolution	72
Image Created	2024:12:10 11:04:21
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	180.00 mm

>>4391156

Major underrated lens, has apochromatic optics and honestly if you don't need VR or larger aperture, it's perfect.

File: PICT7435.jpg (488 KB, 1728x1152)

488 KB JPG

Dark forest vibes

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:09:07 18:36:10
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Creative
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Close View

File: PICT7451.jpg (523 KB, 1728x1152)

523 KB JPG

This one taken with a polarizing filter just to make a slightly longer exposure.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:09:08 20:17:57
Exposure Time	1/2 sec
F-Number	f/19.0
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1728
Image Height	1152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Soft
Subject Distance Range	Close View

File: Screenshot 2024-12-22 at (...).png (62 KB, 230x188)

62 KB PNG

>>4394244
pentax moment

File: IMGP3132HD,50 mm,F1.8,iso(...).jpg (1.19 MB, 1618x1080)

1.19 MB JPG

Some test pics taken with the HD Pentax-FA50 F1.4 lens

https://www.yaotomi.co.jp/blog/walk/2023/05/-hd-pentax-fa-50mmf14-2023.html

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 10.2.1 Windows
Photographer	Osyanpo_K
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	1618
Image Height	1080

>>4395234
you like it over the older 50mm f1.4?

>>4395291
What do you mean? It's the same lens.

File: IMGP9359 (2).jpg (504 KB, 1152x1728)

504 KB JPG

Last night I took a picture of my new pepper mill. The background was a black t-shirt.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX
Camera Model	PENTAX K-7
Camera Software	K-7 Ver 1.13
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2025:01:04 23:35:16
Exposure Time	3 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1152
Image Height	1728
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Soft
Saturation	Low
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown